Practices · November 2026

Minneapolis Litigation Hiring: Counsel Take 23.3% of Moves

Minneapolis litigation hires counsel at 1.6 times the practice rate: 23.3% of lateral moves against 14.4%. Volume rose 76.5% on the settled 12-month windows, while litigation across the practice rose 7.5%.

Hire legal talent Lateral partner recruiting: litigation
01 Key facts

The short version

  • Counsel were 23.3% of Minneapolis litigation lateral moves, against 14.4% across the litigation practice.
  • Among all Minneapolis lateral moves, counsel made up 16.0%, below the 23.3% seen in the city's litigation hiring.
  • Minneapolis litigation moves went from 34 to 60 year on year, a rise of 76.5%.
  • Over the same settled 12-month windows, litigation across the practice rose 7.5%.
  • 25.0% of Minneapolis litigation laterals joined at a higher title, against 13.4% across litigation.
02 November 2026 edition

The analysis

Sartori & Partners data show that counsel made up 23.3% of the lateral moves into Minneapolis litigation over the past 12 months, against 14.4% for litigation across the practice and 16.0% for Minneapolis hiring in all practices. For a firm recruiting Minneapolis litigation lawyers, that gap reshapes the search: the tier between senior associate and partner is where this market trades, and it is trading at a pace the wider practice does not match.

The base is modest. Firms in the city took 60 litigation laterals in the 12 months to October 2026, and the counsel count on its own sits below the level we print, so the share should be read as a size rather than a precise rank. The direction, though, holds on every comparison this report makes: against the practice, against the city, and against the city's own litigation record over 3 years.

23.3%
counsel share of Minneapolis litigation moves
+76.5%
year on year, Minneapolis litigation
25.0%
joined at a higher title

Counsel take 23.3% of Minneapolis litigation moves, against 14.4% across the practice

In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, the counsel share in Minneapolis litigation sits 8.9 points above litigation across the practice and 7.3 points above Minneapolis as a whole. Set against the practice, the city's litigators who move are counsel 1.6 times as often. Partners hold a similar weight in both places, 26.7% of Minneapolis litigation moves against 27.4% across the practice. The difference sits lower in the ladder: associates are 48.3% of the Minneapolis litigation moves and 57.7% of the practice's.

Level mix of lateral moves, 12 months: Minneapolis litigation against litigation across the practice
LevelMinneapolis litigationLitigation, all markets
partner26.7%27.4%
counsel23.3%14.4%
associate48.3%57.7%

The city figure is itself lifted by litigation, which carries 56.6% of all lateral moves into Minneapolis firms. For a hiring partner, the consequence is direct: a Minneapolis litigation search framed at the counsel level is aimed at the group that actually changes firms here, and a role with a defined path from counsel to partnership speaks to the people most likely to listen.

The counsel weight is recent: the 3-year share was 16.4%

Minneapolis litigation lateral moves by level, 12 months (share)

Shares of the 12 months to October 2026; the counsel count is too small to print on its own, so its share is a rough size.

Over the 3-year window, which includes the latest 12 months, counsel accounted for 16.4% of Minneapolis litigation moves. The most recent year therefore runs 6.9 points above its own longer record. Across the practice the same comparison moves far less, from 13.4% over 3 years to 14.4% in the latest 12 months. Minneapolis in all practices shifted from 12.4% to 16.0%.

Associates went the other way in Minneapolis litigation: 57.9% of moves over 3 years, 48.3% in the latest year. Read together, the two series say the city's litigation groups have been filling the middle of the ladder by hiring people who already hold a counsel title, or by offering that title to senior associates. Firms that budget for a counsel hire this year are buying into a tier that has grown recently; the window is open now, and a market this small can close it within a year.

Minneapolis litigation hiring rose 76.5% while the practice rose 7.5%

Sartori & Partners counts 60 lateral moves into Minneapolis litigation in the 12 months to September 2026, against 34 in the 12 months before, so Minneapolis litigation hiring rose 76.5%. Litigation across the practice rose 7.5% on the same windows, from 5,281 to 5,679 moves. Minneapolis hiring in all practices rose 40.8%, from 76 to 107.

Minneapolis litigation lateral moves by year

2026 runs to October and is a partial year.

