Practice Areas · Construction · Infrastructure and PPP
Infrastructure and PPP Recruiters
An infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter for law firms and for the authorities, sponsors, contractors, and funds that hire concession counsel.
Infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter
An infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter places counsel who close concessions and availability-payment deals, for firms and for the companies and authorities that hire them. The World Bank's 2024 PPI report counted $100.7 billion across 315 projects in low- and middle-income countries. Reason Foundation's May 2026 report counted three U.S. surface-transportation P3 closings of $9.5 billion in 2025, against $2.3 billion in 2024. H.R. 6500, signed 2 September 2026, extended surface-transportation authorities through 11 December 2026. Sartori closed 9 infrastructure and PPP searches since 2019. A state toll authority in Georgia hired its first P3 counsel in 13 weeks in 2025.
What is actually being financed.
Three published series, three different denominators. Each figure below carries its year and its source in the same sentence.
- $100.7bn
- Private participation in infrastructure, low- and middle-income countries, 2024
- World Bank PPI 2024 Annual Report
- $9.5bn
- U.S. surface-transportation P3 financial closings, calendar 2025
- Reason Foundation, May 2026
- $92.4bn
- Global P3 infrastructure transactions financed in 2025
- Reason Foundation, May 2026
An infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter is hired when the document is a concession, a project agreement, or the financing that sits under it. The parent page is construction recruitment. Operating-asset acquisitions of energy networks, transport corridors, and utilities sit on real estate infrastructure. This page is the procurement and the long-term contract: design, build, finance, operate, maintain, and the availability or toll payment that services the debt.
The World Bank's Private Participation in Infrastructure 2024 Annual Report recorded $100.7 billion of PPI investment across 315 projects in low- and middle-income countries. That is 16 percent above $87.1 billion in 2023 and 20 percent above the prior five-year average of $83.7 billion, and the first year the series cleared $100 billion since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The database records investment commitments at financial close in the primary market. Refinancings, mergers, and secondary sales are outside it. It is the developing-country series, and it is a public count of new private infrastructure commitments.
The same report states that Brazil, China, and India accounted for 59 percent of total PPI over 2020–2024. Excluding those three countries, private investment commitments were $41.5 billion in 2024, 37 percent above 2023. A U.S. or London projects partner who has only closed domestic managed lanes is a partial match for a sponsor whose pipeline is in those three markets. The hiring specification has to say which concession regime the lawyer has actually used.
In the United States the 2025 surface-transportation count is smaller and more specific. Reason Foundation's Annual Surface Transportation Infrastructure Report, dated May 2026, states that three surface-transportation P3 projects worth $9.5 billion reached financial close in calendar 2025, up from one project totaling $2.3 billion in 2024. The report's table splits that $9.5 billion into the SR 400 Express Lanes in Georgia at $8.7 billion on a 50-year toll DBFOM, additional financing of $650 million on SH-130 in Texas that reached financial close in December 2025, and a $95 million refinancing of Denver FasTracks Eagle P3 that reached financial close in May 2025. Two of the three are not new greenfield highways. A search brief that says "any P3 lawyer" will return people who have only refinanced an operating concession.
The same May 2026 surface report counts 50 worldwide surface-transportation P3 closings worth $30.2 billion in 2025, mainly in Asia, Europe, and South America, with 10 closings above $1 billion. In 2024, four closings exceeded $1 billion. Reason's separate Annual Transportation Finance Report, also May 2026, uses a wider net: infrastructure investors financed $92.4 billion of P3 infrastructure transactions in 2025, of which greenfield projects were $61.2 billion, 66.2 percent of the total, across 86 greenfield projects. The $9.5 billion, the $30.2 billion, and the $92.4 billion are not three views of one number. They are a U.S. surface set, a global surface set, and a global all-sector P3 set.
Authority to sign those contracts is uneven inside the United States. Reason's May 2026 surface report, citing the FHWA Center for Innovative Finance Support's state P3 legislation page, counts 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as jurisdictions with transportation P3 authority. The same passage states that full P3s have been implemented in only 12 states, in Puerto Rico, and on projects under the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. A lateral partner whose concessions are all in one of those 12 states is not automatically the lawyer for a first concession in a state whose statute still requires a project-by-project legislative vote.
The statutes that changed the hiring brief.
Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in late 2021. Public Law 117-58 was signed on 15 November 2021. Section 70701 requires a value-for-money or comparable analysis for certain projects with an estimated total cost above $750 million, where the sponsor is in a state that authorizes transportation P3s, intends to seek TIFIA or RRIF credit assistance, and expects user fees or other revenues that can support capital and operating costs. Section 11508 requires a detailed value-for-money analysis in the financial plan of a major project the sponsor intends to deliver as a P3.
