Specialities · November 2026
Commercial Real Estate Transaction Lawyers in 2026: Who Buys the Work
Real estate companies commission most commercial real estate transaction work, but asset managers and funds account for 16.3% of its deals. Lateral hiring held flat (+4.2%) while the practice's dated deals rose 9.6%.
The short version
- Asset managers and funds commissioned 16.3% of commercial real estate transaction deals over 3 years.
- Real estate companies were 64.5% of those deals, against 71.9% in real estate finance.
- Property deals proper were 89.5% of the speciality's deals over 3 years, against 77.4% across the practice in 12 months.
- Commercial real estate transactions hold 41.3% of real estate lateral moves, against 34.1% for real estate finance.
- Transaction partner hiring held flat (-6.6%) while the real estate practice's dated deals rose 9.6%.
The analysis
Commercial real estate transaction lawyers work for two kinds of buyer, and a hiring plan built around only one of them misreads the bench. Sartori & Partners data show that real estate companies commissioned 64.5% of the speciality's dated deals over 3 years, while asset managers and funds commissioned 16.3%. The second figure is the one a firm should plan around: a real slice of acquisitions, disposals and portfolio sales is instructed by investors that buy across many assets and give repeat mandates to the counsel they trust.
The work is also steady on record. The speciality carried 606 dated deals in the last 12 months and 1,622 over 3 years, matters announced by firms and public registers rather than a measure of fees. On the hiring side it accounts for 41.3% of all real estate lateral moves, against 34.1% for real estate finance, and 628 lawyers joined a new firm to do this work in the last 12 months.
Funds and asset managers sit beside property owners as clients
Over 3 years, 1,046 of the speciality's 1,622 dated deals were done for real estate companies and 265 for asset managers and funds. Financial sponsors add 5.8% and hospitality and leisure owners 3.3%. One deal can carry more than one client industry, so these shares overlap and are not a split of the work.
Set against real estate finance, the client base is less concentrated. Real estate companies were 71.9% of real estate finance deals over the same 3 years, 7.4 points more than in transaction work. Across the whole real estate practice in the last 12 months, real estate companies were 59.0% of dated deals and asset managers and funds 11.1%. The windows differ, so read that as context rather than a trend.
For a firm building a transaction group, the useful question for every candidate is how much of the book comes from fund managers. In this speciality that client group commissions 16.3% of the deals, and a partner without those relationships covers only part of the demand.
Transaction deals are more purely property work than the practice's
Sartori & Partners figures on dated deals show the shape of the work more than its size. Property deals proper were 89.5% of the speciality's deals over 3 years, against 77.4% of the whole real estate practice's dated deals in the last 12 months. The windows differ, so read the gap as a difference in focus, not a trend.
Company acquisitions confirm it. They were only 3.2% of the speciality's deals, against 4.3% across the practice, and the practice's wider mix also carries disputes at 6.0% and lending at 2.3%. Transaction lawyers stay close to the asset.
Hiring points the same way: the speciality is the largest hiring stream in the practice by share of moves. A firm adding transaction lawyers is adding to the most asset-focused part of a real estate practice, not to a niche that depends on a few clients.
Deal volume rose while transaction hiring held flat
- +9.6%
- real estate practice dated deals, year on year
- +4.2%
- transaction lateral moves, year on year, flat
- -6.6%
- transaction partner moves, year on year, flat
The real estate practice's dated deals rose 9.6% year on year, from 1,276 to 1,398 in the settled 12-month windows. Lateral hiring in commercial real estate transactions did not keep pace. It held flat (+4.2%), at 644 moves against 618. Partner hiring held flat (-6.6%), with 197 partner moves against 211.
The wider market moved differently. Lateral hiring across the whole real estate practice rose 7.9%, and market-wide hiring rose 9.0%. Transaction work is the one part of this picture where hiring stayed flat at 644 settled moves while deals grew.
More deals with the same hiring pace means existing teams are absorbing the extra volume. For a firm that wants a larger share of this work, the case for hiring now is plain: rivals have held their transaction hiring flat, so a lateral hire lands where demand has moved ahead of supply.
Partners are a larger share of transaction moves than of the market
Partners made up 31.5% of commercial real estate transaction moves in 12 months, against 28.9% across the real estate practice and 27.7% across all practices. Associates were 52.5% of moves, below the market's 58.5%.
| Level | Transactions | All practices |
|---|---|---|
| partner | 31.5% | 27.7% |
| counsel | 15.9% | 12.7% |
| associate | 52.5% | 58.5% |
Hiring is also more concentrated than in the market. In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, 245 firms hired at least one transaction lawyer in 12 months, and the top 10 hirers took 20.6% of moves, against 12.9% for the top 10 across all practices. Firms also promoted 164 transaction lawyers to partner in the 12 months to May 2026, after a median of 10.0 years in practice.
