The work starts with documents, not names: proxy statements and committee charters for the target board, questionnaires and Section 16 filings for every candidate, auditor and adviser relationships across the previous three years, and the company's own overboarding policy. Rule 10A-3 disqualifies anyone who has taken a consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the issuer, which in San Diego routinely removes the person the committee named first.
We run the independence screen before the approach, not after the shortlist. Across 88 of the 275 structured interviews Sartori held with San Diego sitting directors, audit chairs and general counsel over a 24-month window, 71% told us they had been approached for a seat they were plainly barred from taking.
Sartori's quarterly survey since 2019 puts San Diego counter-offer incidence at 14% on board mandates, with a median of 21 working days from offer to acceptance once indemnification is settled. Not every file closes. One further San Diego board mandate Sartori opened in the same three-year period was abandoned after two shortlists failed the independence screen.
Every specification is written against the disclosure the seat has to carry, the Item 407(d)(5) designation and the Item 106(c)(1) oversight paragraph, and against the meeting calendar the committee actually keeps.