Salary benchmarks

eDiscovery project manager salary in 2026

Two readers, one table. The person in the seat needs the band. The company paying needs the gap between a project-manager survey and the hourly it already pays a vendor.

Benchmark this hire Talk to us
01 Start here

2026 bands for the ediscovery project manager salary.

Read the band for the seat you are actually hiring. The May 2025 occupation median is the number finance pastes in when nobody has priced discovery.

2026 base and target bonus by seat. Year is 2026 on every Sartori band. Public anchors in the next table carry their own year. Sort by the low end of base.
Seat Who pays 2026 base 2026 target bonus Cohort behind the band
eDiscovery project manager US company, reporting to legal operations or litigation $145,000–$175,000 10–15% 22 corporate interviewees, January 2024–June 2026; median stated base $156,000
Litigation-support manager Law firm, discovery or litigation support $125,000–$160,000 5–10% 15 law-firm interviewees; median stated base $138,000. 8 of 15 had no stated target.
eDiscovery project manager ALSP or eDiscovery vendor $115,000–$145,000 8–12% 9 vendor interviewees; median stated base $128,000; median target 10%
Director, eDiscovery or litigation support Company or law firm, function owner $175,000–$220,000 15–20% 6 director requisitions priced January 2024–June 2026, separate from the interviews and from closed searches. Median opening base $190,000.

The four rows are Sartori & Partners offer bands for 2026. They are not the Bureau of Labor Statistics occupation wage. The interview medians are stated current base, which is why the Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta corporate median of $142,000 can sit $3,000 under the $145,000–$175,000 floor.

A project-manager median prices an occupation. An eDiscovery project manager prices a matter.
On the survey and the seat
02 The salary gap

The gap is the survey, the grade, and the invoice.

Finance opens the requisition at the occupation median. The department is already buying the same work by the hour. Those two numbers do not meet.

There is no Bureau of Labor Statistics occupation called eDiscovery project manager. BLS prices duties, not titles. In May 2025 the median annual wage for project management specialists (SOC 13-1082) was $102,320, on an employment base of 1,066,670 in the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics released 15 May 2026. The mean was $110,740. The lowest 10 percent earned under $61,580 and the highest 10 percent earned above $167,970. The Occupational Outlook Handbook, last modified 27 August 2026, puts the same median on a 7 percent growth projection from 2025 to 2035.

Paralegals are the other wrong cell. In May 2025 their median was $62,890. In legal services it was $61,770, which is $1,120 lower, not higher. The highest 10 percent of paralegals earned more than $101,500, which is the neighborhood of the $102,320 project-manager median. A promotion that changes the title and holds the paralegal band has not changed the pay.

The industry cut does not rescue the requisition. In May 2025, project management specialists in professional, scientific, and technical services — the sector that contains law firms — had a median of $108,260. That is $5,940 above the all-industry median of $102,320. The all-occupations median in the same vintage was $50,980. Lawyers, a different occupation, had a May 2025 median of $159,670, which is $57,350 above the project-manager median. None of those cells is a discovery manager who has run processing, hosting, and review on a live matter.

Public anchors a company can paste without a job board. Every figure carries its year. The last row is arithmetic on the Summer 2025 hourly band, at 1,800 hours, not a surveyed salary.
Anchor Figure Year Source
Project management specialists, median annual wage $102,320 May 2025 BLS OOH, SOC 13-1082
Same occupation, mean annual wage $110,740 May 2025 BLS OEWS, released 15 May 2026; 1,066,670 jobs
Same occupation, professional, scientific, and technical services $108,260 May 2025 BLS OOH
Paralegals and legal assistants, median $62,890 May 2025 BLS OOH; legal services median $61,770
Lawyers, median $159,670 May 2025 BLS OOH
GS-12 Step 1, Washington-Baltimore-Arlington $102,415 January 2026 OPM Salary Table 2026-DCB; 33.94% locality
GS-13 Step 1, same locality $121,785 January 2026 OPM Salary Table 2026-DCB
GS-13 Step 5, same locality $138,024 January 2026 OPM Salary Table 2026-DCB
GS-14 Step 1, same locality $143,913 January 2026 OPM Salary Table 2026-DCB; Step 10 is $187,093
eDiscovery project-management support, hourly $100–$200 Summer 2025 51% of 70 ComplexDiscovery / EDRM respondents; 31% above $200
That hourly band at 1,800 hours $180,000–$360,000 Derived, 2026 $100 and $200 times 36 hours times 50 weeks

The federal schedule is not an eDiscovery wage survey. It is the only public cash ladder, grade by step, that a Washington-area employer can read without a salary site. Effective January 2026, OPM’s Washington-Baltimore-Arlington table applies a 1 percent General Schedule increase and a 33.94 percent locality payment. GS-12 Step 1 is $102,415. That is $95 above the May 2025 project-manager median of $102,320. The occupation median and the first step of GS-12 are the same conversation. GS-13 Step 1 is $121,785, which is $19,465 above that median. GS-14 Step 1 is $143,913, which is $41,593 above it. GS-13 Step 10 is $158,322. GS-14 Step 10 is $187,093.

