Our process is built for San Diego inventor and device conflicts density and IP skill-signature verification, not volume outreach. We test claim-family ownership before first-round partner interviews. We open with a written mandate: practice economics, target product mix (life-sciences prosecution, device patents, hard-tech litigation, post-grant), portable-revenue band, non-negotiable clinical-sponsor walls, guarantee authority and committee timeline. Only then do we map the addressable Intellectual Property partner set from the ~11,000 lawyers we map in San Diego, filtered by patents versus trademark mix, origination band and known platform constraints, against a global research base of nearly 1.5 million lawyer profiles.
Approach is confidential and sequential. We validate interest, three-year originations, active USPTO or PTAB matter lists and reason for move before names reach the client. Conflicts grids run early—often before first-round partner interviews—so a late-stage device or sponsor wall does not waste executive-committee time. Comp discussions stay inside the firm's real guarantee and capital authority; we do not float packages the partnership will not ratify. Counter-offer coaching assumes the 44% San Diego partner incidence our mandate telemetry records and plans resignation timing around live office-action, trial or FDA calendars.
Close support runs through acceptance, resignation, counter-offer navigation and a 90-day integration check on inventor and docket transition. Over the trailing three years that discipline produced 15 completed San Diego Partner Recruiting searches at a 93% completion rate and a 5-month median timeline. The work is technical lateral Intellectual Property partner search—skill-signature tests, conflicts grids and guarantee design—not mass name-gathering.