>

Salary benchmarks · United States 2026

Lawyer Salary 2026: How Much Lawyers Make by Seniority, Firm Type and State

The first number a lawyer and a general counsel both actually read is a dated 2026 cell. Four public tables, May through July 2026, disagree on the same question. This page is that national table: seniority, firm type, and state.

Hire legal talent Submit your CV
01 Start here

How much do lawyers make in 2026 is four dated cells, not one.

Across 1,675 structured interviews with New York associates and counsel, the cell that closed a file was the one a general counsel could take to a compensation committee in the same week the lawyer could defend it at home. This page is that national table.

Lens 01 · The payroll blend National median, wage-and-salary lawyers: $159,670.

The Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey for May 2025, released 15 May 2026, puts the U.S. median annual wage for lawyers (SOC 23-1011) at $159,670. It mixes law firms, companies and government. It is not a lockstep class year. The cell a company already pays, on average.

Four dated cells, four universes. A compensation committee that copies one into a requisition written for another has not set a salary. It has set a stall. Vintages and instruments sit in the source list.

1,374,720
Active U.S. lawyers in 2025, up 1.38 percent from 1,355,963 in 2024 — licenses, not jobs and not pay.
ABA National Lawyer Population Survey 2025, via ABA Journal 9 December 2025 and Law.com 8 December 2025
754,500
Wage-and-salary lawyer jobs in the May 2025 OEWS — a different universe from the ABA license count.
BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics Table 1, released 15 May 2026
92.8%
Class of 2025 employment rate as of 16 March 2026, second-highest on NALP's series, on a class that itself shrank 7.0 percent.
NALP, Employment for the Class of 2025 — Selected Findings, 5 August 2026
63%
Share of 1,049 chief legal officers who expected legal-department headcount to stay stable in 2026.
2026 ACC Chief Legal Officers Survey key findings, January 2026
Four public universes behind the 2026 lawyer-pay question. Each row is a different unit, vintage and use — not a column to add. A general counsel who collapses two rows writes a band nobody can sign.
Universe What it counts Vintage What a paying company uses it for
BLS OEWS Wage-and-salary lawyer jobs in covered nonfarm establishments (SOC 23-1011) May 2025 survey, released 15 May 2026 The payroll cell a company already pays, mixed across firms, companies and government
ABA NLPS Active licenses reported by state bars 2025 survey, published December 2025 Headcount of who may practice — not hours, not pay, not jobs
NALP associate survey Office-reported associate base salaries, years 1–8, by firm-size band As of 1 January 2025, released 28 May 2025 The seniority x firm-type ladder inside private practice, before the June 2026 lockstep move
Published lockstep memos Class-year base at firms that published or were reported as matching Announced 2 June 2026, effective 1 July 2026 The invoice cell a general counsel meets on a New York or D.C. panel — not a national median
OPM General Schedule, GS-0905 Statutory GS locality rates for federal attorneys Calendar 2026; locality frozen at 2025 percentages The federal payroll cell; it does not move with the June lockstep

Sartori has worked the New York associate line for more than 10 years. Typical time-to-fill on that line is 6 to 12 weeks. The 33 closed searches behind the accordion are mandates, not interviews; the interview book is the city cohort already named. What the public tables cannot tell a chief legal officer is which of the four cells the other desk will walk in with. That is the rest of this page.

The first number both desks can defend is the only number that closes.
Lorenzo Sartori, 3 September 2026
02 Seniority and firm type

The ladder a paying company actually meets is size-banded, not lockstep.

NALP's 2025 Associate Salary Survey is the seniority-by-firm-type table this national page owns. It is office-reported base as of 1 January 2025, released 28 May 2025 — before the June 2026 lockstep move.

NALP published the 2025 Associate Salary Survey on 28 May 2025 from 437 responding offices. Eighty-seven percent sat in firms of more than 250 lawyers, so the overall median leans large. NALP also flags that the respondent pool changes year to year. Treat the cells as a dated office survey, not as a census of every U.S. associate. First-year size-band markers sit on the scale below; years 1–8 sit in the sortable table.

The modal first-year nationally was still $225,000 as of that 1 January 2025 snapshot — 32.0 percent of offices, 44.7 percent of 701-plus offices. It had not yet become the median even at the largest band. That is the number a fifth-year later leaving a lockstep office will remember as “the scale.” It is not the number a general counsel outside those large-firm offices should paste into an offer letter.

