Specialities · November 2026
Construction Contract Lawyers in 2026: Partners In, Few Counsel
Construction contracts hiring runs on partners, at 44.0% of moves, while counsel take 7.5%, a thinner tier than in construction as a whole. Partners can be hired from the market; the level below them mostly has to be built at home.
The short version
- Partners made up 44.0% of construction contracts laterals in the 12 months to October 2026, against 27.7% across the market.
- Counsel took only 7.5% of construction contracts moves, against 15.4% in construction and 15.3% in construction disputes.
- Over 3 years London took 9.6% of construction contracts hires, ahead of New York at 6.5%.
- The top 10 hirers took 25.9% of individual construction contracts hires in 12 months, against 12.9% market-wide.
The analysis
Construction contract lawyers who change firms are partners far more often than the lateral market as a whole. Sartori & Partners data show that partners made up 44.0% of the 159 construction contracts lateral moves in the 12 months to October 2026, against 32.0% in construction and 27.7% across all practices. Counsel, the senior tier below partner, took only 7.5%. This is the transactional side of construction: the lawyers who write and negotiate the contracts that allocate cost, time and risk on a project. The speciality accounts for 17.4% of construction moves. For a firm hiring here, the market hands over senior names more readily than mid-level ones, and that shapes every search.
- 44.0%
- partners, construction contracts moves
- 7.5%
- counsel, construction contracts moves
- 15.4%
- counsel, construction as a whole
- 27.7%
- partners, all practices
Partners are a larger share of moves than in construction or the market
The partner share in construction contracts sits 12.0 points above its own practice and 16.3 points above the market. The disputes side of the same practice runs at 34.9%, close to the construction figure, so the tilt belongs to contracts work alone. Associates make up 48.4% of construction contracts moves, against 52.4% in construction and 58.5% market-wide.
| Level | Construction contracts | Construction |
|---|---|---|
| partner | 44.0% | 32.0% |
| counsel | 7.5% | 15.4% |
| associate | 48.4% | 52.4% |
The pattern is not a one-year accident. Over 3 years, partners were 40.6% of construction contracts moves, against 30.8% in construction and 26.9% across the market. Contracts work rewards judgment built over many projects, and a partner who has set the risk terms on a long run of builds carries relationships with owners, contractors and lenders that travel with the name. A firm that wants a contracts partner is recruiting from the part of this pool that moves most often; the harder brief sits one level down.
Counsel are the thinnest tier in both windows
Counsel took 7.5% of construction contracts moves in the 12 months, against 15.4% in construction, 15.3% in construction disputes and 12.7% across the market. The 3-year record points the same way: counsel were 10.6% of construction contracts moves, against 13.4% in construction and 12.1% market-wide.
Fewer movers step up a title than elsewhere in construction. In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, 12.6% of construction contracts laterals joined at a higher title than the one they left, against 16.8% in construction and 17.9% in construction disputes; the market figure is 12.9%. With few counsel on the move, the jump from counsel to partner has fewer candidates to draw on than elsewhere in the practice.
Firms grow this level from within instead. Over the past 5 years the median construction contracts lawyer made partner after 11.0 years of practice, and 68.6% got there within 12 years; on the disputes side the median is 10.0 years. A firm that needs a senior contracts lawyer below partner should plan to promote, or to hire a strong associate with room to grow, because the lateral market rarely offers counsel-level names at the moment a mandate opens.
London is the first city on the 3-year record, New York well behind
Over 3 years, London took 9.6% of construction contracts hires, the largest share of any city, against 7.0% in construction and 10.0% across the market. New York came second at 6.5%, under the 10.4% it holds in construction and far under its 14.2% share of all lateral moves. Houston, at 5.6%, and Denver, at 4.4%, both sit well above their market weight of 2.1% and 1.3%.
| City | Construction contracts | Construction |
|---|---|---|
| London | 9.6% | 7.0% |
| New York | 6.5% | 10.4% |
| Houston | 5.6% | 4.5% |
| Denver | 4.4% | 3.5% |
London has long been a center for international project contracts, and energy and infrastructure work keeps Houston and Denver busy. Sartori & Partners data show that a New York search for a contracts lawyer starts from a smaller pool than the city's weight in the market suggests. A firm building this bench should look first in London, Houston and Denver, and treat a New York shortlist as one source among several.
