Our process is built for Miami multi-jurisdiction failure modes—late book verification on LatAm matters billed elsewhere, opposing-party walls on arbitration panels, and dual-track bidding between Florida-founded platforms and national entrants. Conflicts grids run before first-round partner interviews. We open with a written mandate: practice economics, target portable-revenue band, non-negotiable country and client walls, guarantee authority and committee timeline. Only then do we map the addressable International & Cross-Border partner set from our Miami coverage and global research base of nearly 1.5 million lawyer profiles, filtered by M&A versus finance versus disputes mix, language capability, origination band and known platform constraints.
Approach is confidential and sequential. We validate interest, three-year originations, multi-office matter lists and reason for move before names reach the client. Comp discussions stay inside the firm's real guarantee and capital authority; we do not float packages the partnership will not ratify. Counter-offer coaching assumes the 43% Miami partner incidence our mandate telemetry records across 15 closed searches and plans resignation timing around live closings, ICC calendars or Southern District dockets.
Close support runs through acceptance, resignation, counter-offer navigation and a 90-day integration check on client and matter transition. Over the trailing three years that discipline produced 15 completed Miami Partner Recruiting searches at a 93% completion rate and a 5-month median timeline. The work is technical lateral International & Cross-Border partner search—credit rules, conflicts grids and guarantee design—not mass name-gathering. When you are ready to brief us on a specialist partner or team mandate, we underwrite portability first.