NALP U.S. Associate Salary Survey, medians as of 1 January 2025, rounded as published in the 2025 participants’ summary. Office-reported associate base by year of practice and firm-size band. Click a column header to re-rank. This is not the June 2026 lockstep grid.
Associate year 250 or fewer 251–700 701+ All sizes
First $150,000 $190,000 $215,000 $200,000
Second $157,500 $191,250 $225,000 $210,000
Third $161,250 $205,000 $250,000 $220,625
Fourth $172,500 $220,000 $291,250 $238,125
Fifth $180,000 $235,000 $315,000 $255,000
Sixth $195,000 $250,000 $340,000 $271,175
Seventh $200,000 $260,000 $360,000 $286,700
Eighth $197,500 $318,750 $375,000 $330,000

Eighth-year median in the smallest band ($197,500) sits below seventh-year ($200,000) in the same band — a published survey cell, not a ladder glitch to “correct.” At 701-plus, reported averages ranged from $143,000–$225,000 in the first year to $201,500–$435,000 in the eighth; the $435,000 ceiling was the then-prevailing lockstep, not the July 2026 $455,000. Source: NALP 2025 participants’ summary.

First-year associate base by firm-size band, NALP as of 1 January 2025. The overall median ($200,000) sits between the 251–700 and 701-plus cells. The $225,000 marker is the national mode, not the median.
NALP size-band first-year medians
$140K$240K

250 or fewer lawyers

Median first-year base, 48 reporting offices, as of 1 January 2025.

NALP 2025 U.S. Associate Salary Survey ↗

Outside the 19 major-market cities NALP tracks, regional first-year medians as of 1 January 2025 sat at $181,900 in the West, $170,000 in the Northeast, and $160,000 in the South and the Midwest. A head of legal in those regions who copies a New York lockstep cell is not matching a local office survey. They are importing a different market.

Entry-level shape is bimodal, and that is a different finding from the OEWS stock median. NALP’s Class of 2025 Selected Findings, as of 16 March 2026, recorded 50.0 percent of 22,715 reported full-time salaries between $60,000 and $100,000, while $225,000 was 21.5 percent of all reported salaries and 34.4 percent of law-firm salaries. Private-practice median for that class was $155,000 (a mix shift, NALP says, not a lockstep cut). Government $81,000; public interest $75,000; judicial clerkships $72,533; business $100,000. The business cell is not an experienced general-counsel band: only 34.4 percent of Class of 2025 business jobs were bar-required, and in-house lawyer roles were 23.7 percent of that sector.

03 State rows

The state row is the payroll the company already runs.

O*NET republishes BLS May 2025 wages by jurisdiction. These medians are wage-and-salary lawyers in that geography — the cell a head of HR already pays — not a lockstep class year.

Lawyer median annual wage by selected jurisdiction, BLS May 2025 wages as republished by O*NET. The national median is the decoder cell in §01; it is not repeated as a bar.

O*NET local-wage pages for each jurisdiction, citing Bureau of Labor Statistics 2025 wage data.

New York’s median of $207,860 sits inside a 10th-to-90th band of $85,200 to $391,420, O*NET recorded from the same BLS 2025 file; the New York-Newark-Jersey City MSA median is $208,880. Mississippi’s median of $91,690 sits inside $47,670 to $176,750. That is not a cost-of-living footnote. It is two different payrolls. A chief legal officer running a multi-state department who posts one national number has not posted a band. They have posted an argument.

Metro splits inside a state are large enough to break a requisition. O*NET puts San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara at $301,320 against Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim at $194,410, both in California’s $195,080 statewide median. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington at $168,510 sits above Texas’s $154,200; Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos at $153,330 sits on it; Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands at $157,980 sits between. Florida’s $133,180 statewide median becomes $160,320 in Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach. The California and New York sibling pages own those states as thesis; here they are rows.

Nationally, O*NET’s BLS 2025 percentiles run $78,360 (10th), $102,990 (25th), $221,370 (75th) and $351,600 (90th). The June 2026 lockstep eighth-year base of $455,000 sits above that 90th percentile. A derived reading, not a third survey: the published senior-associate lockstep is outside the OEWS wage-and-salary distribution that a company uses to describe “what lawyers make.” The OEWS 90th is still a blend of firms, companies and government. It is not a rebuttal of the memo. It is why the memo and the median cannot share a requisition.

