Firm dossier

Independent profile — compiled by Sartori

Roetzel & Andress

A national-footprint firm mapped by Sartori across 11 offices in 1 countries, with its largest mapped office in Akron.

Last verified 23 Jul 2026 · Next review by 23 Aug 2026 · Change log

Summary

Roetzel & Andress is mapped by Sartori across 11 offices in 1 countries (National footprint), headquartered in Akron. Headcount band: 100–250 attorneys. Strongest mapped practices: Litigation & Disputes, Real Estate, Employment & Labor. It appears in 0 Ranking Atlas pages. Profile compiled from public facts, last verified 23 Jul 2026.

01 — Public record

Facts on file

Compiled from public sources. Figures are shown as bands where exact counts are not published; nothing here is provided by the firm.

Largest mapped office

Akron, US

Professionals

100–250 attorneys banded

Countries covered

1 via 11 offices

Office footprint — mapped metros

11 offices · 1 countries
AkronClevelandChicagoColumbusNaplesYoungstownFort MyersToledoCincinnatiWoosterWashington

Principal practices

Litigation & DisputesReal EstateEmployment & LaborPrivate Client & Estate PlanningBankruptcy & RestructuringCorporate & M&AHealthcare & Life SciencesGovernment & Public Sector

Bold chips mark the firm’s deepest mapped practices (major or strong).

Seniority mix — banded, fee earners

≈90 partners · 30 counsel · 60+ associates

Mapped from public bios and firm pages; exact counts are not published, so figures are shown as approximate bands.

Sartori Firm Index — footprint (a different lens from the Atlas tiers)

National · coverage 2 of 3

38.5

Composite SFI

SFI sub-index · banded

49.1

Scale

SFI sub-index · banded

23.8

Reach

SFI sub-index · banded

The Sartori Firm Index measures footprint and momentum (scale · reach · hiring), not practice quality. It never assigns an Atlas tier, and the Atlas never reuses this number — the two lenses are deliberately separate.

02 — Where this firm is ranked

Ranking Atlas & Firm Index

No composite firm score is published. Atlas tiers are assigned per market or practice from public footprint and evidence; the Firm Index leaderboards are a separate footprint lens.

0 Sartori listings in total
0 Ranking Atlas pages
0 Firm Index leaderboards
0 Tier 1 (Market leaders) positions

0 listings · Atlas tiers apply only within their own market or practice

Listing Type Tier
03 — Sources & verification Last verified 23 Jul 2026 · next review by 23 Aug 2026 · change log

Public sources

  1. 1 Roetzel & Andress - Officesfirm_website · 2026-07-22
  2. 2 Roetzel & Andress — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · 2026-07-22
  3. 3 Roetzel & Andress — news & announcementsfirm_website · 2026-07-22

Know the limits of this data

  • Figures are bands, not audited counts; public sources lag reality by weeks or months.
  • Atlas tiers are Sartori’s independent editorial opinion — not the firm’s claim, and not a client-satisfaction measure.
  • No firm-level numeric score exists; Atlas tiers apply only within their own market or practice.
  • No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input.
Report an error in this profile

Corrections from the firm or its representatives are reviewed within five working days.

Change log

23 Jul 2026 init Public mapped facts; rankings from published Atlas pages + SFI leaderboards.
23 Jul 2026 evidence_ingested 3 verified source(s) ingested → APPROVED (auto).

For candidates

Weighing a move to a firm like this?

A named consultant, a confidential read on the market, and evidence — not brochure copy — before you ever make an approach.

Speak confidentially

For law firms

Competing for the same talent?

We map this market daily. Retained search for partners, practice groups and senior associates, run with discretion.

Discuss a mandate

[email protected]

Roetzel & Andress is profiled here independently by Sartori. This page is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in cooperation with the firm; firm names are used for identification only and no logo or brand assets are reproduced. Rankings reflect Sartori’s editorial methodology and public mapping — they are not legal advice, nor a recommendation to instruct counsel.