On 3 March 2026 the Build America Bureau and the Federal Highway Administration published final guidance in the Federal Register, 91 FR 10440, docket DOT-OST-2026-0761. The guidance treats the decision to advance a project as a P3 as a Stage 1 question, when information is still thin, and expects a detailed value-for-money analysis at Stage 2 for projects that proceed, including the elements in section 70701. It also expects the analysis and key concession terms to be made public before the concession is signed, subject to statutory limits on disclosure. That file is a counsel work product. Authorities that wait until a preferred bidder is selected to hire the lawyer who can write it are hiring after the statutory clock has already started.
The same IIJA raised the lifetime cap on tax-exempt private activity bonds for surface-transportation P3s from $15 billion to $30 billion. Reason's May 2026 surface report states that, as of November 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation had issued or allocated the entire $30 billion. The report's point is mechanical: a financing that needs a new PAB allocation is now waiting on a reauthorization, a higher cap, or a structure that does not depend on the cap. Counsel who have only documented a PAB issuance from the years when capacity remained are being asked a different question in 2026.
The IIJA surface-transportation authorization was due to expire on 30 September 2026. On 2 September 2026 the President signed H.R. 6500, the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027. The White House statement of that date says the act extends surface-transportation authorities. Division C of the enrolled bill, the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2026, defines the extension end date as 11 December 2026 and continues covered laws that would otherwise have expired after 30 September 2026. Covered laws expressly include Divisions A, B, and C of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law 117-58. The hiring window this creates is short. A concession that needs federal credit tools or a federal approval tied to those authorities is being negotiated against an 11 December 2026 date, not against a five-year bill.
Six seats, six different documents.
The same concession produces different lawyers. The brief has to name which seat is open.
State DOTs and toll authorities
The public sponsor that runs the procurement, signs the concession, and has to produce the value-for-money analysis before a TIFIA or RRIF request.
Concessionaires and equity sponsors
The private party that bids, holds the equity, and lives with the handback, the availability regime, and the revenue risk for 30 to 50 years.
Design-build and EPC contractors
The delivery partner inside the concession. Its counsel negotiates the design-build contract against the concession agreement, not a standalone private build.
Infrastructure funds and pension investors
The in-house seat that underwrites greenfield concessions and brownfield stakes. The brief is the concession and the financing, not a general commercial portfolio.
Project-finance lenders
Banks and credit funds whose counsel paper security, intercreditor terms, and drawdown conditions against a public counterparty.
Law-firm projects groups
Lateral partners and counsel hired for a concession practice: sponsor-side, authority-side, or lender-side. A construction-litigation book is a different search.
State departments of transportation and toll authorities are the public sponsor. They choose the delivery model, run the procurement, and sign the concession agreement. Under the March 2026 guidance, a sponsor that expects to use TIFIA or RRIF has to complete value-for-money work before it decides to advance the project as a P3. The in-house hire at this seat is often the first dedicated P3 counsel, sitting next to a procurement staff that has let design-build contracts and has not let a 40-year concession. Georgia's SR 400 Express Lanes, the $8.7 billion DBFOM in Reason's 2025 table, is the scale of file that produces that hire.
Concessionaires and equity sponsors are the private counterparty. Reason's table names the SR 400 concessionaire side as Acciona, Grupo ACS, Meridiam, and Dragados, with a 50-year toll concession. Their counsel negotiates risk allocation against the authority's draft, the equity documents among sponsors, and the handback condition at the end of the term. A lawyer who has represented only the authority has not lived with the equity IRR. A lawyer who has represented only the sponsor has not written the public-sector value-for-money memo. Firms and companies both ask for "P3 experience" and then reject the shortlist when the side of the table is wrong.
Design-build and EPC contractors sit inside the concession. Their contract is downstream of the project agreement. Payment, relief events, and termination have to match the concession or the contractor carries a risk the authority has already allocated to the concessionaire. That is a different draft from a private commercial building. The industry page for contractor and engineer legal hiring is construction and engineering. The industry page for sponsor and lender project finance is infrastructure and project finance.
Infrastructure funds and pension investors hire when the asset is held, not only when it is bid. Reason's May 2026 finance report separates greenfield ($61.2 billion, 86 projects) from refinancing, M&A, and additional financing inside the $92.4 billion 2025 total. An in-house counsel at a fund that buys operating concessions spends the year on covenant compliance, handback reserves, and bolt-on financings. An in-house counsel at a greenfield developer spends it on bid qualification and financial close. The titles look alike. The last three transactions do not.
