Practices · November 2026
New York Capital Markets Hiring Tilts to IPO and Reporting Lawyers
New York takes a far larger share of public company reporting and IPO lawyer moves than of capital markets moves overall, with indexes of 227 and 181 against 169. Those hires also stay local: 7.5% changed city, against 23.8% across the practice.
The short version
- New York's index on public company reporting moves is 227, against 169 on capital markets as a whole.
- On equity offerings and IPOs, New York's index is 181, also above its index on the practice.
- Lawyers focused on equity offerings and IPOs made 43.3% of New York capital markets moves over 3 years.
- Only 7.5% of New York capital markets moves involved a change of city, against 23.8% across the practice.
- 152 capital markets lawyers joined New York firms laterally in the 12 months to October 2026.
The analysis
Sartori & Partners data show that New York capital markets lawyers lateral hiring is, above all, an equity and public-company market. New York holds 14.8% of all lateral moves in the market, but 25.0% of capital markets moves, 26.8% of moves by equity offerings and IPO lawyers and 33.6% of moves by public company reporting lawyers. Set against the market's share as an index, the city scores 169 on the practice, 181 on equity offerings and IPOs and 227 on public company reporting. The gap between the practice and its two equity specialties is what matters for a firm building a New York bench: the work that defines the city is issuer-side equity and disclosure, and the lawyers who do it cluster there more heavily than capital markets lawyers in general.
Public company reporting is where New York over-indexes most
- 227
- New York index, public company reporting moves
- 181
- New York index, equity offerings and IPO moves
- 169
- New York index, all capital markets moves
An index of a hundred would mean New York takes the same share of these moves as it takes of the whole lateral market. On public company reporting the city's index is 227, the highest of the three figures. Put plainly, New York's share of reporting moves is 1.3 times its share of capital markets moves. Equity offerings and IPOs sit between the two, at an index of 181.
The reporting gap is not a one-year effect. Over 3 years New York took 31.5% of public company reporting moves, against 23.2% of capital markets moves. The equity offerings gap is narrower on that longer view, with New York at 24.5%, so the equity tilt is sharper in the latest 12 months than across the full three-year span. London, the practice's second city, shows no such tilt: its index on equity offerings and IPOs is 102, below its index of 119 on the practice. For a firm, a New York reporting or IPO search draws on the deepest pool in the market and also the most contested one, because the rival firms hiring the same profile sit in the same few blocks of Manhattan.
Equity offerings are the largest specialty among New York hires
In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, 43.3% of New York capital markets moves over 3 years were made by lawyers focused on equity offerings and IPOs, and 29.8% by lawyers focused on public company reporting. Debt capital markets and high yield follows at 19.8%, and SPACs at 14.2%. Because one lawyer can carry more than one specialty, these shares are not a split of the 379 moves; they show how often each profile turns up in the city's hiring.
Counted in moves, the equity profile outnumbers the debt profile by 2.2 times: 164 equity offerings and IPO moves against 75 for debt capital markets and high yield. The consequence runs both ways. A firm hiring for equity work in New York has candidates to choose from, while a firm that wants a high-yield or investment-grade debt specialist there faces a thinner bench and should expect a longer search, or should look at lawyers whose debt work sits inside a finance practice rather than a capital markets one.
Reporting moves skew junior, IPO moves skew senior
The two specialties do not hire at the same level. Across the practice, partners made up 36.6% of equity offerings and IPO moves in the last 12 months, but only 25.2% of public company reporting moves, where associates were 61.1%. New York capital markets as a whole sits between the two, with partners at 29.6% of its moves against 31.5% across the practice.
Read together with the city's index, this means New York's reporting demand is mostly a demand for mid-level associates and counsel who keep annual and quarterly disclosure running for listed issuers, while its IPO demand reaches further into the partnership. The associate pool has a second buyer: across the practice, 14 lawyers left a firm for a company per hundred lateral moves over the last 6 months, and reporting lawyers are the profile listed companies recruit in-house. A firm should price a reporting associate search against that alternative, and plan an IPO partner search on a longer clock.
