Client industries · November 2026
Consumer Litigation Lawyers Are Mostly Associates: 65.7% of Movers
Associates are 65.7% of the lawyers acting for individuals and consumers who changed firms, against 58.5% in the market, and fewer of them join the largest firms. A company hiring a consumer-claims litigator should look at associate level and beyond firms of 1,000+ lawyers.
The short version
- Associates were 65.7% of lateral moves by lawyers focused on individuals and consumers, against 58.5% market-wide.
- Partners were 21.8% of these movers, against 32.4% in insurance and 43.6% in government work.
- Family lawyers carry an index of 3,411 against the market in this group, and immigration lawyers an index of 2,209.
- Firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 33.3% of these moves, against 53.6% across the whole lateral market.
- Associates were 76.7% of moves from law firms to companies between May and October 2026.
The analysis
A general counsel or HR head hiring consumer litigation lawyers often pictures a senior trial lawyer, yet the lawyers who act for individuals and consumers and change firms are a junior group. Sartori & Partners data show 216 lateral moves by lawyers with this focus in the 12 months to October 2026. Associates made 65.7% of them, against 58.5% of all 14,091 lateral moves in the market. Partners were 21.8%, against 27.7%. The group is also unusual in what its lawyers practice and in where they go: family and immigration specialists sit far above their market share, and more of these lawyers join firms outside the 1,000+ lawyers class than the market does. This report sets the level mix, the practice mix and the firm sizes against the whole market, against insurance and government work, and against the moves companies already make when they hire out of law firms.
- 65.7%
- associates among movers with this focus
- 58.5%
- associates among all lateral movers
- 3,411
- index of family lawyers against the market
- +27.7%
- moves with this focus, year on year: rose
Associates are 65.7% of these movers, against 58.5% market-wide
The level mix is the first figure a hiring company should read. Of the 216 lawyers with this focus who moved, 142 were associates, 27 counsel and 47 partners. The associate share runs 7.2 points above the market, while the counsel share, 12.5%, sits beside the market's 12.7%. The tilt is not a one-year accident. Over 36 months, associates were 69.9% of moves with this focus, against 59.2% for the market in the same window.
| Level | Individuals & consumers | All lateral moves |
|---|---|---|
| partner | 21.8% | 27.7% |
| counsel | 12.5% | 12.7% |
| associate | 65.7% | 58.5% |
Other sectors heavy in litigation look different. Associates were 52.3% of insurance movers and 44.2% of government and public sector movers over the same 12 months. For a company, the junior tilt helps on volume and on salary: the candidates most often in motion sit below partner, the level companies hire most often when they recruit out of law firms.
Partners are 21.8% of moves, a thinner senior layer than in insurance or government work
Sartori & Partners figures count 47 partner moves with this focus in 12 months, 21.8% of the group. The partner share is 27.7% across the market, 32.4% among insurance movers and 43.6% among government and public sector movers. The partner count held flat (+37.1%) across the settled 12-month windows, 35 against 48, a gap that counts this small cannot separate from chance. Promotion through a move is no faster here than elsewhere: 13.0% of these lawyers joined at a higher title, against 12.9% in the market.
The consequence is practical. A company that wants a senior consumer litigator, someone who has run a claims docket rather than worked on one, is searching a small pool in which few candidates change firms in any given year. Plan that search as a direct approach to named lawyers on a longer timetable, or hire one level down and give the role room to grow into the senior seat.
Family and immigration lawyers carry the highest indexes in the group
Practice shares overlap, because one lawyer can carry several practices, so the figure to read is the index against the market, which scales the group's share against the market's own share. Family lawyers have an index of 3,411: they appear in 21.3% of these moves, against 0.6% of all lateral moves. Immigration follows at an index of 2,209, with 18.5% against 0.8%. Product Liability & Torts holds the largest share, 36.6%, at an index of 537. General litigation is the exception: Litigation & Disputes lawyers are 31.5% of the group against 39.9% of the market, an index of 79.
| Practice | Individuals & consumers | All lateral moves |
|---|---|---|
| Product Liability & Torts | 36.6% | 6.8% |
| Litigation & Disputes | 31.5% | 39.9% |
| Family | 21.3% | 0.6% |
| Immigration | 18.5% | 0.8% |
| Employment & Labor | 14.4% | 10.7% |
The nearest neighboring pool is insurance, where movers also over-index on product liability and torts, at an index of 367. For a company the indexes show how much of this bench will not fit a corporate seat. Family and immigration work serves private clients in their personal affairs and rarely carries over to defending a business against consumer claims. A search brief should name product liability, torts and general litigation as the target practices and set the rest aside at the first screen.
