Practices · November 2026
Los Angeles Employment Hiring Is a Wage and Hour Market
Los Angeles takes 23.0% of wage and hour lateral moves, an index of 455 against 218 for employment overall, and wage and hour is a focus for 63.2% of the city's employment laterals against 47.7% in San Francisco.
The short version
- Los Angeles took 23.0% of all wage and hour lateral moves over 12 months, an index of 455 against the market.
- Employment and labor as a whole indexes at 218 in Los Angeles, against 455 for the wage and hour speciality.
- Wage and hour is a focus for 63.2% of Los Angeles employment laterals over 3 years, against 47.7% in San Francisco.
- 16.3% of Los Angeles employment laterals stepped up a title, against 13.5% for the practice as a whole.
- Los Angeles employment hiring held flat (+7.5%) over the settled 12-month windows, while lateral hiring in the city rose 21.0%.
The analysis
Sartori & Partners data show that Los Angeles wage and hour lawyers set the terms of employment hiring in the city. Los Angeles took 23.0% of all wage and hour lateral moves in the 12 months to October 2026, an index of 455 against the market. Employment and labor as a whole indexes at 218 in the same city, high but well short of the speciality. Inside the Los Angeles employment group the pattern repeats: over 3 years, wage and hour was a focus for 63.2% of the employment lawyers who joined Los Angeles firms, against 47.7% in San Francisco. For a firm building or defending an employment bench in Los Angeles, both the candidate pool and the rival bidders are shaped by wage and hour work far more than the practice's overall mix would suggest.
- 23.0%
- of wage and hour lateral moves joined Los Angeles firms, 12 months
- 455
- wage and hour index in Los Angeles against the market
- 218
- employment and labor index in Los Angeles against the market
- 63.2%
- of Los Angeles employment laterals focus on wage and hour, 3 years
Wage and hour leans on Los Angeles harder than employment does
Set against the practice, the speciality is the more concentrated of the two. Los Angeles holds 11.0% of employment and labor lateral moves across the market and 23.0% of wage and hour moves, while the city accounts for 5.1% of lateral moves in all practices. The wage and hour index of 455 is 2.1 times the employment index of 218. Set against the city, employment is already a large part of local hiring: it was involved in 23.3% of Los Angeles lateral moves over 12 months, second in volume only to litigation.
| City | Wage and hour moves | Share of wage and hour moves | Index against the market |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | 98 | 23.0% | 455 |
| New York | 52 | 12.2% | 83 |
| San Francisco | 38 | 8.9% | 277 |
| San Diego | 26 | 6.1% | 682 |
| Chicago | 23 | 5.4% | 127 |
The concentration is a California pattern with Los Angeles at its center. San Francisco indexes at 277 for wage and hour and San Diego at 682, the highest index on the list but on only 26 moves. New York, second by volume, sits below the market at 83. The share is stable over time: Los Angeles held 23.2% of wage and hour moves over 3 years, against 23.0% in the last 12 months. California's wage statutes are a familiar source of class and representative claims, which is context rather than something these figures measure. The practical reading for a hiring partner: the largest flow of wage and hour movers anywhere runs through Los Angeles, and a search there competes with firms whose employment hiring already leans toward it.
Inside the Los Angeles bench, wage and hour runs well above San Francisco
In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, the focus areas of the employment lawyers who moved show the same tilt at the level of the city's employment group. Over 3 years, 63.2% of Los Angeles employment laterals listed wage and hour, against 47.7% in San Francisco, a gap of 15.5 points. Wage and hour sits level with discrimination and harassment in Los Angeles, at 63.0%, and both run far ahead of San Francisco, where discrimination and harassment is at 48.2%. Employment litigation, the broadest label, is high in both cities: 81.0% and 72.5%. Each lawyer can list more than one focus, so these shares overlap and never add up to a whole.
| Speciality | Los Angeles employment | San Francisco employment |
|---|---|---|
| Employment Litigation | 81.0% | 72.5% |
| Wage & Hour | 63.2% | 47.7% |
| Discrimination & Harassment | 63.0% | 48.2% |
| Employment Advisory | 42.5% | 36.3% |
Against the practice as a whole the tilt is sharper. Wage and hour moves equal 28.2% of employment and labor moves across the market over 12 months, a different window from the Los Angeles 3-year figure of 63.2%, so read the two as sizes rather than as a precise gap. Advisory work tells the other side of the story: employment advisory is a focus for 42.5% of Los Angeles employment laterals, the lowest of the four large labels. A Los Angeles group built mainly on counseling recruits from a market that is built mainly on claims.
The employment group held steady while Los Angeles hiring rose
Over the settled 12-month windows, employment hiring in Los Angeles held flat (+7.5%), from 160 moves to 172. The practice across the market rose 6.9%, from 1,438 to 1,537, and lateral hiring in the city as a whole rose 21.0%, from 590 to 714. Wage and hour hiring across the market held flat (-0.2%), at 445 and 444 moves.
