Practices · November 2026

International Trade Lateral Hiring 2026: 49.1% Land in Washington

International trade lateral hiring centers on Washington: 49.1% of moves land there, an index of 876 and the largest single-city share of any practice. Partners are 40.6% of moves, against 27.7% market-wide.

Hire legal talent Partner recruiting
01 Key facts

The short version

  • Washington took 49.1% of international trade lateral moves in 12 months, an index of 876 against the market.
  • Partners made up 40.6% of international trade lateral moves, against 27.7% across all practices.
  • International trade partner hiring held flat (+28.6%) on settled windows, a gap inside the noise of small counts.
  • 29.2% of international trade lateral moves also carried a white collar, investigations and criminal label.
  • Over three years Washington took 44.6% of international trade arrivals and London, the only other listed city, 10.3%.
02 November 2026 edition

The analysis

International trade lawyer lateral hiring comes down to one city. Sartori & Partners data show 106 lateral moves in international trade and national security over the latest 12 months, and 52 of them, 49.1%, joined an office in Washington. For a firm planning a trade hire, that one figure sets the terms of the search: where the candidates sit, who competes for them, and how hard a search outside the capital will be. The practice is small, 0.8% of all lateral moves, so every count here is modest and every share should be read next to its base.

49.1%
of trade moves joined in Washington
876
Washington index against the market
40.6%
partner share of trade moves

Washington holds a larger share of trade than any city holds of any other practice

The Washington share of 49.1% carries an index of 876 against the whole market, where the capital takes 5.6% of lateral moves. No other practice in the Sartori & Partners records sends as large a share of its moves to a single city. A few practices have a smaller city that indexes higher on a thin base, but none concentrates so much of its volume in one place.

The closest neighbors make the point. Public law and government, the other practice built around the capital, sends 26.0% of its moves there, an index of 464. White collar, investigations and criminal sends 19.7%, an index of 351. The trade share is 1.9 times the public law figure.

The supply side looks the same. 42.5% of trade laterals left a Washington office, against 5.0% of all laterals. Only 13.1% of trade lawyers changed city when they moved, below the market's 20.5%, so the Washington pool seldom leaves Washington.

A firm without a Washington trade bench is recruiting against the current. The lawyers it wants sit in the capital and tend to stay there, so the realistic plan is a Washington seat for the hire, not a move to an existing office elsewhere.

Three years of records add London as the one other trade hub

The 12-month city list names Washington alone, because no other city gathered enough trade arrivals to be counted. The longer record in the Sartori & Partners lateral database adds one more. Of 312 international trade moves over three years, Washington took 44.6% and London 10.3%.

City share over 36 months: international trade against all practices
CityInternational tradeAll practices
Washington, DC44.6%5.2%
London10.3%10.0%

London's trade share sits almost exactly at its weight in the whole market, 10.0%, so London hires trade lawyers at par: a real market, not a cluster. Washington's three-year share stands against a market share of 5.2%, which shows the pull is no one-year effect, and the latest 12 months sit above the three-year figure.

For a firm with a European trade practice, London is the one place outside the capital where a search can expect a local slate. Anywhere else, plan on a national search and a harder conversation about relocation from the first call.

Partners take a far larger share of trade moves than of the market

Partners were 40.6% of international trade lateral moves in the latest 12 months, against 27.7% across all practices. Associates were 48.1%, against 58.5% market-wide, and counsel 10.4%.

Level share: international trade against all practices, 12 months
LevelInternational tradeAll practices
partner40.6%27.7%
counsel10.4%12.7%
associate48.1%58.5%

Here trade parts company with public law, whose partner share is 34.1%, and lines up with white collar at 41.6%. Over three years the trade partner share was 34.3%, against 26.9% for the market, so the senior tilt is not new. A move with a higher title is not the driver: 13.2% of trade moves came with one, against 12.9% in the market.

A trade search is usually a partner search with a book of regulatory work behind it. Firms should plan it as one: the pool is senior, small and concentrated in one city, so the time to a signed offer runs longer than the headcount suggests.