Project-finance lenders hire for the debt. Security over the concession, direct agreements with the authority, and the conditions to each draw are the work. A corporate lending lawyer who has financed a contractor's balance sheet has not documented a limited-recourse concession. Renewable generation concessions overlap this seat. That hiring question is on energy transition legal hiring in 2026, and the hydrogen and carbon-capture project-finance read is on project finance for green hydrogen and CCS.
Law firms hire the lateral. The partner search is a book of concessions, a conflicts check against existing authority clients, and a platform that can staff a financial close. The counsel and associate search is document depth: who has turned a concession from preferred bidder to financial close, and on which side. Construction defect, delay, and surety litigation remain on the construction practice. Government contracts and public finance, where the work is an appropriation or a bond issue rather than a concession, start at government and public sector. Energy projects that are not a P3 start at renewable energy.
What a PPP hire is paid against.
Public data prices the associate scale and a blended projects book. It does not price a PPP counsel seat on its own.
Bloomberg Law reported on 2 June 2026 that Milbank's associate scale would run from $235,000 for a first-year to $455,000 for an eighth-year. Above the Law, the same day, reported the new scale as effective 1 July 2026. That is the lockstep ceiling a projects partner is asked about when a senior associate moves. It is not a PPP band, and most concession work is not done at the firms that match it. The class-year ladder is on the 2026 BigLaw associate salary scale. The construction-specific comparison, including pay at smaller firms and in-house construction roles, is on construction attorney salary in 2026. Company-side cash, bonus, and equity structure is on in-house counsel salary in 2026.
For partners, the published Sartori & Partners book-of-business table puts Projects/Energy/Infrastructure partners who report in U.S. dollars at a median of about $3 million, on 24 interviews, with a range from $0.2 million to $13.5 million. The cell mixes projects, energy, and infrastructure. It is not a highway-concession median, and it is not a compensation survey. It is the origination figure firms use when they underwrite a lateral. The full table is on partner book of business by practice. A partner move in that blended practice is run through energy and projects lateral partner recruiting.
Search fees on a company mandate are retained only. The fee is 25–30 percent of the hire's total first-year compensation. Thirty percent of that fee is paid as a retainer at engagement and kept if the client cancels. The replacement guarantee is 12 months on retained general counsel, chief legal officer, and chief compliance officer searches, and 6 months on other in-house searches. Offer acceptance on the retained in-house book is 96 percent. Retention of placed in-house leaders is 97 percent at 12 months and 91 percent at 24 months. Those are firm-wide figures. They are not a separate PPP rate.
Infrastructure and PPP searches since 2019.
Sartori closed 9 infrastructure and PPP searches since 2019. 4 were lateral partner searches, 2 were law-firm counsel searches, and 3 were in-house. The 3 in-house searches sit inside the 400+ placements since 2017 (230+ in-house). They are not an addition to that total. The 4 partner searches are outside the 230+, which counts in-house placements.
On those 9 searches the median time to shortlist was 21 days, and the median time to an accepted offer was 12 weeks. A state toll authority in Georgia hired its first P3 counsel in 2025. The shortlist was delivered on day 19. The accepted offer was in week 13. That single search sits inside the medians: day 19 is faster than the 21-day median, and week 13 is one week slower than the 12-week median.
A general counsel at a state toll authority in Georgia told us, The shortlist named lawyers who had closed a DBFOM concession.
The Georgia hire is the shape of the in-house brief on this page. The authority needed a counsel who had already closed a design-build-finance-operate-maintain concession. The shortlist was built to that document, on a 19-day clock, with an accepted offer in week 13 of 2025. It is one of the 3 in-house searches in the 9.
Lateral partner, projects and P3
Confidential partner moves where the book is concessions, availability-payment deals, or the financing around them.
Explore this search 02In-house P3 and concessions counsel
Counsel and deputy general counsel for authorities, sponsors, contractors, and infrastructure funds.
Explore this search 03Associate and counsel depth
Lawyers who have closed a DBFOM or an availability-payment financing, not a general construction seat.
Explore this search 04Projects lateral, energy and infrastructure
The partner search when the practice sits across projects, energy, and infrastructure rather than a pure highway concession.
Explore this searchWhere the 2025 closings sit on the construction map.
City pages below are the construction practice in that market. They are not a separate PPP census.
