Firm Index · Practice ranking
Top Intellectual Property firms
The firms with the deepest intellectual property footprint, ranked 0–100 by the Sartori Firm Index.
Leading Intellectual Property firms by Index
These are the law firms with the strongest public Intellectual Property footprint, ranked by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 measure of scale, reach and hiring built entirely from public data. The ranking reflects how large and active each firm's presence is, not the quality or prestige of its intellectual property practice. Depth labels (“major”, “strong”, “present”) show how central intellectual property is to each firm relative to its size. Headcount is the attorney footprint we map from public sources, shown as ranges. Explore the Intellectual Property talent market →
| # | Firm | Index | Depth | Tier | Attorneys mapped | Top markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dentons | 78.2 | present | Global | 4,000+ | London, Toronto, New York… |
| 2 | DLA Piper | 75.7 | strong | Global | 4,000+ | New York, London, Chicago… |
| 3 | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer | 71.3 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Frankfurt… |
| 4 | CMS | 70.8 | strong | Global | 4,000+ | London, Paris, Amsterdam… |
| 5 | Baker McKenzie | 70.2 | strong | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, Chicago, Amsterdam… |
| 6 | HSF Kramer | 68.5 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, New York, Sydney… |
| 7 | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 68.3 | present | National | 1,500–2,500 | San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York… |
| 8 | Hogan Lovells | 66.3 | strong | Global | 2,500–4,000 | Washington, London, Munich… |
| 9 | Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | 66.2 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, Los Angeles, Washington… |
| 10 | Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith | 65.1 | present | National | 1,500–2,500 | Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco… |
| 11 | Eversheds Sutherland | 64.5 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, Atlanta, Washington… |
| 12 | Norton Rose Fulbright | 64.4 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Houston… |
| 13 | White & Case | 62.5 | present | Global | 2,500–4,000 | London, New York, Paris… |
| 14 | Goodwin Procter | 62.5 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Boston, New York, Washington… |
| 15 | Covington & Burling | 62.2 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Washington, New York, San Francisco… |
| 16 | Taft Stettinius & Hollister | 61.7 | strong | National | 1,000–1,500 | Chicago, Minneapolis, Indianapolis… |
| 17 | Greenberg Traurig | 61.5 | strong | Global | 2,500–4,000 | New York, Miami, Chicago… |
| 18 | Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | 61.3 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | London, St. Louis, New York… |
| 19 | Cooley Godward | 61.1 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | San Francisco, Washington, New York… |
| 20 | Wilson Elser | 60.9 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco… |
| 21 | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath | 60.7 | strong | International | 1,000–1,500 | Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Chicago… |
| 22 | Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | 59.8 | present | National | 1,000–1,500 | Atlanta, Columbia, Miami… |
| 23 | Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | 59.7 | strong | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, San Francisco, Washington… |
| 24 | Baker & Hostetler | 59.1 | strong | National | 1,000–1,500 | New York, Cleveland, Washington… |
| 25 | Jones Day | 58.8 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | New York, London, Washington… |
| 26 | Morrison & Foerster | 58.6 | major | Global | 1,000–1,500 | San Francisco, Washington, New York… |
| 27 | Kirkland & Ellis | 57.5 | present | Global | 4,000+ | New York, Chicago, London… |
| 28 | Squire Patton Boggs | 57.5 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | London, Washington, Los Angeles… |
| 29 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 57.5 | present | Global | 500–1,000 | New York, Chicago, Washington… |
| 30 | K&L Gates | 57.4 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Pittsburgh, Melbourne, Seattle… |
| 31 | Dinsmore | 57.3 | major | National | 500–1,000 | Cincinnati, Columbus, Louisville… |
| 32 | Weil Gotshal & Manges | 56.9 | present | Global | 1,000–1,500 | New York, London, Washington… |
| 33 | Morgan Lewis | 56.5 | strong | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Washington, Philadelphia, New York… |
| 34 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman | 56.4 | strong | Global | 500–1,000 | Washington, New York, San Francisco… |
| 35 | FBT Gibbons | 56.4 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Louisville, Cincinnati, Newark… |
| 36 | Seyfarth Shaw | 55.9 | present | International | 1,000–1,500 | Chicago, New York, Los Angeles… |
| 37 | Haynes and Boone | 55.8 | major | International | 500–1,000 | Dallas, New York, Houston… |
| 38 | Wilmer Hale | 55.8 | strong | International | 1,000–1,500 | Washington, Boston, New York… |
| 39 | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | 55.8 | major | Global | 1,000–1,500 | San Francisco, Washington, New York… |
| 40 | Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz | 55.8 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Nashville, Baltimore, Memphis… |
| 41 | Spencer Fane | 55 | strong | National | 500–1,000 | Kansas City, Denver, Houston… |
| 42 | Bird & Bird | 54.9 | major | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Paris, Milan… |
| 43 | Maynard Nexsen | 54.8 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Birmingham, Columbia, Charlotte… |
| 44 | Reed Smith | 54.8 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | London, Pittsburgh, New York… |
| 45 | Bradley Arant | 54.3 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Birmingham, Nashville, Atlanta… |
| 46 | Akerman Senterfitt | 54.1 | present | National | 500–1,000 | Miami, New York, Chicago… |
| 47 | Dickinson Wright | 54.1 | major | International | 500–1,000 | Troy, Toronto, Detroit… |
| 48 | Husch Blackwell | 54.1 | strong | National | 1,000–1,500 | St. Louis, Kansas City, Milwaukee… |
| 49 | Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton | 53.4 | major | International | 500–1,000 | Atlanta, San Francisco, Winston-Salem… |
| 50 | Mayer Brown | 52.9 | present | Global | 1,500–2,500 | Chicago, New York, London… |
Index measures public footprint and momentum, not quality or prestige. Methodology. Spot an error? Tell us.
Related views
Intellectual Property talent market
Every firm and credible mover in this practice, mapped and qualified.
Explore the marketWho's hiring in Intellectual Property
Firms advertising live roles in this practice on their own careers sites.
See hiring nowThe full Sartori Firm Index
All firms ranked by footprint and momentum.
View the indexIntellectual Property firm rankings — common questions
How are the top Intellectual Property firms ranked?
Firms are ordered by the Sartori Firm Index — a 0–100 score built from public signals (scale, geographic and practice reach, live hiring). This page lists firms for whom intellectual property is a leading practice. The Index measures public footprint and momentum, not the quality of any firm's intellectual property work.
What does the depth label mean?
“Major”, “strong” and “present” describe how large a share of the firm's mapped attorneys work in intellectual property, relative to the firm's overall size — a footprint signal, not a quality judgement.
Hiring in Intellectual Property?
Turn the ranking into a shortlist.
Whether you are building a team or weighing a move, we listen first. No obligation.