Practices · November 2026

New York Product Liability Laterals Rarely Step Up a Title

A smaller share of New York product liability laterals join at a higher title than across the practice. Over the settled 12 months the cell fell 27.3%, while the practice held flat (+2.3%) and New York rose 11.9%.

Hire legal talent Partner recruiting
01 Key facts

The short version

  • Only 10.6% of New York product liability laterals joined at a higher title over 12 months, against 15.7% across the practice.
  • New York lateral moves in all practices show a step-up share of 11.6%, close to the product liability figure in the city.
  • Over 3 years the New York product liability step-up share was 12.5%, against 15.0% across the practice.
  • New York product liability lateral hiring fell 27.3%, from 139 to 101 moves, while New York as a whole rose 11.9%.
  • Counsel made up 19.2% of New York product liability lateral moves, against 12.6% in the city across practices.
02 November 2026 edition

The analysis

New York product liability lateral hiring offers few promotions on the way in. Sartori & Partners data show that 10.6% of the product liability and torts lawyers who joined a New York firm over the last 12 months arrived at a higher title than the one they left. Across the practice the figure is 15.7%. In New York, across all practices, it is 11.6%. The cell sits with its city, not with its practice, and the city itself is a place where laterals mostly move at the title they already hold. For a firm hiring product liability lawyers in New York, the title step is a weak bargaining chip: most candidates expect to keep the rank they have and to be paid for it.

10.6%
New York product liability laterals who joined at a higher title
15.7%
product liability laterals across the practice
11.6%
New York laterals in all practices
-27.3%
New York product liability moves, year on year

Title gains trail the practice by a wide margin and the city by a little

A title gain here means an associate who joins as counsel or partner, or a counsel who joins as partner. Measured that way, New York product liability runs 5.1 points below the practice. The gap to New York in all practices is only 1.0 points, so the low figure is largely a New York trait that product liability shares. Across the practice as a whole, product liability groups use the lateral move as a promotion more often than New York firms do. The consequence for a New York hiring partner is practical. A candidate who wants the next title is more likely to find it outside the city, and a New York offer that rests on a title will often lose to an offer that rests on compensation or on the quality of the docket.

Over 3 years the cell sat above the city, still below the practice

The longer window softens one part of the picture and confirms the other. In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, 12.5% of New York product liability laterals stepped up over 3 years, against 15.0% across the practice and 11.5% in New York in all practices. Over that span the cell was slightly ahead of its city. The latest 12 months sit 1.9 points under the cell's own 3-year rate, while the practice moved the other way, from 15.0% to 15.7%.

Two readings follow. The distance to the practice is lasting: it shows in both windows. The narrow gap to the city is recent and small enough that a handful of moves could close it. A firm should plan around the lasting part: in New York product liability, title promotion on the move is the exception, and the exception has become rarer over the last year.

The cell fell while the practice held flat and New York rose

Volume tells a different story from the city around it. New York product liability lateral moves fell 27.3% between the two settled 12-month windows, from 139 to 101. Product liability across the practice held flat (+2.3%), at 959 moves against 981. New York in all practices rose 11.9%, from 1,862 to 2,084. Both windows end in September 2026, because the newest month reads low while start dates are confirmed.

New York product liability and torts lateral moves by year

2026 runs to October and is a partial year.

The calendar years show where the drop came from. The cell grew from 108 moves in 2023 to 136 in 2025, and 2026 counts 92 through October. New York's place in the practice has slipped with it: the city held 12.1% of product liability moves over 3 years and 10.8% in the latest 12 months. Fewer movers and fewer step-ups point the same way: the New York candidates still in motion are mostly moving sideways, and a search here will meet a thinner pool than a year ago.

A level mix with more counsel and fewer partners

The level mix helps explain why step-ups are scarce. Partners made up 22.1% of New York product liability moves over 12 months, against 27.3% across the practice and 28.3% in the city in all practices. Counsel made up 19.2%, against 16.8% and 12.6%. A step-up to partner can only show among partner hires, so a cell that hires fewer partners has fewer chances to record one. Over 3 years partners were 27.0% of the cell's moves, above the latest 12-month share.

Level mix, 12 months: New York product liability against the practice
LevelNew York product liabilityProduct liability, all cities
partner22.1%27.3%
counsel19.2%16.8%
associate58.7%55.8%

The counsel tier is the deep one. New York product liability firms take on counsel at a higher rate than the city or the practice, and with step-ups this rare, many of those hires arrive as counsel already. For a firm short of senior capacity on mass tort or premises dockets, that tier is the place to recruit: the candidates exist, and the move does not depend on a promise of partnership.

In New York, the partner title is won at home

If the step up rarely comes with a lateral move, it comes through promotion. New York product liability groups promoted 24 lawyers to partner from June 2025 to May 2026, and 91 over 5 years. The median time to partner over 5 years was 11.0 years, and 65.2% of those promoted made it within 12 years of starting practice. Sartori & Partners figures therefore describe a market where senior associates and counsel wait for the title inside their firm instead of crossing the street for it. A firm that wants a partner-ready lawyer should expect to pay for a candidate who is already close to promotion at home, and to explain why the move beats waiting.

What this means for law firms hiring product liability lawyers in New York

Price the move, not the title. With 10.6% of New York product liability laterals stepping up, against 15.7% across the practice, a title offer is unusual here and competing offers will rest on pay and work. Expect a smaller pool: the cell fell 27.3% while New York in all practices rose 11.9%, so the shortage belongs to the practice, not to the city. Recruit counsel as counsel, where the cell runs at 19.2% of moves. And for partner-level needs, look at senior associates close to promotion at their own firm, or at product liability groups outside New York, where the move up is more common.

03 Questions

Questions readers ask

How is New York product liability lateral hiring changing?

New York product liability lateral hiring fell 27.3% over the settled 12-month windows, from 139 to 101 moves. Across the practice hiring held flat (+2.3%), and New York in all practices rose 11.9%.

Do product liability lawyers in New York get a higher title when they move?

Rarely: 10.6% joined at a higher title over 12 months, against 15.7% across the practice. New York in all practices sits at 11.6%.

Is the low step-up rate new?

Partly: over 3 years the cell's step-up share was 12.5%, still below the practice's 15.0%. The gap to the practice is lasting; the latest 12 months are lower still.

Which level moves most in New York product liability?

Associates were 58.7% of New York product liability moves over 12 months, counsel 19.2% and partners 22.1%.

04 Keep reading

Where this comes from

The monitor behind this report

Hiring in this market

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].

For law firm leaders

Planning a partner hire in this market?

We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.