Where the $225,000 first-year office actually sat, as of NALP’s 1 January 2025 survey: 54.8 percent of offices reporting that average were in six markets — Washington, D.C. area 13.0 percent, New York City 11.3, Los Angeles/Orange County 10.4, Houston 7.0, San Francisco 7.0, Dallas 6.1. Share of offices in each city paying $225,000 (cities with at least six reporting offices) ran from 72.7 percent in San Francisco (11 offices) to 0.0 percent in Nashville and Northern New Jersey/Newark. New York City: 56.5 percent of 23 offices. A general counsel in Minneapolis (11.1 percent) who assumes “large firm means $225,000” is reading a different city’s table.

04 Two desks

The lawyer who earns the cell and the general counsel who pays it are not reading the same column.

BLS still puts most U.S. lawyer jobs in legal services. The Class of 2025 pipeline is more firm-heavy than the stock. The company desk pays a salary and an invoice, often in the same quarter.

Class of 2025 first jobs by employer type, NALP as of 16 March 2026. This is the pipeline into the 2026 first-year cell, not the ABA license stock.

NALP, Class of 2025 National Summary Report and Selected Findings, 5 August 2026.

The 2026 first-year cell is filled from a firm-heavy pipeline, and almost always as an associate title.

Of 19,869 Class of 2025 private-practice jobs, firms of 501-plus lawyers took 6,588 (33.2 percent) and firms of 1–10 took 26.4 percent — the fifth consecutive year in which the largest band hired more graduates than the smallest, NALP’s National Summary Report recorded. Job type on 19,731 firm jobs: associate / entry-level attorney 18,606 (94.3 percent). The $225,000 cell in that survey window is the 501-plus associate cell (median $225,000 on 6,017 salaries). Staff attorney, law clerk and paralegal titles are rounding error on that pipeline, not an alternative pay table.

The stock is less firm-heavy than the pipeline. BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook figures for 2024 put 51 percent of U.S. lawyer jobs in legal services, 12 percent self-employed, and 19 percent in government (local 8, state 6, federal 5). The residual is the corporate and other-industry in-house stock a sitting general counsel actually manages. Newly hired attorneys start as associates, BLS writes; some later move into an organization’s legal department as in-house counsel. The 2026 pay table has to show both journeys or it is a firm brochure.

Summer 2025 recruiting, NALP Perspectives (26 January 2026): average 2L summer class of eight per office, the smallest since 2020; 6,069 Class of 2026 students in those programs; New York City average 29 per office. Offer-to-return 97 percent; acceptance 89.4 percent. For 2026 2L summer, 80 percent of offers came from employer-sponsored recruiting rather than school-sponsored OCI, 85 percent of offers went out before July, and median offers per office hit four. The lockstep first-year cell is filled from a shrinking, earlier, employer-run pipeline concentrated in a handful of city offices. A candidate who is not in that pipeline is not being paid “below market.” They are in a different market.

The same general counsel writes a payroll line and a panel invoice, and the 2026 CLO survey says the invoice is the growth cell.

The 2026 ACC Chief Legal Officers Survey (key findings, ACC authorship only; 20 industries, 43 countries) recorded 84 percent of chief legal officers reporting directly to the CEO, and 34 percent using the Chief Legal Officer title. Majority oversight of compliance (64 percent) and corporate secretary (62 percent). Seventy-nine percent almost always attend board meetings. Thirty-six percent were already in active generative-AI deployment. AI regulation was a fastest-growing priority for 24 percent. Top barrier: budget and resource constraints at 35 percent. CEO-expected skill: technology and AI proficiency at 47 percent. None of that is a cash table. It is why the cash table on the company side is a headcount decision plus an invoice decision.

Forty-eight percent of those chief legal officers increased outside-counsel use. Thomson Reuters Institute, with Georgetown Law, wrote in the January 2026 State of the U.S. Legal Market (184-firm Financial Insights sample; about 2,500 legal buyers at organizations with revenue above $50 million) that general counsel shifted routine and moderately complex work to firms charging in many cases 40 percent less than the Am Law 100; average Am Law 100 standard rates cracked $1,000 in 2025 against about $600 elsewhere; clients spent less per hour on the average legal service in 2025 than in 2024 even as worked rates grew 7.3 percent in that paired text. The Law Firm Rates Report 2026 (20 October 2025) put worked-rate growth at 7.4 percent against inflation of 2.8 percent. Midsize firms took the bulk of 2025 demand growth. A head of legal who freezes in-house headcount and still has a 2026 M&A or trade file is buying the lockstep cell by the hour.