A steady group inside a busier city takes a smaller slice of it. Employment was involved in 25.9% of Los Angeles lateral moves over 3 years and in 23.3% over the last 12 months. For a firm planning a Los Angeles employment hire, the flow of candidates has held level rather than grown, so a search cannot count on a rising number of movers to fill a seat faster.
More Los Angeles employment laterals step up a title
Step-up moves are a larger part of this market than of its references. In the Sartori & Partners figures, 16.3% of Los Angeles employment laterals joined at a higher title than the one they left, against 13.5% for the practice as a whole and 13.8% for Los Angeles moves in every practice. Wage and hour movers across the market stepped up in 14.3% of cases. Over 3 years the Los Angeles employment figure was 15.4%, so the pattern is not a one-year spike.
The level mix sits between the practice and the city. Partners made up 24.1% of Los Angeles employment moves over 12 months, against 22.4% in the practice and 27.9% across Los Angeles; counsel were 16.9%, above both the practice at 15.2% and the city at 13.9%. A firm defending its senior associates and counsel in this market should expect rivals to compete with title as well as pay, and should decide early whether it can match a partnership offer.
The firms hiring employment lawyers in Los Angeles are the wage and hour hirers
Hiring in the Los Angeles employment group is concentrated. The ten most active firms made 42.1% of its individual hires over 12 months, against 30.0% for the practice across the market and 16.7% for all Los Angeles hiring; 79 firms hired at least one employment lawyer in the city. The wage and hour speciality shows a similar concentration, 42.2% across the market.
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson Lewis | 11-20 |
| 2 | O'Hagan Meyer | 11-20 |
| 3 | Seyfarth Shaw | 6-10 |
| 4 | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 6-10 |
| 5 | Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton | 6-10 |
| 6 | Ogletree Deakins | 6-10 |
| 7 | Fisher & Phillips | 3-5 |
| 8 | Kaufman Dolowich | 3-5 |
| 9 | Davis Wright Tremaine | 3-5 |
| 10 | Littler Mendelson | 3-5 |
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Littler Mendelson | 21-40 |
| 2 | Ogletree Deakins | 21-40 |
| 3 | Fisher & Phillips | 21-40 |
| 4 | Jackson Lewis | 21-40 |
| 5 | Greenberg Traurig | 11-20 |
| 6 | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 11-20 |
| 7 | Kaufman Dolowich | 11-20 |
| 8 | Seyfarth Shaw | 11-20 |
| 9 | O'Hagan Meyer | 6-10 |
| 10 | Davis Wright Tremaine | 6-10 |
Nine of the ten firms on the Los Angeles employment list also appear among the ten most active wage and hour hirers across the market. Jackson Lewis ranks first in the Los Angeles employment list with 11-20 hires, and the firm in first place among all Los Angeles hirers is Jackson Lewis. By firm size the group matches its references: firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 46.6% of its hires, against 46.9% for the practice and 47.0% across Los Angeles. For a firm outside the list, a Los Angeles employment search competes first with the firms that recruit wage and hour lawyers everywhere, and an offer has to be measured against theirs.
What this means for law firms hiring employment lawyers in Los Angeles
Hire for wage and hour first. The speciality is a focus for 63.2% of the city's employment laterals, so a candidate without it sits outside the main current of the market, and an employment group without it is out of step with the city. Recruit locally: only 17.9% of Los Angeles employment laterals changed city, against 20.6% for the practice as a whole, so relocation is a thin channel. Plan for a steady flow, not a growing one: 172 moves in the latest settled 12 months against 160 the year before. Price the title as well as the pay, since step-ups run at 16.3%. And do not staff a Los Angeles group on a San Francisco profile: wage and hour is a focus for 47.7% of employment laterals there, a different bench for a different docket.
Questions readers ask
How large is the market for Los Angeles wage and hour lawyers?
Los Angeles took 23.0% of all wage and hour lateral moves in the 12 months to October 2026, 98 moves, the largest share of any city. Its index against the market is 455.
Is wage and hour more concentrated in Los Angeles than employment law overall?
Yes: the wage and hour index in Los Angeles is 455, against 218 for employment and labor, where one hundred means the market's share. The speciality is 2.1 times as concentrated in the city.
How does Los Angeles employment hiring compare with San Francisco?
Wage and hour is a focus for 63.2% of Los Angeles employment laterals over 3 years, against 47.7% in San Francisco. The Los Angeles group is also larger: 166 moves over 12 months against 77.
Is employment hiring in Los Angeles growing?
Not clearly: Los Angeles employment hiring held flat (+7.5%), from 160 to 172 moves, while lateral hiring in the city overall rose 21.0%.
Which firms hire the most employment lawyers in Los Angeles?
Jackson Lewis ranked first over 12 months, followed by O'Hagan Meyer and Seyfarth Shaw. The ten most active firms made 42.1% of the group's individual hires.
Where this comes from
The monitor behind this report
Related reports
Hiring in this market
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].
For law firm leaders
Planning a partner hire in this market?
We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.