Submit CV Hire Talent

Practice × location ranking

Best Patent Litigation law firms in Texas

Grouped into editorial tiers — words, never scores. No paid placement and no numeric rank; within a tier the order rotates monthly and carries no meaning.

Last verified 22 Jul 2026 · Next review by 22 Aug 2026 · Change log

Direct answer & research summary

Best Patent Litigation law firms in Texas are tiered by Sartori & Partners from public footprint as of July 2026, not from a numeric score: 9 firms sit on this board. Sartori & Partners has completed 400+ placements since 2017 (230+ in-house), including 52 general counsel and chief legal officer searches, with a median of 11 weeks from brief to accepted offer. A NASDAQ-listed medtech in Boston accepted its successor general counsel in week 11, from a shortlist of four at day 24.

01 — The ranking

The Texas Patent Litigation board

A tier on this Texas Patent Litigation board names relative firm standing in words. Placement speaks to infringement suits, competitor patent disputes and high-stakes patent-trial work from the major dockets through the wider state map; order inside each band carries no hierarchy and is not a score.

TEXAS × PATENT LITIGATION9 FIRMS · NO SCORESREV. 2026-07
REFFIRMTEXAS PATENT LITIGATION BANDSIGNAL
TIER 1 — MARKET LEADERS2 FIRMS

The top editorial band for the best Patent Litigation law firms in Texas: firms that set the tone for Patent Litigation mandates at scale in Texas. Within-tier sequence rotates and is not a ranking.

T1·01 Baker Botts25–49 attorneys mapped · major local depth 25–49 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T1·02 Fish & Richardson25–49 attorneys mapped · major local depth 25–49 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
TIER 2 — HIGHLY ACTIVE7 FIRMS

Highly active on the Texas Patent Litigation board means consistent infringement-suit and patent-trial presence and peer recognition short of the leader set. No numeric score is assigned.

T2·01 McKool Smith25–49 attorneys mapped · major local depth 25–49 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·02 Munck Wilson Mandala10–24 attorneys mapped · major local depth 10–24 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·03 Norton Rose Fulbright25–49 attorneys mapped · major local depth 25–49 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·04 Winstead10–24 attorneys mapped · major local depth 10–24 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·05 Blank Rome10–24 attorneys mapped · major local depth 10–24 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·06 Haynes and Boone25–49 attorneys mapped · major local depth 25–49 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓
T2·07 King & Spalding10–24 attorneys mapped · major local depth 10–24 ATTORNEYS FLAT → EVID ↓

All counts are shown as bands, never precise headcounts. Notable firms sit outside the tiers by design: verified minimal presence, not assessed at full tier depth.

Hiring in Texas?

We map this market every day.

The evidence behind these tiers is the same intelligence we use to run retained searches for partners, groups and senior associates.

02 — Evidence, methodology & sources why each firm · how tiers are set · sources · change log · verified 22 Jul 2026 · next review 22 Aug 2026

Firm evidence

Tier 1 — Market leaders Open firm profile →

Baker Botts

Baker Botts is placed in market leaders for Patent Litigation in Texas. Public mapping (banded): 25–49 attorneys, major local depth, ≈20 partners · <5 counsel · 20+ associates. Evidence gates — office (G1) PASS, local practice (G2) PASS, recent signal (G3) PASS. The placement carries no numeric score.

Strongest mapped work

Litigation & DisputesCorporate & M&AIntellectual Property

Public hiring signal

Hiring signal: FLAT — no public hiring change detected in the mapping window.

Limits of this assessment

  • —A tier is Sartori’s editorial opinion, not a fact about the firm or a client-satisfaction measure.
  • —Facts are mapped from public sources and shown as bands; they lag reality by weeks or months.
  • —No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input.

Sources for this entry

Methodology

How tiers are assigned

Deterministic public-footprint core (local depth, practice share, seniority mix, public hiring momentum), computed relative to this market's own distribution. Tier placement is derived from this public mapped data; a per-firm public-source ledger is compiled for firms in the annual research pass and applies to those firms' factual claims, not to tier membership. No third-party legal-directory bands are used as an input.

Market scope

5–9 firms earn a tier in Texas within this scope (banded).

Disclosures

Firm names used nominatively (factual). All counts shown as bands, never precise headcounts. No firm logos. Report an error via the site contact form.