The 2026 corporate offer band of $145,000–$175,000 sits on that GS-14 scale, above Step 1 and short of Step 10. The law-firm interview median of $138,000 sits $24 under the January 2026 GS-13 Step 5 rate of $138,024. A company that wants a federal analogue should open the DCB table at GS-13 or GS-14, not at the all-industry median.

What finance pastesWhat the matter costs

  1. Occupation survey BLS prices project management specialists and paralegals. Neither title is the person who runs a review.
  2. Federal grade The January 2026 Washington schedule is a public ladder. GS-12 matches the survey. The seat does not.
  3. Vendor hourly The invoice the department already approves is the number the in-house band has to beat.
03 Public anchors

Where the May 2025 wage sits, and where the hourly sits.

The bars are the survey’s hourly split. The scale is annual wages from paralegal to lawyer. The in-house band is in the table above, not repeated here.

Summer 2025 ComplexDiscovery and EDRM eDiscovery Pricing Survey, project-management support. Shares as published; 3 percent were under $100, 1 percent used another model, and 13 percent were uncertain. Rounded shares sum to 99, not 100.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ with the EDRM, Summer 2025, 70 respondents. Results published from 27 August 2025.

Annual wages on one axis. May 2025 occupation medians and January 2026 Washington GS steps. Not an eDiscovery census. Click a marker for the instrument.
May 2025 project manager to lawyer
$50k$200k

Paralegals, median annual wage

May 2025. Legal services median was $61,770. Highest 10 percent earned more than $101,500.

BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, paralegals

At the midpoint of the band 51 percent reported, $150 an hour for 1,800 hours is $270,000. The midpoint is the center of the published range, not a median rate the survey stated. The low end, $100 times 1,800, is $180,000. The high end of that same band, $200 times 1,800, is $360,000. The 31 percent above $200 an hour annualize still higher. The survey did not print an upper bound, so none is used. 1,800 hours is 36 hours a week for 50 weeks. It is a full-time year used so a general counsel can see the invoice as a salary. It is not a utilization rate from the survey.

CLOC’s 2 March 2026 release, drawn from the 2025 Harbor law-department survey, is why the gap is being argued now. Departments expecting an increase in outside-counsel spend fell from 58 percent to 37 percent. Regulatory workload was up for 63 percent and cybersecurity for 58 percent. Inside spend increases were expected by 47 percent, and attorney headcount growth by 32 percent. The work is not shrinking. The default of sending it out is. An eDiscovery project manager is one of the seats a general counsel adds when the hourly stops being the release valve. The legal operations salary page prices the operator ladder beside this seat. It does not price discovery.

The company is already paying for this work. The requisition is where it pretends the work is a survey median.
On the invoice
04 The seat

Three different jobs wear this title.

A Relativity administrator, a matter manager, and a discovery director do not share a band. The title on the requisition is how the gap gets opened.

Base 2026 cash floor for the seat
+
Target bonus Often missing on the firm side
vs
Vendor hour Already on the invoice
Platform administrator
  • Runs the workspace, the users, and the load
  • Does not own the review protocol
  • Gets priced off a coordinator or paralegal cell
  • Fails the interview that asks about a second request
Matter project manager
  • Owns processing, hosting, review flow, and the vendor
  • Sits with litigation or legal operations
  • Is the 2026 corporate band in the table
  • Is who the $100–$200 hourly is already buying

The Electronic Discovery Reference Model is the map of the work: identification through production. A project manager on that map coordinates collections, processing, hosting, review staffing, and production deadlines with outside counsel. A platform certificate shows the person can drive the software. It does not show that the person has held a privilege log, a TAR protocol, or a regulator’s deadline. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34 are why the deadline exists. They do not set the salary.

Law firms, vendors, and companies hire the title for different perimeters. The firm manager is often billed, in part, back to the client, which is why 8 of 15 law-firm interviewees in our January 2024–June 2026 cohort had no target bonus at all. The vendor manager’s base is lower because the employer sells the hour. Of 9 vendor interviewees, 6 had priced a move in-house and the median base increase they required was $24,000. Added to the vendor median of $128,000, that requirement lands at $152,000, inside the corporate band and $4,000 under the corporate interview median of $156,000.

The legal-project-manager brief is a third job again: budgets, realization, and matter process inside a firm or a legal department, not a discovery workflow. That pay is on the legal project manager page. Do not average it with this table.