There is no clean, recruiter-free, 2026 public table of U.S. general-counsel total cash by company revenue in the research behind this page. The in-house bands live on the in-house counsel salary page and the general counsel salary page. This national table will not invent a third. What a paying chief legal officer can be told here: the company already pays an OEWS-distributed wage on payroll, and it buys hours at the Thomson Reuters rate bands above. Mixing those two into one “lawyer salary” is how a 2026 requisition stalls.

A general counsel who budgets the OEWS median against a lockstep candidate has not opened a search. They have opened a stall.
Lorenzo Sartori, 3 September 2026
05 What priced 2026

Two demand shocks priced the table at the same time.

A federal civilian hiring freeze removed entry-level GS-0905 seats. A tariff-plus-M&A cycle filled trade, antitrust and large-cap deal seats at firms and in-house. The 2026 pay cells moved with those files, not with a single national raise.

NALP’s Class of 2025, as of 16 March 2026, is the measured hiring consequence of the 20 January 2025 Presidential Memorandum on a federal civilian hiring freeze. Federal government jobs excluding clerkships: 692 versus 1,099 (−37.0 percent). Honors: 50 versus 317. Public interest: 2,945 (−13.9 percent). Clerkships were not frozen; they still fell 8.3 percent to 3,253. The class numbered 36,206 graduates. The Department of Justice’s own legal-careers page still describes the Attorney General’s Honors Program as the only way to join DOJ directly out of law school. The 2026 cycle, eligibility updated 27 August 2026, ran 28 August to 8 September 2026 — a narrow, citizenship-gated window, not a restored pipeline. Executive Order 14210 (11 February 2025) then capped non-exempt replacement at one hire for every four departures and directed large-scale reductions in force. The GS-0905 cell in the 2026 table is a retention problem, not a hiring boom.

On the company side, the Supreme Court held on 20 February 2026 in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that IEEPA does not authorize the tariffs at issue. The same day, Executive Order 14389 terminated those additional IEEPA duties while leaving Section 232 and Section 301 duties in place, and a proclamation imposed a 10 percent ad valorem temporary import surcharge under section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 for 150 days, effective 24 February 2026. The ACC survey had already named trade and tariffs as the fastest-growing regulatory priority (30 percent of responding chief legal officers). The desk that pays for that file is mid-level in-house trade and firm international-trade / Court of International Trade counsel through 2026, not a first-year lockstep seat. Headcount, on the same survey, was expected to stay flat. The spike is an invoice.

Merger review swung in the same season. Trump v. Slaughter, decided 29 June 2026, held the FTC Act’s for-cause removal provision contrary to the separation of powers, so commission-side merger review and consumer-protection enforcement can move with the White House. The FTC Premerger Notification Office, updated 23 March 2026, recorded that a district-court vacatur of the 2025 HSR form took effect when the Fifth Circuit denied a stay on 19 March 2026; agencies now accept the form in place before 10 February 2025. FY 2025 HSR, released 2 July 2026: companies notified 2,006 transactions, about 31.8 percent valued above $1 billion; 18 combined merger-enforcement actions. LSEG Deals Intelligence, 12 August 2026: announced U.S.-target M&A of $1.69 trillion for January–July 2026, the strongest opening seven months on that series, inside $3.19 trillion globally (+36 percent) on a deal count down 10 percent. Forty-eight mega-deals above $10 billion accounted for about 40 percent of global value. The seat that is busy is senior M&A and antitrust, not a mass of small-HSR associates.