Sources & change log

  1. 1 North America | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  2. 2 North America | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  3. 3 North America | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  4. 4 Houston | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  5. 5 Dallas | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  6. 6 Austin | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  7. 7 Baker Botts Represents CenterPoint Energy, Inc. in $1 Billion At-the-Market Program | News | May 2026 | Baker Bottsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  8. 8 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  9. 9 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  10. 10 Offices | Fish & Richardsonfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  11. 11 Fish & Richardson — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  12. 12 Fish & Richardson — Texas news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  13. 13 Offices: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  14. 14 Dallas: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  15. 15 Offices: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  16. 16 Austin: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  17. 17 Offices: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  18. 18 Houston: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  19. 19 Offices: McKool Smithfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  20. 20 Dallas: McKool Smithfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  21. 21 Austin: McKool Smithfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  22. 22 Houston: McKool Smithfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  23. 23 Marshall: McKool Smithfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  24. 24 Josh Budwin quoted in Law360's "Judge Albright Changed The Landscape Of Patent Litigation": McKool Smithfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  25. 25 Josh Newcomer quoted in Law360's "ITC Opens More Infringement Probes Into New IP Matters": McKool Smithfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  26. 26 Legendary Texas Trial Lawyer Sam Baxter Retires from McKool Smith: McKool Smithfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  27. 27 Offices Archive | Munck Wilson Mandalafirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  28. 28 Offices Archive | Munck Wilson Mandalafirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  29. 29 Offices Archive | Munck Wilson Mandalafirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  30. 30 Offices Archive | Munck Wilson Mandalafirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  31. 31 Offices Archive | Munck Wilson Mandalafirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  32. 32 Munck Wilson Mandala — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  33. 33 Munck Wilson Mandala — Texas news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  34. 34 Norton Rose Fulbright — Texas office pagesfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  35. 35 Houston | Offices | United States | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbrightfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  36. 36 Dallas | Offices | United States | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbrightfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  37. 37 Norton Rose Fulbright — Texas news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  38. 38 Locations - Winstead PCfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  39. 39 Dallas - Winstead PCfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  40. 40 Winstead — attorney bios & practice pagesfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  41. 41 Winstead — Texas news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  42. 42 Locations | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  43. 43 Dallas | Offices | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  44. 44 Locations | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  45. 45 Houston | Offices | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  46. 46 Locations | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  47. 47 Locations | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  48. 48 Dallas | Offices | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  49. 49 Houston | Offices | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  50. 50 Austin | Offices | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  51. 51 Ricardo Garcia-Moreno Featured in Invest: Houston | News | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  52. 52 Houston Office Highlights 2025 | Haynes Boonefirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
  53. 53 Offices - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  54. 54 Houston - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  55. 55 Offices - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  56. 56 Dallas - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  57. 57 Offices - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  58. 58 Austin - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G1 · 2026-07-21
  59. 59 Houston - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  60. 60 Dallas - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  61. 61 Austin - King & Spaldingfirm_website · G2 · 2026-07-21
  62. 62 King & Spalding — Texas news & announcementsfirm_website · G3 · 2026-07-21
22 Jul 2026 Scope-aware market-relative core assembled.
22 Jul 2026 62 verified source(s) ingested for the researched firms; tier placement comes from our own market data so unresearched visible firms do not block approval → APPROVED (auto).
Report an error in this ranking →

04 — Questions

About this ranking

Who are the best Patent Litigation law firms in Texas?

Who leads Patent Litigation in Texas? As of July 2026, Market leaders are Baker Botts, Fish & Richardson. Sartori does not name a single number-one firm; the gap inside Tier 1 is treated as unmeasurable, and the wider board of 9 firms uses worded tiers only.

Is Baker Botts the best Patent Litigation law firm in Texas?

Baker Botts sits in Tier 1 — Market leaders — of Sartori's Texas Patent Litigation board as of July 2026, alongside Fish & Richardson. Sartori does not name a single #1: the gap between Tier 1 firms is genuinely unmeasurable, and a numeric score would be false precision.

Which firms have the biggest Patent Litigation benches in Texas?

By mapped Texas bench, the largest firms on this board are Baker Botts, Fish & Richardson, McKool Smith, Norton Rose Fulbright, Haynes and Boone (25–49 mapped lawyers each). All counts are bands, never precise headcounts.

Which Patent Litigation teams are hiring in Texas?

As of July 2026, no firm on this board shows a public hiring signal in the mapping window. Live Texas mandates are listed on Sartori's jobs board.

What is a Tier 1 law firm?

In Sartori's rankings, Tier 1 — Market leaders — is an editorial judgement expressed in words, never a score: the firms whose Texas bench depth, seniority mix and market standing set the reference point for the market. As of July 2026 that is Baker Botts, Fish & Richardson. Within the tier no firm outranks another.

Which are the best law firms in Texas overall?

Sartori's overall Texas board groups 25 firms into editorial tiers; as of July 2026 its Tier 1 is Baker Botts, Haynes and Boone, Jackson Walker, Kirkland & Ellis, Norton Rose Fulbright, Vinson & Elkins. See /firms/in/texas/.

See the ranking →

This ranking is compiled independently by Sartori from public sources. Tiers are Sartori’s editorial opinion, expressed without numeric scores; firms are named for identification only, no logos are reproduced, and no firm has paid for or approved its placement. No third-party legal-directory band is used as an input. Nothing here is legal advice or a recommendation to instruct counsel.