01

Corporate project manager

Owns the matter from collection to production and the vendor who used to own it. 2026 base sits on the Washington GS-14 scale, not on the May 2025 occupation median.

02

Law-firm manager

Often has no target bonus. Stated base in our cohort clusters at the January 2026 GS-13 Step 5 cell. The firm still bills a professional hour for the work.

03

Director

Owns the function, not a single matter. Director requisitions we priced opened above the project-manager band. Do not post a director scope at a project-manager floor.

05 Both sides of the table

The person paid, and the company paying.

Same band. Different mistake. Switch sides.

Compare the offer with the seat you will actually run, and with the hour your current employer bills for you.

What to test Why it moves the number
Is the base inside the 2026 band for your seat, or inside a paralegal cell? May 2025 paralegal median is $62,890. That is a different occupation.
Is there a target bonus, or a discretionary year-end amount? On the firm side, most of our cohort had no target at all.
Does the scope say administrator, or matter owner? An administrator title at a matter-owner interview is how offers die after the number was already agreed.
What hourly does your current firm or vendor bill for this work? Summer 2025, 51 percent of respondents were at $100–$200. Your base should be read against that invoice, not against SOC 13-1082.
Which metro is the seat in? New York, Washington, and Boston stated bases in our cohort sat above Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta.

Price the requisition off the invoice you already approve, then test it against the January 2026 federal grade, not against a national project-manager median.

Calibration input What it sets
Hours of project-management support bought last year, times the rate Whether an in-house base is a saving or a title change
GS-13 versus GS-14 on the January 2026 Washington table Whether the seat is a manager or a director
Reporting line: legal operations, litigation, or the GC Which of the four 2026 bands is honest
First-year total cash, not base alone The retained fee is 25–30 percent of that total. The retainer is 30 percent of the fee.
Replacement term Six months on this seat. Twelve months is reserved for GC, CLO, and CCO searches.
06 Sartori & Partners data

What our interviews and our searches show.

One interview cohort. One search count. The legal-operations book is the parent of the corporate slice only.

$102,320
May 2025 median annual wage for project management specialists, all industries. The number a requisition copies when the seat has not been priced.
BLS OOH, SOC 13-1082, May 2025
$19,465
How far the January 2026 Washington GS-13 Step 1 salary of $121,785 sits above that May 2025 median.
OPM Salary Table 2026-DCB minus BLS May 2025 median
51%
Share of 70 Summer 2025 ComplexDiscovery and EDRM respondents who priced eDiscovery project-management support at $100 to $200 an hour.
ComplexDiscovery OÜ with EDRM, Summer 2025

From January 2024 through June 2026, Sartori & Partners ran 46 structured interviews with US eDiscovery project managers and litigation-support managers. The cohort median stated base was $146,000. The same cohort splits three ways, and the three medians are not a weighted average of each other: 22 people in corporate legal departments reported a median stated base of $156,000 and a median target bonus of 12%; 15 in law-firm litigation support reported $138,000; 9 at vendors or ALSPs reported $128,000 and a median target of 10%. 22 plus 15 plus 9 is 46.

Inside the 22 corporate interviews, metro is the spread. 11 in New York, Washington, and Boston reported a median stated base of $168,000. 8 in Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta reported $142,000. 3 elsewhere reported $149,000. 11 plus 8 plus 3 is 22. The $142,000 median is the one that falls $3,000 under a 2026 offer floor of $145,000. A lateral that is not a raise stalls there.

The salary gap shows up as a written number, not as a mood. Of the 46, 31 had received a written base from an employer. The median gap was $19,000, with the company’s first figure below current base. 9 of those 31 were opened at or below $110,000, next to the May 2025 mean of $110,740. None of those 9 reported accepting. That is the market’s offer, reported by the people who received it. It is not our offer band.

Searches are a smaller book than interviews. From January 2022 through September 2026 we closed 7 eDiscovery project-manager searches. 4 were corporate seats and sit inside the 12 legal-operations placements since 2017. 3 were law-firm litigation-support managers and are not inside those 12. The legal-operations book as a whole runs to a shortlist in 20 days and an accepted offer in 9 weeks. This slice ran slower: 26 days to shortlist and 11 weeks to an accepted offer. 6 of the 7 accepted the first written offer, below the firm-wide 96 percent acceptance rate on in-house offers. 3 of the 7 received a counter-offer. 2 of those 3 accepted anyway. 1, a law-firm litigation-support manager, declined.

The part that does not flatter us: in 4 of the 7, the hiring manager declined the first shortlist because the requisition described a platform administrator and the interviews tested matter strategy. The band was not the objection. The brief was. We rewrote the brief and continued. On the corporate slice, 3 of the 4 had been in seat long enough, by September 2026, for a 12-month check, and all 3 were still in post. The fourth had not reached 12 months. 3 is too small a base to set next to the firm-wide 97 percent retention at 12 months, and we do not pretend it does. Director scope is a different count: 6 requisitions priced from January 2024 through June 2026, median opening base $190,000, not part of the 46 and not part of the 7.

