›Summary
Fish & Richardson is mapped by Sartori across 15 offices in 3 countries (International footprint), headquartered in Washington. Headcount band: 250–500 attorneys. Strongest mapped practices: Intellectual Property, Litigation & Disputes, Compliance & Regulatory. It appears in 3 Ranking Atlas pages. Profile compiled from public facts, last verified 23 Jul 2026.
01 — Public record
Facts on file
Compiled from public sources. Figures are shown as bands where exact counts are not published; nothing here is provided by the firm.
Website
Largest mapped office
Washington, US
Professionals
250–500 attorneys banded
Countries covered
3 via 15 offices
Office footprint — mapped metros
15 offices · 3 countriesPrincipal practices
Bold chips mark the firm’s deepest mapped practices (major or strong).
Seniority mix — banded, fee earners
≈225 partners · 30 counsel · 150+ associates
Mapped from public bios and firm pages; exact counts are not published, so figures are shown as approximate bands.
Sartori Firm Index — footprint (a different lens from the Atlas tiers)
International · coverage 3 of 332.9
Composite SFI
SFI sub-index · banded
62.3
Scale
SFI sub-index · banded
9.1
Reach
SFI sub-index · banded
3.9
Hiring
SFI sub-index · banded
The Sartori Firm Index measures footprint and momentum (scale · reach · hiring), not practice quality. It never assigns an Atlas tier, and the Atlas never reuses this number — the two lenses are deliberately separate.
02 — Where this firm is ranked
Ranking Atlas & Firm Index
No composite firm score is published. Atlas tiers are assigned per market or practice from public footprint and evidence; the Firm Index leaderboards are a separate footprint lens.
3 listings · Atlas tiers apply only within their own market or practice
| Listing | Type | Tier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best law firms in Germany | Atlas ranking | Notable in this field | → |
| Best law firms in Munich | Atlas ranking | Notable in this field | → |
| Best law firms in China | Atlas ranking | Notable in this field | → |
03 — Sources & verification Last verified 23 Jul 2026 · next review by 23 Aug 2026 · change log
Public sources
- 1 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 2 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 3 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 4 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 5 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 6 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 7 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 8 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 9 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 10 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 11 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 12 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 13 New York, NY | Intellectual Property - IP Law Firm | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 14 San Diego, CA | Intellectual Property - IP Law Firm | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 15 Silicon Valley, CA | Intellectual Property - IP Law Firm | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 16 Fish & Richardson Introduces 2025 Fall Associate Classfirm_website · 2026-07-21
- 17 Fish & Richardson Introduces 2025 Fall Associate Classfirm_website · 2026-07-21
Know the limits of this data
- —Figures are bands, not audited counts; public sources lag reality by weeks or months.
- —Atlas tiers are Sartori’s independent editorial opinion — not the firm’s claim, and not a client-satisfaction measure.
- —No firm-level numeric score exists; Atlas tiers apply only within their own market or practice.
- —No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input.
Corrections from the firm or its representatives are reviewed within five working days.
Change log
For candidates
Weighing a move to a firm like this?
A named consultant, a confidential read on the market, and evidence — not brochure copy — before you ever make an approach.
Speak confidentially →For law firms
Competing for the same talent?
We map this market daily. Retained search for partners, practice groups and senior associates, run with discretion.
Discuss a mandate →Fish & Richardson is profiled here independently by Sartori. This page is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in cooperation with the firm; firm names are used for identification only and no logo or brand assets are reproduced. Rankings reflect Sartori’s editorial methodology and public mapping — they are not legal advice, nor a recommendation to instruct counsel.