Large platforms hire more of it than of construction, and a short list of firms does much of the hiring
Among moves to firms of known size, firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 40.8% of construction contracts laterals, against 34.0% in construction and 53.6% across the market. The speciality sits between the two: the largest platforms hire more of it than of the rest of construction, though less than of the average practice. Firms of 400-999 lawyers took 29.3%, against 27.0% in construction and 23.4% market-wide.
Hiring is concentrated. The top 10 hirers took 25.9% of individual construction contracts hires in the 12 months, against 15.9% in construction and 12.9% across the market; Dentons ranked first. Over 3 years the top 10 share was 20.4%, against 16.1% in construction. Over 3 years the most active hirer of construction contracts partners was Greenberg Traurig, followed by Addleshaw Goddard and DLA Piper. On the supply side, among movers whose former firm's size is known, 15.8% of construction contracts movers over 3 years came from firms of under 150 lawyers, against 18.9% in construction and 11.4% market-wide.
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenberg Traurig | 6-10 |
| 2 | Addleshaw Goddard | 6-10 |
| 3 | DLA Piper | 6-10 |
| 4 | Dentons | 6-10 |
| 5 | Taft Stettinius & Hollister | 6-10 |
| 6 | Eversheds Sutherland | 3-5 |
| 7 | Maynard Nexsen | 3-5 |
| 8 | Nossaman | 3-5 |
| 9 | Dickinson Wright | 3-5 |
| 10 | Freeths | 3-5 |
For a mid-size firm, the partner it wants may also be talking to the firms on this list, so its offer has to answer their pitch on reach and support. Lawyers at firms of under 150 lawyers are a realistic source, more so than in the market as a whole, and a search that screens only large firms misses them.
The count holds steady while the wider market grows
Construction contracts hiring held flat (-11.0%), with 161 moves in the 12 months to September 2026 against 181 a year earlier. The partner count held flat (-4.2%), at 68 against 71, so the partner-heavy mix is not the product of a surge. Construction as a whole held flat (-1.8%) over the same windows. Across all practices, hiring rose 9.0%.
The work behind these hires leans to property: of the 40 dated matters on record for the speciality over 3 years, 57.5% were real estate deals. A steady count gives no sign of new supply that would ease a search, so a firm that waits for more candidates to appear is betting against the record.
What this means for firms hiring construction contract lawyers
Start with the partner search, because that is where the market is liquid: partners are 44.0% of construction contracts moves, so a lateral partner is a realistic hire. Expect to meet large platforms on the same candidates, since firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 40.8% of moves to firms of known size and the top 10 hirers took 25.9% of individual hires, and prepare an answer on platform and support before the first meeting. Treat the counsel tier as a build, not a buy: with counsel at 7.5% of moves, the reliable route is to hire associates and promote them, and to time that plan against a median of 11.0 years to partner. Search London, Houston and Denver before New York. Open the mandate now rather than waiting for a better year: the count is steady, so the pool will not grow on its own.
Questions readers ask
Are construction contract lawyers who change firms mostly partners?
Partners made up 44.0% of construction contracts lateral moves in the 12 months to October 2026, against 27.7% across the market, Sartori & Partners data show. Associates were 48.4%.
How hard is it to hire construction contracts counsel laterally?
Hard: counsel were only 7.5% of construction contracts moves, against 15.4% in construction overall. Over 3 years the share was 10.6%, still below the practice.
Which cities hire the most construction contracts lawyers?
Over 3 years London took the largest share, 9.6%, ahead of New York at 6.5% and Houston at 5.6%. Denver follows at 4.4%.
Is construction contracts hiring growing?
No: construction contracts hiring held flat (-11.0%) year on year, at 161 moves against 181. Across all practices, hiring rose 9.0% over the same windows.
Where this comes from
The monitor behind this report
Related reports
Hiring in this market
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].
For law firm leaders
Planning a partner hire in this market?
We run retained partner searches using the same data behind this page.