Client industries · November 2026

Which Law Firms Act for Consumers: Disputes Are 91.2% of Deals

When the client is a person, the matter is almost always a dispute: 91.2% of deals for individuals and consumers, 3.6 times the market share, at a median disclosed value of $18.8 million. Washington, not New York, is the first city for the lawyers on these matters.

Hire legal talent In-house counsel recruiting
01 Key facts

The short version

  • Disputes and investigations were 91.2% of deals for individual clients, against 25.0% across all sectors.
  • Product Liability & Torts lawyers worked on 21.3% of deals for individuals, 10.1 times their share of all deals.
  • Lawyers in Washington, DC worked on 26.1% of deals for individual clients, ahead of New York at 20.3%.
  • Disclosed deals for individual clients had a median value of $18.8 million, against $750 million in insurance.
  • Deal volume for individuals and consumers rose 15.8% year on year, while the whole deal market rose 10.6%.
02 November 2026 edition

The analysis

A general counsel facing claims from customers or members of the public soon asks which law firms represent consumers against companies, and what those firms spend their time on. Sartori & Partners data show 658 deals with individual or consumer clients in the 12 months to October 2026, spread across 298 distinct clients. Disputes and investigations were 91.2% of them. Across all 48,131 deals in the same window, the type was 25.0%. Put plainly, when the client is a person, the matter is almost always a fight, and the firms on the other side of it are not the firms a company hires for its own transactions. This report covers what the claims are about, which firms appear most often for individual clients, where their lawyers sit, how large the matters are, and what a legal department should do with that.

91.2%
of deals for individual clients were disputes and investigations
25.0%
the same share across all deals
$18.8m
median disclosed value, deals for individuals
+15.8%
deals for individual clients, year on year: rose

Disputes run at 3.6 times the market rate when the client is a person

In the Sartori & Partners deal records, disputes and investigations are 91.2% of deals for individuals and consumers, 3.6 times the share the type holds across the whole market. Sectors known for litigation stay well short of that. Disputes were 44.6% of government and public sector deals and 30.2% of insurance deals, both already above the market rate of 25.0%. The gap between individual clients and the whole market is 66.2 points.

For a company, the consequence is direct. When a law firm acts for an individual against it, the firm almost always arrives as a litigator, not as a counterparty across a negotiating table. The first contact is a claim letter, a complaint or a regulator's inquiry, and the response belongs with the disputes team from the first day, not with the business unit that sold the product.

Product liability and torts lawyers sit on 21.3% of these deals

Sorting the same deals by practice shows what the claims are about. Product Liability & Torts lawyers worked on 21.3% of deals with individual clients, 10.1 times their 2.1% share of all deals. These are injury, defective product and negligence claims, the matters a consumer-facing business meets most often. Public Law & Government follows at 18.7%, against 1.8% market-wide, a reminder that part of this work is aimed at public bodies rather than at companies.

Deals for individual and consumer clients by practice, 12 months

Share of all deals with individual clients; one deal can carry several practices, so the bars overlap and do not add up to the whole.

Practice share: deals for individuals against all deals
PracticeIndividuals & consumersAll deals
Product Liability & Torts21.3%2.1%
Public Law & Government18.7%1.8%
White Collar, Investigations & Criminal7.1%0.4%
Litigation & Disputes6.7%3.7%
Immigration5.2%0.1%
Employment & Labor3.2%0.7%

Smaller practices tell the same story. White Collar, Investigations & Criminal lawyers appear on 7.1% of deals for individuals against 0.4% of all deals, and Immigration on 5.2% against 0.1%. Employment & Labor, the practice an employer might expect to meet most, sits at 3.2%, against 0.7% market-wide. The product liability figure is the one to plan around: it is the practice most likely to bring an individual's lawyer to the door, and it calls for a named defense team with trial experience, not a general litigation panel.

The firms acting for individuals are mostly absent from the market's top 10

Sartori & Partners records rank the firms that acted for individual clients by deals advised, shown as bands. Irwin Mitchell and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro head the list, each in the 21-40 band of deals over 12 months. Stewarts, Sidley Austin, Duncan Lewis Solicitors, Bressler, Amery & Ross, Leigh Day, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Jones Day follow in the 11-20 band, and McGuireWoods completes the list in the 6-10 band.

Most active firms for individual and consumer clients, 12 months
RankFirmBand
1Irwin Mitchell21-40
2Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro21-40
3Stewarts11-20
4Sidley Austin11-20
5Duncan Lewis Solicitors11-20
6Bressler, Amery & Ross11-20
7Leigh Day11-20
8Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe11-20
9Jones Day11-20
10McGuireWoods6-10

Set that list against the ten busiest advisers across all deals and only two names repeat: Sidley Austin, which ranks 8th across the whole market, and Jones Day, which ranks 6th. The other eight do not appear among the market's ten busiest firms. Scale differs too: the busiest market firms sit in the 1,200+ band of deals, while no firm acting for individuals passes the 21-40 band.

