Our process is built for Dallas conflicts density and short start dates, not volume resume drops. We open with a written mandate: practice and matter list, seniority band, day-rate or retainer authority, classification (W-2 versus 1099), non-negotiable conflicts and a target start inside 2 to 5 weeks. Only then do we map the addressable counsel set from our Dallas coverage and global research base of nearly 1.5 million lawyer profiles, filtered by practice, seniority and known platform constraints.
Approach is confidential and sequential. We validate interest, recent matter ownership, rate expectations and reason for a project seat before names reach the client. Conflicts grids run early—often before first client interviews—so a late-stage wall does not burn a deal calendar or leave-cover start date. Rate discussions stay inside the client's real day-rate or retainer authority; we do not float packages the GC or hiring partner will not ratify. Counter-offer coaching assumes the 20% Dallas interim incidence our mandate telemetry records across 36 closed searches and plans resignation timing around live deals, trials or vesting cliffs.
Close and integration matter as much as the engagement letter. We stay on the file through acceptance, resignation or leave handoff, counter-offer navigation and a 30-day check on matter ownership. Over the trailing three years that discipline produced 36 completed Dallas Interim Legal Talent searches at a 94% completion rate and a 2-to-5-week median timeline. The same cohort of structured interviews that anchors our research programme keeps the method honest: counsel tell us when day rates will not clear opportunity cost, and we treat that as diligence, not a failure of persuasion.