The largest firms took 33.3% of these moves, against 53.6% across the market
In the Sartori & Partners lateral database, the size class is the size of the firm a lawyer joined. Lawyers with this focus joined firms of 1,000+ lawyers in 33.3% of moves, a gap of 20.3 points below the market. Firms of 150-399 lawyers took 22.1% against 13.3%, firms under 150 lawyers 16.9% against 9.7%, and firms of 400-999 lawyers 27.7% against 23.4%. Origins point the same way. Over 36 months, 26.4% of the moves with a known origin started at firms under 150 lawyers, against 11.4% for the market.
| Firm size | Individuals & consumers | All lateral moves |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000+ lawyers | 33.3% | 53.6% |
| 400-999 lawyers | 27.7% | 23.4% |
| 150-399 lawyers | 22.1% | 13.3% |
| under 150 lawyers | 16.9% | 9.7% |
| Rank | Firm | Band |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan & Morgan | 61-100 |
| 2 | Fragomen | 21-40 |
| 3 | Irwin Mitchell | 21-40 |
| 4 | Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel | 11-20 |
| 5 | Keystone Law | 6-10 |
| 6 | Knights | 6-10 |
| 7 | Penningtons Manches Cooper | 6-10 |
| 8 | Weightmans | 6-10 |
| 9 | Fieldfisher | 6-10 |
| 10 | Mishcon de Reya | 6-10 |
Over 36 months, Morgan & Morgan hired the most lawyers with this focus, in the 61-100 band, with Fragomen and Irwin Mitchell next in the 21-40 band. The ten busiest hirers took 33.0% of these moves, against 12.2% for the market's ten busiest, so this bench gathers in fewer firms than the market does. A company that recruits only from firms of 1,000+ lawyers would see 33.3% of the moves in this group; the rest of the bench sits in mid-size and small firms that supplied few of the moves from law firms to companies.
Companies already hire associates out of law firms: 76.7% of moves in-house
Moves from law firms to companies are tracked in full from May 2026, across all sectors, so this comparison covers May to October 2026 with no earlier year beside it. In that window Sartori & Partners recorded 953 moves from law firms to companies. Associates were 76.7% of them and partners 11.0%. That is the level where the consumer bench is deepest, since associates are 65.7% of lateral moves with this focus. Product Liability & Torts lawyers made 4.1% of the moves to companies, so legal departments already recruit from the practice at the core of this group.
The sources differ, though. Most moves to companies came from firms of 1,000+ lawyers, 59.3%, and only 4.3% from firms under 150 lawyers. Lawyers with this focus left firms under 150 lawyers in 26.4% of moves over 36 months. The windows differ, so read the two as directions rather than one measure: the habit of hiring from the largest firms points a company away from where much of this bench works, and a search that stops at those firms will miss it.
What this means for a company hiring a consumer-claims litigator
Movement in this group is picking up. Moves by lawyers with this focus rose 27.7% year on year, from 173 to 221 in the settled 12-month windows, while the whole market rose 9.0%. Write the role at associate or counsel level unless the job truly needs a partner: associates are 65.7% of this bench and 76.7% of the moves companies already make out of law firms. Search firms of 150-399 lawyers and under 150 lawyers, not only the largest names, since the largest class took 33.3% of these moves. Screen for product liability, torts and general litigation, and set aside the family and immigration specialists who lift the group's indexes. For a senior hire, allow a longer search and a direct approach: partners are 21.8% of these movers, against 27.7% in the market.
Questions readers ask
What should a company know before hiring consumer litigation lawyers?
That the bench is junior: associates were 65.7% of lateral moves by lawyers focused on individuals and consumers, against 58.5% across the market. Partners were 21.8%, against 27.7%.
Which practices do lawyers who act for individuals and consumers cover?
Product Liability & Torts is the largest, at 36.6% of moves, while Family and Immigration over-index most, at 3,411 and 2,209. General litigation sits at an index of 79, below the market.
What size of firm do consumer-focused lawyers join?
Smaller than the market: firms of 1,000+ lawyers took 33.3% of their moves, against 53.6% market-wide. Firms under 150 lawyers took 16.9%, against 9.7%.
Are moves by consumer-focused lawyers rising?
Yes: moves with this focus rose 27.7%, from 173 to 221 in the settled 12-month windows, while the market rose 9.0%. The partner count held flat (+37.1%).
Where this comes from
The monitor behind this report
Related reports
Working with us
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.
Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].
For general counsel and boards
Hiring a lawyer in-house?
A retained search starts with the market: who could take the role, where they sit and what it will take to move them.