Busiest advisers across all deals, 12 months
RankFirmBand
1Latham & Watkins1,200+
2Davis Polk & Wardwell1,200+
3Kirkland & Ellis1,200+
4Simpson Thacher & Bartlett701-1200
5Clifford Chance701-1200
6Jones Day701-1200
7White & Case701-1200
8Sidley Austin701-1200
9DLA Piper701-1200
10A&O Shearman701-1200

The practical point for a legal department is that the firms on the other side of consumer claims are largely a different group from the firms on its own panel. With the work spread across 298 clients and no firm above the 21-40 band, a company should track opposing counsel firm by firm as claims arrive, rather than assume that a handful of names will cover them.

Washington, not New York, is the first city for this work

The location figures measure where the work is done: the share of the sector's deals that had lawyers working on them from each city, where one deal can count in several cities. Lawyers in Washington, DC worked on 26.1% of deals for individual clients, against 20.3% for New York. In insurance the order runs the other way: 40.2% of insurance deals were handled with lawyers in New York and 13.6% with lawyers in Washington. Government and public sector deals also put New York first, at 24.9%, with Washington at 17.8%.

Share of deals handled with lawyers in each city: individuals against insurance
CityIndividuals & consumersInsurance
Washington, DC26.1%13.6%
New York20.3%40.2%
London6.8%22.9%
Los Angeles5.8%4.0%
Chicago4.8%10.7%
San Francisco4.6%3.9%

Seattle comes third for individual clients, at 7.4%, ahead of London at 6.8%; in insurance, London lawyers worked on 22.9% of deals. Washington's lead fits the practice mix, since public law, immigration and federal agency matters run through the capital. A company defending consumer claims should check that its counsel can staff Washington well, and should not assume that a panel built around New York covers the place where these matters are fought.

A median of $18.8 million, against $750 million for insurance deals

Value was disclosed on only 5.8% of deals with individual clients, against 20.4% in insurance and 22.3% for government and public sector deals. Where a value was public, the median was $18.8 million. Insurance deals had a median of $750 million, 39.9 times that figure, and public sector deals $1,000 million. Among sectors with a published median, the next lowest is fintech and payments, at $237.9 million.

Claims by individuals are seldom priced in public, and when they are, they are small by corporate standards. Small single values do not mean small exposure. For a company the risk sits in the number of claims and in what each one costs to defend, so budgets, reserves and reporting to the board should run on the whole portfolio of claims, with fee arrangements that suit many modest matters rather than one large one.

Deals for individual clients grew faster than the deal market

Deal volume for individuals and consumers rose 15.8%, from 584 to 676 in the settled 12-month windows. The whole deal market rose 10.6% over the same windows, from 43,590 to 48,216. The two sectors measured alongside it moved less: insurance deal volume held flat (+1.3%), and government and public sector volume held flat (+5.1%). Nothing in these figures suggests that claims from individuals are easing, so a legal department should plan defense capacity for at least the current level of matters next year.

What this means for general counsel facing consumer claims

Treat every claim from an individual as disputes work from the first letter: Sartori & Partners figures put disputes and investigations at 91.2% of deals for individual clients. Give product liability its own named defense team, since lawyers in that practice worked on 21.3% of these deals. Make sure outside counsel can staff Washington, where lawyers worked on 26.1% of the sector's deals. Keep a running file on the firms that act for individuals, starting with the list above, because few of them sit on a corporate panel. Finally, manage the claims as a portfolio: with a median disclosed value of $18.8 million, the cost lies in volume, and volume is still climbing.

03 Questions

Questions readers ask

Which law firms represent consumers against companies?

Irwin Mitchell and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro acted on the most deals for individual clients in the 12 months to October 2026, each in the 21-40 band. Stewarts and Sidley Austin head the 11-20 group that follows.

What kind of matters do individual clients bring to law firms?

Disputes and investigations: they were 91.2% of deals for individuals and consumers, against 25.0% across all sectors. Product Liability & Torts lawyers worked on 21.3% of them.

Where are consumer claims handled?

Washington, DC comes first: lawyers there worked on 26.1% of deals for individual clients, against 20.3% for New York. Seattle follows at 7.4%.

How large are deals for individual clients?

Small: the median disclosed value was $18.8 million, against $750 million in insurance. Value was disclosed on only 5.8% of these deals, so the median rests on a minority of them.

04 Keep reading

Where this comes from

The monitor behind this report

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026.

Edition November 2026. Window: November 2025 to October 2026. Source: Sartori & Partners, from public law-firm announcements, firm websites and professional profiles, checked monthly. Methodology. Spot an error? [email protected].

For general counsel and boards

Hiring a lawyer in-house?

A retained search starts with the market: who could take the role, where they sit and what it will take to move them.