SR 400 is a Georgia project, so the construction market page that sits next to it is Atlanta. SH-130's additional financing is a Texas toll road south of Austin. The Texas construction pages we publish are Dallas and Houston, which is also where energy and projects benches concentrate. The Denver FasTracks refinancing sits on Denver. Federal credit tools, the March 2026 value-for-money guidance, and the private-activity-bond cap are Washington work, on Washington. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is one of the few public sponsors Reason names as having implemented full P3s, which is why New York stays on this list even when the year's largest U.S. closing was in Georgia.
Cross-border concessions pull the same lawyers toward London and the Gulf, because the sponsor, the lender, and the authority are often in three countries. The market articles that describe the project-finance end of that work are project finance for green hydrogen and CCS and whether energy-transition law is hiring in 2026. They are adjacent reads. They are not a substitute for the concession count on this page.
Dated sources for the figures above.
Sources
10 references- World Bank, Private Participation in Infrastructure 2024 Annual Report ppi.worldbank.org ↗
- World Bank PPI database hub, 2024 investment summary ppi.worldbank.org ↗
- Reason Foundation, Annual Surface Transportation Infrastructure Report 2026 (May 2026) reason.org ↗
- Reason Foundation, Annual Transportation Finance Report 2026 (May 2026) reason.org ↗
- Federal Register, 3 March 2026, 91 FR 10440, P3 value-for-money guidance federalregister.gov ↗
- White House, H.R. 6500 signed into law, 2 September 2026 whitehouse.gov ↗
- Congress.gov, H.R. 6500 actions, signed 2 September 2026 congress.gov ↗
- H.R. 6500 enrolled bill, Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2026, extension end date 11 December 2026 govinfo.gov ↗
- Bloomberg Law, Milbank associate scale, 2 June 2026 news.bloomberglaw.com ↗
- Above the Law, Milbank scale effective 1 July 2026 abovethelaw.com ↗
Infrastructure and PPP recruitment — common questions
What does an infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter search for?
An infrastructure PPP lawyer recruiter searches for lawyers who close concessions and availability-payment deals, for law firms and for the authorities, sponsors, contractors, and funds that hire them. The World Bank's 2024 PPI report counted $100.7 billion across 315 projects in low- and middle-income countries. Reason Foundation's May 2026 surface-transportation report counted $9.5 billion of U.S. P3 financial closings in 2025. H.R. 6500, signed 2 September 2026, extended federal surface-transportation authorities through 11 December 2026.
Who hires infrastructure and PPP lawyers?
Six categories hire them. State departments of transportation and toll authorities procure the concession and write the value-for-money file. Concessionaires and equity sponsors bid and hold the asset. Design-build and EPC contractors deliver inside the concession. Infrastructure funds and pension investors hire in-house. Project-finance lenders hire for the debt. Law firms hire lateral partners and counsel into projects groups. Airports, ports, universities, and water authorities use the same concession forms on social infrastructure.
How many infrastructure and PPP searches has Sartori closed?
Sartori closed 9 infrastructure and PPP searches since 2019: 4 lateral partner searches, 2 law-firm counsel searches, and 3 in-house searches. The 3 in-house searches sit inside the 400+ placements since 2017 (230+ in-house). On those 9 searches the median shortlist was 21 days and the median time to an accepted offer was 12 weeks. A state toll authority in Georgia hired its first P3 counsel in 2025: shortlist on day 19, accepted offer in week 13.
What changed for U.S. P3 counsel in 2026?
On 3 March 2026 the Build America Bureau and the Federal Highway Administration issued final guidance, at 91 FR 10440, on the value-for-money analysis that IIJA section 70701 requires for certain projects estimated above $750 million. The IIJA surface-transportation authorities were due to expire on 30 September 2026. H.R. 6500, signed on 2 September 2026, continues those authorities through 11 December 2026. Reason Foundation's May 2026 report states that, as of November 2025, the $30 billion private-activity-bond volume cap had been fully allocated.
How is pay set for an infrastructure PPP lawyer?
No public survey isolates PPP counsel cash. The firm-side ceiling in view is the associate scale Milbank announced on 2 June 2026, $235,000 for a first-year through $455,000 for an eighth-year, effective 1 July 2026. Construction-specific bands, including the smaller-firm comparison, are on the construction attorney salary page. Published partner-book interviews put Projects/Energy/Infrastructure partners reporting in U.S. dollars at a median of about $3 million (n=24). Retained search fees are 25–30% of first-year total compensation, with a retainer of 30% of the fee.
Infrastructure and PPP
The right concession hire begins with a quiet conversation.
Tell us the mandate — authority, sponsor, contractor, fund, or firm — and we will tell you whether we are the right firm to run it.