Court filings named the other 2025 practices a general counsel actually bought. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, for the year ending 31 March 2025, reported bankruptcy petitions of 529,080 (+13 percent), immigration criminal defendants of 29,775 (+40 percent, 89 percent in five southwestern border districts), intellectual-property filings up 9 percent with patents up 24 percent, and antitrust civil filings up 73 percent to 772. District civil filings fell 22 percent on an MDL unwind, not on a collapse of the litigation desk. Thomson Reuters’ 2025 hours (average-firm demand +1.9 percent for the year, peaking at 4.4 percent in July) named M&A, litigation, real estate, corporate and labor and employment as elevated, and IP patent prosecution as negative. Citi’s 9-month 2025 flash survey (185 firms) put demand at +1.9 percent, rates +9.6 percent, revenue +11.3 percent, headcount +2.9 percent, equity-partner headcount −0.5 percent, income-partner headcount +6 percent, leverage +4.3 percent. The 2026 pay table’s growth seats are the upper associate, counsel and income-partner cells. Equity partner is not. Partner-pay dollars belong on a sibling page; the mix belongs here because it tells a chief legal officer which seniority to budget.

Two timing constraints sit on who can occupy the 2026 first-year cell at all. NextGen UBE’s first administration is July 2026, in a first wave that includes Connecticut, Maryland, Missouri, Oregon and Washington; New York and Florida will not accept NextGen transfer scores from administrations before July 2028, NCBE’s table updated 16 July 2026. That is a start-date and bar-admission constraint, not a creator of lawyer demand. USPTO registration under 37 C.F.R. § 11.7 remains the patent-prosecution gate; the patent-pay table is a sibling. AI policy in 2025–2026 created regulatory work without a federal licensing regime: Executive Order 14365 (11 December 2025) directed an AI Litigation Task Force at the Department of Justice, and Executive Order 14409 (2 June 2026) kept frontier-model access voluntary. Combined with a stable-headcount CLO read, that is another invoice, not a wave of junior in-house associates.

06 The New York read

The cell that closed a New York file was the one both desks could defend.

Sartori's New York associate mandate telemetry and the city interview cohort are the proprietary read. Public tables say what the cells are. The file says which cell the other desk walked in with.

Of 412 respondents in that New York cohort sitting inside company legal departments over a 24-month window, 58 percent told Sartori the first number their general counsel actually budgeted against was an outside-counsel rate card, not an OEWS median. A chief legal officer at a PE-backed industrial platform put it without romance: the compensation committee does not meet a lockstep memo. It meets the role.

Of 186 respondents in the same cohort sitting as associates at 501-plus offices over that 24-month window, 71 percent said the number on their last offer letter was the lockstep cell, not the NALP size-band median. They are not lying, and they are not describing the national table. They are describing one published memo. A head of talent at a U.S. lockstep office (tier and type only) told us the summer pipeline is now the offer: if the candidate was not in the employer-run 2L class, the first-year cell is not the conversation they are having. Two desks, two cells, one requisition that has to pick.

Mandate telemetry on the New York associate line is a smaller instrument, as it must be. Of 33 closed associate searches over the trailing three years, 19 were company-side (in-house or hybrid company legal) and 14 were firm-side. Of those 19 company-side files, 11 stalled at least once because the approved band had been written against an OEWS median or a 2025 NALP cell while the candidate was sitting on a 2026 lockstep. We do not talk those files through by search craft. The company rewrites the band, or the search is not a search. That is the finding that does not flatter the method. Counter-offer incidence on the line is 37 percent. Median offer-to-acceptance is 11 working days, once the number is one both desks can defend. Completion on the line is 93 percent. The stalled company-side files ran to the far edge of the 6-to-12-week band and, in several, reopened after the rewrite.

A PE-backed industrial platform in the Midwest opened a fifth-year commercial-counsel search onto the company payroll. The approved band had been built from a national OEWS-shaped midpoint. The shortlist was sitting in 701-plus lockstep offices. The file stalled through nine weeks of a planned 6-to-12-week search. It closed after the chief legal officer took a rewritten range to the compensation committee; the accepted offer was signed in 11 working days. No lockstep memo was “matched.” A company cell was written that a lockstep leaver could defend at home and a committee could defend in minutes. Composite, anonymized, inside the envelope.

A public-company legal department opened a trade-counsel brief after the February 2026 IEEPA holding, with headcount frozen in the ACC pattern. The first instruction was to buy hours. Refund rights, Section 122 surcharge work through July 2026, and standing 232/301 files turned the matter from a project into a desk. The in-house seat filled in eight weeks once the general counsel stopped treating the invoice as a substitute for a signature. The candidate was mid-level, not a first-year. The 2026 national table’s lockstep floor was context on the buy-out math, not the offer. Composite, anonymized, inside the envelope.

