Firm Index · Practice ranking
Top Energy & Natural Resources firms
The firms with the deepest energy & natural resources footprint, ranked 0–100 by the Sartori Firm Index.
Leading Energy & Natural Resources firms by Index
These are the law firms with the strongest public Energy & Natural Resources footprint, ranked by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 measure of scale, reach and hiring built entirely from public data. The ranking reflects how large and active each firm's presence is, not the quality or prestige of its energy & natural resources practice. Depth labels (“major”, “strong”, “present”) show how central energy & natural resources is to each firm relative to its size. Headcount is the attorney footprint we map from public sources, shown as ranges. Explore the Energy & Natural Resources talent market →
| # | Firm | Index | Depth | Tier | Attorneys mapped | Top markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader | 75.7 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | Washington, London, New York… |
| 2 | CMS | 71 | present | Global | 4,000+ | London, Paris, Amsterdam… |
| 3 | Ashurst Perkins Coie | 69.3 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Seattle, London, New York… |
| 4 | HSF Kramer | 68.2 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, New York, Sydney… |
| 5 | A&O Shearman | 67.9 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Amsterdam… |
| 6 | Norton Rose Fulbright | 65.3 | strong | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Houston… |
| 7 | Troutman Pepper Locke | 65.3 | present | International | 1,500–2,500 | Atlanta, Philadelphia, New York… |
| 8 | White & Case | 64.9 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | New York, London, Paris… |
| 9 | Eversheds Sutherland | 64.9 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, Atlanta, Washington… |
| 10 | Clyde & Co | 64.7 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Manchester, New York… |
| 11 | Clifford Chance | 64 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Paris… |
| 12 | Linklaters | 62 | strong | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, Paris, Frankfurt… |
| 13 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | 61.7 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, London, Washington… |
| 14 | Sheppard | 59 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | Los Angeles, New York, San Diego… |
| 15 | Akin | 57.5 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Washington, London… |
| 16 | Pinsent Masons | 57.3 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, Birmingham, Manchester… |
| 17 | Skadden | 57.2 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, Washington, London… |
| 18 | Morgan Lewis | 57.1 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Washington, Philadelphia, New York… |
| 19 | Littler Mendelson | 56.8 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | San Francisco, Bogotá, Los Angeles… |
| 20 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 56.4 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | San Francisco, New York, Washington… |
| 21 | Sidley Austin | 56.2 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, Chicago, Washington… |
| 22 | Reed Smith | 55.1 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Pittsburgh, New York… |
| 23 | Haynes and Boone | 55 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Dallas, New York, Houston… |
| 24 | Addleshaw Goddard | 54.9 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Manchester, Leeds… |
| 25 | Husch Blackwell | 53.2 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | St. Louis, Kansas City, Washington… |
| 26 | Fisher Phillips | 51.5 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Los Angeles, Atlanta, San Diego… |
| 27 | Osborne Clarke | 51 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | London, Bristol, Paris… |
| 28 | Holland & Hart | 51 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Denver, Salt Lake City, Boise… |
| 29 | Orrick | 50.5 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, San Francisco, Washington… |
| 30 | Quinn Emanuel | 50 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Los Angeles, London… |
| 31 | Kromann Reumert | 49.1 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Copenhagen, Aarhus, London |
| 32 | McGuireWoods | 49.1 | strong | International | 1,000–1,500 | Richmond, Charlotte, Washington… |
| 33 | Jackson Walker | 48.9 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Dallas, Austin, Houston… |
| 34 | Fredrikson & Byron | 48.6 | strong | International | 500–1,000 | Minneapolis, Des Moines, Fargo… |
| 35 | Milbank | 48.5 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, London, Munich… |
| 36 | Brodies | 47.9 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen… |
| 37 | McCarter & English | 47.8 | present | National | 250–500 | Newark, Boston, New York… |
| 38 | Cuatrecasas | 47.5 | present | Global | 500–1,000 | Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon… |
| 39 | Hunton Andrews Kurth | 47.2 | strong | Global | 500–1,000 | Richmond, Washington, New York… |
| 40 | Jones Walker | 47.1 | present | National | 250–500 | New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Jackson… |
| 41 | Fennemore | 46.1 | present | National | 250–500 | Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco… |
| 42 | Mallesons | 45.9 | strong | International | 250–500 | Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane… |
| 43 | Foley Hoag | 45.6 | present | International | 250–500 | Boston, New York, Washington… |
| 44 | Loyens & Loeff | 45.4 | present | Global | 500–1,000 | Amsterdam, Luxembourg, Brussels… |
| 45 | Steptoe & Johnson PLLC | 45.1 | major | National | 250–500 | Pittsburgh, Charleston, Bridgeport… |
| 46 | Stoel Rives | 44.1 | strong | National | 250–500 | Portland, Seattle, Sacramento… |
| 47 | Bracewell | 43.9 | major | International | 250–500 | Houston, Washington, New York… |
| 48 | MinterEllison | 43.8 | present | International | 250–500 | Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane… |
| 49 | TLT | 43.8 | present | International | 500–1,000 | Bristol, London, Manchester… |
| 50 | Watson Farley & Williams | 43.6 | strong | Global | 500–1,000 | London, Athens, Madrid… |
Index measures public footprint and momentum, not quality or prestige. Methodology. Spot an error? Tell us.
Related views
Energy & Natural Resources talent market
Every firm and credible mover in this practice, mapped and qualified.
Explore the marketWho's hiring in Energy & Natural Resources
Firms advertising live roles in this practice on their own careers sites.
See hiring nowThe full Sartori Firm Index
All firms ranked by footprint and momentum.
View the indexEnergy & Natural Resources firm rankings — common questions
How are the top Energy & Natural Resources firms ranked?
Firms are ordered by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 score built from public signals (scale, geographic and practice reach, live hiring). This page lists firms for whom energy & natural resources is a leading practice. The Index measures public footprint and momentum, not the quality of any firm's energy & natural resources work.
What does the depth label mean?
“Major”, “strong” and “present” describe how large a share of the firm's mapped attorneys work in energy & natural resources, relative to the firm's overall size — a footprint signal, not a quality judgement.
Hiring in Energy & Natural Resources?
Turn the ranking into a shortlist.
Whether you are building a team or weighing a move, we listen first. No obligation.