New York capital markets hires rarely change city
- 7.5%
- changed city, New York capital markets moves
- 23.8%
- changed city, capital markets moves in every city
- 10.9%
- changed city, all lateral moves into New York
Only 7.5% of New York capital markets moves involved a change of city, against 23.8% across the practice. That is lower even than the 10.9% recorded for all lateral moves into New York, a city whose market is already largely self-contained. The specialties that over-index in New York are mobile elsewhere: 24.5% of public company reporting moves and 22.7% of equity offerings and IPO moves changed city across the practice.
The longer view agrees. Over 3 years, 10.2% of New York capital markets moves changed city, against 23.0% for the practice, and 74.7% of the city's capital markets hires had left a New York office. The candidate pool for a New York capital markets role is, in practice, the bench at other New York firms. Relocation budgets and out-of-town searches add little here; a firm that wants to grow has to persuade lawyers at a competitor nearby, which raises both the value of retention and the price of each move.
Volume held flat, and the largest firms take most hires
Sartori & Partners counted 152 capital markets lateral moves into New York in the 12 months to October 2026, 25.0% of the practice's moves. On the settled 12-month windows the count held flat (+15.2%), from 132 to 152: on counts this small, a gain of that size is inside the noise. Across the practice, moves held flat (+6.7%) as well, from 571 to 609.
Firms with 1,000+ lawyers took 77.0% of New York capital markets hires in the last 12 months, against 69.1% across the practice and 62.6% of all lateral moves into New York. In all, 69 firms hired at least one capital markets lawyer in the city. A steady market with the largest platforms setting the terms leaves smaller firms one realistic route: a specific role, such as a reporting practice for mid-cap issuers, that a lawyer cannot find at a larger platform.
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Latham & Watkins | 11-20 |
| 2 | White & Case | 6-10 |
| 3 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | 6-10 |
| 4 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 6-10 |
| 5 | Loeb & Loeb | 3-5 |
| 6 | Proskauer Rose | 3-5 |
| 7 | Cooley | 3-5 |
| 8 | Milbank | 3-5 |
| 9 | Sidley Austin | 3-5 |
| 10 | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader | 3-5 |
What this means for firms hiring capital markets lawyers in New York
First, define the search by specialty, not by practice. New York's index of 227 on public company reporting and 181 on equity offerings and IPOs, against 169 on the practice, says the city's supply and its competition are both concentrated in equity and disclosure work. A brief that asks for a generic capital markets lawyer will surface that profile first, whether or not it is the one the firm needs.
Second, recruit locally and expect to pay for it. With 7.5% of moves involving a change of city, the people a firm can hire are already at New York firms, and each hire is a direct contest with a nearby competitor. Third, match the level to the specialty: reporting searches are mostly associate and counsel searches, IPO searches lean toward partners. Fourth, treat debt capital markets as the scarce profile in this city. Finally, weigh the internal route: New York capital markets lawyers were promoted to partner 29 times from June 2025 to May 2026, after a median of 10.0 years of practice, and a firm with a strong reporting associate class can grow part of its bench rather than buy it.
Questions readers ask
Which specialties drive New York capital markets lawyers lateral hiring?
Equity offerings and IPOs, and public company reporting: New York's index is 181 and 227 on them, against 169 on capital markets overall. Debt capital markets is a smaller share of the city's hiring.
How many capital markets lawyers moved firms in New York in the last 12 months?
Sartori & Partners recorded 152 capital markets lateral moves into New York in the 12 months to October 2026. That is 25.0% of the practice's moves across every city, and year-on-year volume was flat on the settled windows.
Do capital markets lawyers relocate to New York from other cities?
Rarely: only 7.5% of New York capital markets moves involved a change of city, against 23.8% across the practice. Most hires come from other New York firms.
Are public company reporting lateral hires mostly partners?
No. Across the practice, partners were 25.2% of public company reporting moves in the last 12 months, against 36.6% for equity offerings and IPOs. Associates make up most reporting hires.
Where this comes from
The monitor behind this report
Related reports
Hiring in this market
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].
For law firm leaders
Planning a partner hire in this market?
We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.