The yearly series puts the jump in proportion. Minneapolis litigation moves stood at 32 in 2023 and 40 in 2025; 2026 has already reached 54 with November and December still to come. Litigation's share of Minneapolis moves sits at an index of 142 against the practice's share of the whole market, so the city leans toward disputes work more than most. A pool that grows this quickly on a small base also empties quickly: a firm that waits for a second year of confirmation will be bidding for candidates who have already accepted elsewhere.

Step-ups reach 25.0% of moves, against 13.4% across litigation

Sartori & Partners data show 25.0% of Minneapolis litigation laterals joined at a higher title than the one they left, against 13.4% across the practice and 20.8% for Minneapolis in all practices. Over 3 years the Minneapolis litigation step-up share was 17.1%, so the latest year is also above the city's own litigation record. The two findings are linked by definition: an associate who joins as counsel counts as a step-up, and so does a counsel who joins as partner.

The price for the hiring firm is paid in title as much as in pay. A candidate who has watched peers move up a rung will expect the offer to do the same, so a lateral at an unchanged title is a harder sell in Minneapolis litigation than elsewhere in the practice. Firms should decide before the first interview whether a counsel title, or a dated route to partnership, is on the table.

A local bench, spread across firm sizes like the practice

Firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 41.4% of Minneapolis litigation moves, against 43.3% across the practice, and the smaller size classes line up closely as well. The buyers, in other words, look like litigation buyers anywhere; what differs is the level they hire at. In the 12 months, 33 firms made at least one litigation hire in the city.

Lateral moves by size of the hiring firm, 12 months
Firm sizeMinneapolis litigationLitigation, all markets
1,000+ lawyers41.4%43.3%
400-999 lawyers25.9%25.7%
150-399 lawyers20.7%18.2%
under 150 lawyers12.1%12.8%

The candidates are mostly already in town. Over 3 years, 62.1% of Minneapolis litigation moves came from lawyers leaving a Minneapolis firm, and only 15.6% of the latest year's moves involved a change of city, against 19.6% across the practice. Team moves made up 10.0% of Minneapolis litigation moves, above the practice's 2.0% but below the 17.9% for Minneapolis in all practices. A firm building a Minneapolis litigation bench should plan to recruit from the city's own firms, mostly one lawyer at a time, and should not count on relocating litigators from other markets to fill a counsel seat.

What this means for firms hiring litigators in Minneapolis

The counsel tier is the opening. With counsel at 23.3% of Minneapolis litigation moves, against 14.4% across the practice, a search for a senior non-partner litigator here meets more movement than the practice average would predict. Firms that only hire associates or partners leave that tier to competitors.

Time matters. Volume rose 76.5% between the two settled windows, from 34 to 60 moves, and the candidates in motion now are the ones a firm can reach this year. Sartori & Partners would treat a Minneapolis litigation counsel search as a current opportunity, not a plan for next year.

The offer has to carry a rung. With 25.0% of moves made at a higher title, a counsel role framed as a step toward partnership, with the criteria written down, will compete; a sideways move at the same title will mostly not. Recruit locally, expect single hires rather than teams, and judge results on a 12-month count rather than on one quarter, because the numbers here are small enough to swing.

03 Questions

Questions readers ask

How many Minneapolis litigation lawyers change firms in a year?

Sartori & Partners recorded 60 lateral moves into Minneapolis litigation in the 12 months to October 2026. On the settled windows, which end a month earlier, the count rose from 34 to 60.

What share of Minneapolis litigation laterals are counsel?

Counsel made up 23.3% of Minneapolis litigation lateral moves over 12 months, against 14.4% across the practice and 16.0% for Minneapolis overall. The counsel count itself is small, so the share is a size, not a ranking.

Is Minneapolis litigation hiring growing faster than the practice?

Yes: Minneapolis litigation moves rose 76.5% year on year, while litigation across the practice rose 7.5%. The Minneapolis figure rests on a small base, so it can swing more from one year to the next.

How often do Minneapolis litigators join at a higher title?

25.0% of Minneapolis litigation laterals joined at a higher title, against 13.4% across litigation and 20.8% for the city in all practices.

04 Keep reading

Where this comes from

The monitor behind this report

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].

For law firm leaders

Planning a partner hire in this market?

We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.