What the New York book cannot see, and will not pretend to: a national general-counsel cash table by revenue, industry and metro. Coverage of the New York market is a mapping figure stated separately, not a pay census. Quarterly surveys have run since 2019; they do not mint a GC band this page declined to guess. If the brief is an experienced in-house chair rather than an associate-line cell, the operational counterpart is in-house and general counsel search. If the brief is still an associate-year hire, it is associate recruiting. Methodology for how city figures are built sits on the methodology page.

Questions both desks ask of the 2026 table

How much do lawyers make in 2026 in the United States?

The May 2025 OEWS, released 15 May 2026, puts the national median wage for wage-and-salary lawyers at $159,670. That cell is not the lockstep, not a new-graduate median, and not federal GS pay. NALP’s Class of 2025 national median was $100,000 as of 16 March 2026. Matching lockstep firms moved the first-year base to $235,000 effective 1 July 2026. Calendar-2026 GS-15 steps in New York-Newark and Washington-Baltimore cap at $197,200. Read the four as four tables. A general counsel who collapses them writes a band nobody can sign.

What is the average lawyer salary in 2026?

The May 2025 OEWS mean for wage-and-salary lawyers was $185,840, against a median of $159,670, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on 15 May 2026. The mean sits above the median because the right tail is long: O*NET, citing the same BLS 2025 wage data, puts the 90th percentile at $351,600. Neither figure is a lockstep class-year base, and neither is what a new graduate reported to NALP. Ask which average, on which universe, in which year.

How does lawyer pay change by seniority and firm size in 2026?

As of 1 January 2025, NALP’s Associate Salary Survey put first-year medians at $150,000 in offices of 250 or fewer lawyers, $190,000 at 251–700, and $215,000 at 701-plus. Eighth-year medians in the same survey ran $197,500 / $318,750 / $375,000. That ladder is office-reported base, not the June 2026 lockstep. A general counsel hiring a fifth-year from a 701-plus office is not hiring against the OEWS median.

How much does a general counsel pay on the payroll versus on a firm invoice?

There is no recruiter-free 2026 public table of U.S. general-counsel total cash by company revenue, so this page does not guess one. What is dated: 63 percent of 1,049 chief legal officers expected headcount to stay flat, and 48 percent increased outside-counsel use, the 2026 ACC CLO Survey recorded. Thomson Reuters Institute wrote in January 2026 that average Am Law 100 standard rates cracked $1,000 in 2025 against about $600 elsewhere, and that clients moved routine work to firms charging in many cases 40 percent less. The company pays both cells. They are not the same number.

Do attorney salaries vary by state in 2026?

Yes. O*NET’s republication of BLS May 2025 wages puts New York’s lawyer median at $207,860 and Mississippi’s at $91,690. California sat at $195,080, the District of Columbia at $195,190, Texas at $154,200, Florida at $133,180. Those are OEWS wage-and-salary medians, not lockstep bases. Scale firms generally post the same class-year base in New York, Washington, Houston and San Francisco; the state row is what a company already pays on its own payroll.

What does a federal attorney earn in calendar 2026?

GS-15 steps 5–10 in New York-Newark and steps 6–10 in Washington-Baltimore cap at $197,200, the Executive Schedule IV ceiling. OPM published a 1.0 percent across-the-board GS increase with locality percentages frozen at 2025 levels, effective 11 January 2026. That cell does not move with the June lockstep. The 20 January 2025 federal civilian hiring freeze then removed most Honors / entry-level GS-0905 seats: NALP counted 50 Honors jobs for the Class of 2025 against 317 the year before.

07 Sources

BLS, NALP, OPM, ABA, ACC and the 2026 lockstep memos.

Each public cell on this page carries its vintage in the sentence that uses it. The New York findings come from Sartori's city research program and from the associate-line files cited above.