Occupation surveyparalegal · generic project manager
The titled seatcorporate · firm · vendor
Director scopethe function, not one matter
In 4 of 7 searches the first shortlist failed because the requisition described a tool, and the interview asked about a matter.
On the first shortlist
07 A closed search

A NASDAQ life-sciences company in New Jersey.

One corporate seat inside the legal-operations book. The clock and the letter, without the company’s name.

The general counsel of a NASDAQ-listed life-sciences company in New Jersey had been buying eDiscovery project management from the outside panel. Hosting and processing were not the fight. The fight was a project manager on the invoice at a rate inside the band 51 percent of Summer 2025 respondents reported, on matters that were not going to stop. CLOC’s March 2026 finding, that only 37 percent of departments still expected outside-counsel spend to rise, matched the instruction the GC had already been given: bring the hour inside.

The first version of the role copied a project-manager survey. That version would have opened near the May 2025 median of $102,320 and would have joined the 9 written bases in our interview cohort that opened at or below $110,000 and were not accepted. We priced the seat on the 2026 corporate band. The shortlist went out on day 26, the same as the median of the 7 searches. The accepted offer landed in week 13, 2 weeks slower than the 11-week median, because the hiring manager had to take the letter back through finance after the survey number was already in the budget file. Base was $162,000. Target bonus was 12%, the same as the corporate interview median. Both sit inside the 2026 corporate band. The hire had not reached 12 months by September 2026.

The general counsel’s account of the letter, given after acceptance:

We had priced the seat off a project-manager survey. The person who could run a second-request review would not move for that number. The letter we closed on matched the vendor invoice, divided by a year.
General counsel, NASDAQ-listed life sciences, New Jersey

The fee on a search of this kind is 25–30 percent of total first-year compensation. The retainer is 30 percent of the fee, paid at engagement. Replacement on this seat is six months. Twelve months applies to general counsel, chief legal officer, and chief compliance officer searches, not here. Companies that want the band tested against a live requisition should start at contact or talk, or with the eDiscovery recruiting desk. The adjacent operator search is legal operations recruiting.

08 Sources

The documents behind the anchors.

Occupation wages, the federal schedule, the Summer 2025 pricing survey, and the March 2026 legal-operations demand release. No salary site. No search firm.

The $180,000, $270,000, and $360,000 annual figures are $100, $150, and $200 multiplied by 1,800. The $95, $1,120, $5,940, $19,465, $41,593, and $57,350 gaps are subtractions of the public figures in the table. Sartori bands, interview medians, and the closed searches are Sartori & Partners records. The legal-operations parent figures — 12 legal-operations placements since 2017, 20 days, 9 weeks — and the fee, retainer, acceptance rate, and 12-month retention rate are the firm figures used on the corporate search pages.

eDiscovery project manager salary: questions

What is the ediscovery project manager salary in 2026?

The ediscovery project manager salary in 2026 sits above the May 2025 BLS median of $102,320. A US corporate seat is $145,000–$175,000 base in 2026, plus a 10–15% target bonus. That band is the offer Sartori & Partners uses, not the occupation survey.

Why does a project-manager survey underprice an eDiscovery project manager?

A May 2025 project-manager median of $102,320 is $19,465 under the January 2026 Washington GS-13 Step 1 salary of $121,785. The survey prices an occupation. The seat prices discovery judgment on live matters.

What should a company budget for an in-house eDiscovery project manager?

Budget $145,000–$175,000 base for a 2026 US corporate eDiscovery project manager, plus a 10–15% target bonus. Across 22 corporate interviewees from January 2024 through June 2026, median stated base was $156,000.

How does vendor hourly pricing compare with an in-house base?

In the Summer 2025 ComplexDiscovery and EDRM survey, 51 percent of 70 respondents priced project-management support at $100 to $200 an hour. At 1,800 hours that band is $180,000 to $360,000, against a May 2025 median salary of $102,320.

How long does an eDiscovery project manager search take?

Across 7 eDiscovery project-manager searches from January 2022 through September 2026, the median was 26 days to a shortlist and 11 weeks to an accepted offer. 6 of the 7 accepted the first written offer.

Is this the same pay as a paralegal or a generic project manager?

No: the May 2025 paralegal median is $62,890 and the project-manager median is $102,320, and neither is the 2026 corporate band of $145,000–$175,000. Legal-operations pay and the legal-project-manager brief are separate pages.

Start a conversation

Pricing an eDiscovery project manager?

Send the requisition, the vendor hourly, and the reporting line. We will put the 2026 band against that invoice. Retained search, companies only.