›Direct answer & research summary
Sartori & Partners applies a weighted methodology that blends practising-lawyer opinion — more than 10,000 lawyers interviewed — with monthly market surveys. As of July 2026, the Corporate & M&A firms on the Beijing board are: JunHe, King & Wood Mallesons, Han Kun Law Offices, Paul Hastings, Loeb & Loeb, Morgan Lewis, HSF Kramer, Clifford Chance.
01 — The ranking
The Beijing Corporate & M&A board
Use this page as a structured Corporate & M&A market map for Beijing: 8 firms placed in worded bands that reflect deal flow, senior bench depth and peer standing as of July 2026. REF codes cite rows; they do not number them.
Market leaders set the Corporate & M&A reference point in Beijing as of July 2026: firms peers treat as the benchmark for deal leadership and senior bench strength. Within this tier no firm outranks another.
This tier marks firms that compete routinely for significant Beijing Corporate & M&A work. Standing is expressed in words; monthly rotation does not imply rank.
Established on the Beijing Corporate & M&A board signals proven M&A and corporate advisory presence and credible depth. Labels are words; monthly sequence is a locator, not a league position.
These firms sit outside the main Corporate & M&A tiers by design: confirmed on the Beijing map, not assessed at the depth required for Market leaders through Established.
All counts are shown as bands, never precise headcounts. Notable firms sit outside the tiers by design: verified minimal presence, not assessed at full tier depth.
Hiring in Beijing?
We map this market every day.
The evidence behind these tiers is the same intelligence we use to run retained searches for partners, groups and senior associates.
02 — Evidence, methodology & sources why each firm · how tiers are set · sources · change log · verified 23 Jul 2026 · next review 23 Aug 2026
Firm evidence
JunHe
JunHe is placed in market leaders for Corporate & M&A in Beijing. Public mapping (banded): 100–199 attorneys, major local depth, ≈90 partners · 20 counsel · 5+ associates. Evidence gates — office (G1) PASS, local practice (G2) PASS, recent signal (G3) PASS. The placement carries no numeric score.
Strongest mapped work
Public hiring signal
Hiring signal: FLAT — no public hiring change detected in the mapping window.
Limits of this assessment
- —A tier is Sartori’s editorial opinion, not a fact about the firm or a client-satisfaction measure.
- —Facts are mapped from public sources and shown as bands; they lag reality by weeks or months.
- —No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input.
Sources for this entry
- Beijing Head Officefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- JunHe — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
- JunHe — Beijing news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
Methodology
How tiers are assigned
Deterministic public-footprint core (local depth, practice share, seniority mix, public hiring momentum), computed relative to this market's own distribution. Tier placement is derived from this public mapped data; a per-firm public-source ledger is compiled for firms in the annual research pass and applies to those firms' factual claims, not to tier membership. No third-party legal-directory bands are used as an input.
Market scope
5–9 firms earn a tier in Beijing within this scope (banded).
Disclosures
Firm names used nominatively (factual). All counts shown as bands, never precise headcounts. No firm logos. Report an error via the site contact form.
Sources & change log
- 1 Beijing Head Officefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 2 JunHe — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
- 3 JunHe — Beijing news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
- 4 Locationsfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 5 办公机构 - 金杜律师事务所firm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 6 办公机构 - 金杜律师事务所firm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 7 King & Wood Mallesons — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
- 8 King & Wood Mallesons — Beijing news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
- 9 Contact Usfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 10 Han Kun Law Offices — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
- 11 Han Kun releases its 2025 VC/PE Data Analysis Reportfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
- 12 Locations | Loeb & Loeb LLPfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
- 13 Beijing | Loeb & Loeb LLPfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
- 14 Loeb & Loeb — Beijing news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
04 — Questions
About this ranking
Who are the best Corporate & M&A law firms in Beijing?
Sartori's answer for the best Corporate & M&A law firms in Beijing as of July 2026 starts with Market leaders: JunHe. The board then places the remaining firms among Highly active, Established and Notable bands — labels in words, never numeric ranks.
Is JunHe the best Corporate & M&A law firm in Beijing?
JunHe sits in Tier 1 — Market leaders — of Sartori's Beijing Corporate & M&A board as of July 2026, alongside . Sartori does not name a single #1: the gap between Tier 1 firms is genuinely unmeasurable, and a numeric score would be false precision.
Which firms have the biggest Corporate & M&A benches in Beijing?
By mapped Beijing bench, the largest firms on this board are JunHe, Han Kun Law Offices (100–199 mapped lawyers each), followed by King & Wood Mallesons (50–99). All counts are bands, never precise headcounts.
Which Corporate & M&A teams are hiring in Beijing?
As of July 2026, no firm on this board shows a public hiring signal in the mapping window. Live Beijing mandates are listed on Sartori's jobs board.
What is a Tier 1 law firm?
In Sartori's rankings, Tier 1 — Market leaders — is an editorial judgement expressed in words, never a score: the firms whose Beijing bench depth, seniority mix and market standing set the reference point for the market. As of July 2026 that is JunHe. Within the tier no firm outranks another.
Which are the best law firms in Beijing overall?
Sartori's overall Beijing board groups 16 firms into editorial tiers; as of July 2026 its Tier 1 is King & Wood Mallesons, JunHe. See /firms/in/beijing/.
This ranking is compiled independently by Sartori from public sources. Tiers are Sartori’s editorial opinion, expressed without numeric scores; firms are named for identification only, no logos are reproduced, and no firm has paid for or approved its placement. No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input. Nothing here is legal advice or a recommendation to instruct counsel.