Surveys, wage tables, dockets and published memos

47 references
  1. Sartori & Partners — New York Legal Talent Research Programme (1,675 structured interviews; ~67,000 lawyers mapped; quarterly surveys since 2019; mandate telemetry) sartoriglobal.com ↗
  2. Occupational Employment and Wages Summary (USDL-26-0725) bls.gov ↗
  3. Table 1. National employment and wage data from the Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey by occupation, May 2025 bls.gov ↗
  4. National Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  5. New York Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  6. California Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  7. District of Columbia Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  8. Texas Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  9. Florida Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  10. Massachusetts Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  11. Illinois Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  12. Colorado Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  13. New Jersey Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  14. Mississippi Wages: 23-1011.00 — Lawyers onetonline.org ↗
  15. Lawyers : Occupational Outlook Handbook bls.gov ↗
  16. Despite Expectations, $225,000 Entry Associate Salaries Lag at Large Law Firms nalp.org ↗
  17. 2025 U.S. Associate Salary Survey Special Report to Survey Participants nalp.org ↗
  18. $225,000 Entry-Level Salaries Not Yet the Standard at Large Firms nalp.org ↗
  19. Employment for the Class of 2025 — Selected Findings nalp.org ↗
  20. Class of 2025 National Summary Report nalp.org ↗
  21. Number of US lawyers increases for first time since 2020, is up 5.6% over 10-year period, ABA report says abajournal.com ↗
  22. US Lawyer Head Count Reaches All-Time High law.com ↗
  23. Milbank, McDermott Raise Associate Salaries Up to $455,000 (1) news.bloomberglaw.com ↗
  24. ALERT: Milbank Does It Again — Associate Salaries Are Going Up!!! abovethelaw.com ↗
  25. Associate Compensation Scorecard: The 2026 Summer Of Salary Increases abovethelaw.com ↗
  26. Waiting On Cravath: Biglaw's Salary Silence Is Getting Ridiculous abovethelaw.com ↗
  27. Cravath kicks off associate bonus season and other firms follow abajournal.com ↗
  28. Biglaw Salary Scale + Bonuses (1968 - 2026) biglawinvestor.com ↗
  29. January 2026 Pay Schedules (OPM notice) govinfo.gov ↗
  30. Salary Table 2026-NY opm.gov ↗
  31. Salary Table 2026-DCB opm.gov ↗
  32. 2026 ACC Chief Legal Officers Survey (key findings) acc.com ↗
  33. 2026 Report on the State of the US Legal Market blogs.thomsonreuters.com ↗
  34. Law Firm Rates Report 2026: Law firms discover the hidden engine driving their pricing power thomsonreuters.com ↗
  35. 2026 Citi Hildebrandt Client Advisory citiglobalwealth.com ↗
  36. Global M&A update: A record-breaking market that's becoming increasingly concentrated lseg.com ↗
  37. Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics 2025 uscourts.gov ↗
  38. Hiring Freeze whitehouse.gov ↗
  39. Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (02/20/2026) supremecourt.gov ↗
  40. Ending Certain Tariff Actions whitehouse.gov ↗
  41. Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems whitehouse.gov ↗
  42. Trump v. Slaughter (06/29/2026) supremecourt.gov ↗
  43. FTC and DOJ Issue Fiscal Year 2025 Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Report ftc.gov ↗
  44. HSR Notification Forms, Instructions and Guidance ftc.gov ↗
  45. Legal Careers — U.S. Department of Justice justice.gov ↗
  46. Position Classification Standard for General Attorney, GS-0905 opm.gov ↗
  47. NextGen UBE Adoption by Jurisdiction ncbex.org ↗

OEWS figures are employer-reported wages for wage-and-salary lawyers in covered establishments. ABA counts are active licenses reported by state bars. NALP associate medians are office-reported bases as of 1 January 2025. Class of 2025 salaries closed before some large firms moved first-year bases to $235,000. Lockstep cells are published firm memos effective 1 July 2026, not a census. GS figures are OPM locality tables for calendar 2026. ACC figures are the 2026 CLO key-findings PDF (ACC authorship only). Thomson Reuters and Citi figures are law-firm financial samples, not lawyer-wage surveys.

Sartori & Partners runs a continuous research program over nearly 1.5 million lawyer profiles mapped globally, with quarterly market surveys since 2019. New York coverage in that mapping book is about 67,000 lawyers. That is density, not a pay average. The associate-line findings above sit in the city cohort and in the closed files. For how we build the city figures, see methodology. For the lockstep as a ladder, the in-house payroll, and the two-desk comparison, use the related pages.

A quiet conversation

Putting a lawyer on the payroll — or still writing the band against the wrong table?

We run U.S. in-house and associate search for general counsel, chief legal officers and heads of HR, and we are as willing to say a 2026 band is written against the wrong universe as to open a mandate. Confidential, no obligation.