Our process is built for San Francisco conflicts density and deal-credit verification, not volume outreach. We open with a written mandate: practice economics, target portable-revenue band, non-negotiable tech, venture and PE walls, guarantee authority and committee timeline. Only then do we map the addressable Corporate & M&A partner set from the ~14,000 lawyers we map in San Francisco, filtered by origination band, public versus private deal mix and known platform constraints.
Approach is confidential and sequential. We validate interest, three-year originations, rate cards and reason for move before names reach the client. Conflicts grids run early—often before first-round partner interviews—so a late-stage portfolio-company wall does not waste executive-committee time. Comp discussions stay inside the firm's real guarantee and capital authority; we do not float packages the partnership will not ratify. Counter-offer coaching assumes the 40% San Francisco partner incidence our mandate telemetry records and plans resignation timing around live financings and deal calendars.
Close support runs through acceptance, resignation, counter-offer navigation and a 90-day integration check on client transition. Over the trailing three years that discipline produced 20 completed San Francisco Partner Recruiting searches at a 93% completion rate and a 5.5-month median timeline. The work is technical lateral Corporate & M&A partner search—book schedules, portfolio conflicts grids and guarantee design—not mass name-gathering. Partners tell us when books will not move, and we treat that as diligence, not a failure of persuasion.