Volume and partner hiring both held flat

On settled 12-month windows, trade recorded 119 moves against 112 the year before, so volume held flat (+6.2%). The market rose 9.0% over the same windows.

Partner moves look sharper on paper and are not. The settled count was 45 against 35, and partner hiring held flat (+28.6%): a gap of that size on counts in the thirties and forties sits inside the noise. Partner hiring across the market rose 8.4%.

International trade lateral moves by year

Calendar years; 2026 runs to October and is partial.

Flat volume in a small practice means the supply of movers barely changes from year to year. A firm cannot wait for the pool to grow; it has to win a larger part of the same small group of partners.

White collar is the practice trade hiring overlaps with most

29.2% of international trade lateral moves in 12 months also carried a white collar, investigations and criminal label. Seen from the other side, trade accounts for 6.5% of white collar moves, so the link weighs far more on trade than on white collar.

The overlap follows the work. Sanctions and export-control matters often turn into investigations, and firms hire lawyers who can carry both. A trade candidate is often a white collar candidate too, and a Washington investigations search will meet many of the same names.

For a firm, the overlap widens the pool in one direction. A white collar partner with sanctions or export-control experience can be the trade hire, so investigations benches, inside the firm and out, belong on the search map from the start.

Firms of 1,000+ lawyers take most trade hires

58 firms hired an international trade lateral in 12 months, and the top 10 hirers took 39.6% of those hires, against 12.9% for the market's top 10. Over three years the picture holds: 119 firms hired in trade, and the top 10 took 30.2%, against 12.2% market-wide. Among trade hires to firms of known size, firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 66.0%, against 53.6% in the market, and firms of 400-999 lawyers 20.4%.

Most active international trade hirers, 12 months
RankFirmBand
1Greenberg Traurig6-10
2Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati6-10
3Steptoe6-10
4Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman3-5
5Sidley Austin3-5
6Clyde & Co3-5
7King & Spalding3-5
8Morgan, Lewis & Bockius3-5
9Brown Rudnick3-5

The competition for a trade hire is a known set of firms, most of the volume going to firms of 1,000+ lawyers. A smaller firm competes here on platform and on the national security work around the role, since the candidate is choosing a bench as much as a seat.

What this means for firms

Build the trade search around Washington. With 49.1% of moves landing there and only 13.1% of trade laterals changing city, a hire for another office is the exception, and the plan should assume a Washington seat.

Budget for a partner-level search. Partners are 40.6% of trade moves against 27.7% market-wide, and partner hiring held flat (+28.6%), so the pool will not expand to meet new demand.

Use the white collar bench. With 29.2% of trade moves overlapping white collar, investigations partners with sanctions or export-control work are the widest adjacent pool, and the one a rival without an investigations group cannot reach as easily.

Outside the capital, start with London. Over three years it took 10.3% of trade arrivals, the only other city with enough moves to count, at about the market's own rate.

03 Questions

Questions readers ask

Where does international trade lawyer lateral hiring happen?

Mostly in Washington, which took 49.1% of international trade lateral moves in 12 months, an index of 876 against the market. Over three years London was the only other city with enough moves to count, at 10.3%.

How senior are international trade lateral hires?

Partners were 40.6% of international trade lateral moves in 12 months, against 27.7% across all practices. Associates were 48.1%, well below the market's 58.5%.

Is international trade lateral hiring growing?

No: on settled 12-month windows trade volume held flat (+6.2%), 119 moves against 112. Partner hiring held flat (+28.6%) on counts too small for the gap to be a real change, while the market rose 9.0%.

Which practice overlaps most with international trade hiring?

White collar, investigations and criminal: 29.2% of international trade lateral moves also carried that label in 12 months. Trade, in turn, is 6.5% of white collar moves.

04 Keep reading

Where this comes from

The monitor behind this report

Hiring in this market

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].

For law firm leaders

Planning a partner hire in this market?

We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.