A firm competing for transaction partners meets the same repeat buyers in most searches. Expect counteroffers, budget for a longer process than an associate search, and keep the internal track in view: promotion supplies a steady flow of new partners each year.
Miami, Dallas and Chicago over-index for transaction hiring
New York takes the most transaction moves, 14.8%, which sits exactly at the market's own share for the city: an index of 100. The over-index lies elsewhere. Miami reads 149, Dallas 143 and Chicago 132, while London sits well under the market at 55.
| City | Moves | Share | Index against market |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | 93 | 14.8% | 100 |
| Chicago | 35 | 5.6% | 132 |
| Los Angeles | 33 | 5.3% | 105 |
| London | 32 | 5.1% | 55 |
| Dallas | 22 | 3.5% | 143 |
| Miami | 20 | 3.2% | 149 |
Firm size tells a similar story. Firms of 400-999 lawyers took 29.5% of transaction moves against 23.4% market-wide, while firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 44.1% against 53.6%.
| Firm size | Transactions | All practices |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000+ lawyers | 44.1% | 53.6% |
| 400-999 lawyers | 29.5% | 23.4% |
| 150-399 lawyers | 19.1% | 13.3% |
| under 150 lawyers | 7.4% | 9.7% |
A firm with offices in Florida, Texas or the Midwest has a structural reason to recruit in this speciality. The work is proportionally heavier in those cities, and mid-size firms win a larger share of the hires than they do across the market.
Deal counsel and partner hiring sit with different firms
On the deal side, Greenberg Traurig heads the 3-year list of advisers on commercial real estate transaction deals, in the band of 61-100 deals advised. The list below ranks the firms that advised most often; the second list ranks the firms that hired the most transaction partners in 12 months.
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenberg Traurig | 61-100 |
| 2 | CMS | 61-100 |
| 3 | DLA Piper | 61-100 |
| 4 | Clifford Chance | 61-100 |
| 5 | Dentons | 41-60 |
| 6 | Jones Day | 41-60 |
| 7 | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader | 41-60 |
| 8 | Loyens & Loeff | 21-40 |
| 9 | Bass, Berry & Sims | 21-40 |
| 10 | Gide Loyrette Nouel A.A.R.P.I | 21-40 |
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenberg Traurig | 6-10 |
| 2 | White & Case | 3-5 |
| 3 | Mayer Brown | 3-5 |
| 4 | Seyfarth Shaw | 3-5 |
| 5 | Dentons | 3-5 |
| 6 | King & Spalding | 3-5 |
| 7 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 3-5 |
| 8 | Shutts & Bowen | 3-5 |
| 9 | Holland & Knight | 3-5 |
| 10 | Norton Rose Fulbright | 3-5 |
Only two firms appear on both lists. The top 10 partner hirers took 22.7% of transaction partner moves, so the firms doing the most deals are largely not the ones adding the most partners. For a hiring firm, the deal list is a map of where experienced transaction partners sit today, and the hiring list shows who is already competing for them.
What this means for firms hiring transaction partners
Sartori & Partners data point to a short plan. First, screen candidates for fund clients, not only owner clients: asset managers and funds commission 16.3% of transaction deals, and that book is what separates a partner who can grow a practice from one who serves a single owner. Second, recruit where the work over-indexes, with Miami at 149 and Dallas at 143 against the market's city mix.
Third, plan for time. Partner hiring held flat (-6.6%) while deals grew, and on the data date law-firm career pages listed 374 open transaction roles, a count of openings live on that one day rather than a measure of hiring over time. A firm that waits for the pool to widen will wait while its rivals keep the same partners busy. Start the search before the next portfolio mandate arrives, not after.
Questions readers ask
Who are the clients of commercial real estate transaction lawyers?
Real estate companies commissioned 64.5% of dated deals over 3 years, and asset managers and funds 16.3%, per Sartori & Partners data. Financial sponsors added 5.8%. A deal can carry several client industries.
How many commercial real estate deals do law firms handle in a year?
Law firms announced 606 dated commercial real estate transaction deals in the 12 months to October 2026, and 1,622 over 3 years. Property deals proper were 89.5% of the 3-year total. The counts are matters on record, not a measure of fees.
Is lateral partner hiring in commercial real estate rising?
Partner hiring in commercial real estate transactions held flat (-6.6%), with 197 moves in the latest settled 12 months. All lateral moves in the speciality held flat (+4.2%) as well, while the practice's dated deals rose 9.6%.
Which cities over-index for commercial real estate transaction hiring?
Miami, Dallas and Chicago over-index, at 149, 143 and 132 on an index where the market's own share is 100. New York matches the market exactly.
Where this comes from
The monitor behind this report
Related reports
Hiring in this market
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].
For law firm leaders
Planning a partner hire in this market?
We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.