Practice Areas · Antitrust & Competition · Pharma Antitrust

Pharma Antitrust Lawyer Recruiter

A pharma antitrust lawyer recruiter for law firms and for companies. The file is pay-for-delay, Orange Book listings, and pharmacy-benefit cases. Fiscal 2021 produced 199 final pharmaceutical patent settlements.

Hire legal talent Explore a confidential move
199 MMA settlements, FY 2021

A pharma antitrust lawyer recruiter places counsel on pay-for-delay, Orange Book, and pharmacy-benefit matters. The FTC received 199 final pharmaceutical patent settlements in fiscal 2021, in reports published 15 January 2025. On 21 May 2025 it disputed more than 200 Orange Book listings across 17 products. On 28 July 2026 the Court of Appeal upheld the CMA finding that hydrocortisone pack prices rose from under £1 to over £70. Sartori & Partners closed 11 pharma-antitrust searches from January 2023 through September 2026. A deputy general counsel at an NYSE-listed pharmaceutical manufacturer in New Jersey accepted in week 12 during 2025.

01 Market intelligence

Three dated counts. None of them is a headcount of lawyers.

Fiscal-year patent settlements filed with the FTC, Orange Book listings the FTC disputed in 2025, and a UK excessive-pricing finding the Court of Appeal upheld in 2026. They are not one global caseload.

199
Final pharma patent settlements filed in FY 202186 branded products
FTC Bureau of Competition, 15 January 2025
200+
Orange Book listings the FTC disputed on 21 May 202517 brand-name products
FTC, 21 May 2025
£70
Hydrocortisone pack price the CMA found, from under £1Findings upheld 28 July 2026
CMA / GOV.UK, 28 July 2026

A pharma antitrust lawyer recruiter is instructed when the seat is the competition file on a medicine: a patent settlement that restricts generic entry, a listing in the Orange Book, a rebate practice at a pharmacy-benefit manager, or an excessive price on a drug the health service still buys. Antitrust trial work that is not built on a drug is a different bench, on the antitrust litigation page. Unfair competition — trade secrets, false advertising, business torts — is a third bench, on the unfair competition page. FDA pathways, licensing, and Hatch-Waxman patent trials sit on the pharmaceutical practice. The parent practice is antitrust and competition. The industry page is pharmaceuticals.

In fiscal year 2021, from 1 October 2020 through 30 September 2021, pharmaceutical companies filed 199 agreements that finally resolved patent disputes between brand and generic manufacturers. Those 199 settlements related to 86 distinct branded products. The Bureau of Competition said so in its fiscal 2021 MMA report, released with three earlier fiscal years on 15 January 2025. The same note records that, across fiscal years 2018 through 2021, 23 agreements involving 8 drug products restricted the quantity the settling generic could sell. The fiscal 2021 report itself records 11 agreements with that quantity restriction. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act requires the filing. Since October 2018 it also covers biologic and biosimilar manufacturers, as that 15 January 2025 note states. The reports do not decide legality. They are the volume a hiring partner can audit.

The four reports, read as four fiscal years and not as one drug count, record 245 final settlements in fiscal 2018 (111 branded products), 194 in fiscal 2019 (104 products), 205 in fiscal 2020 (111 products), and 199 in fiscal 2021 (86 products). Products repeat across years, so the four figures are filings, not a census of medicines. The fiscal 2018 report calls 245 the most final settlements in any year since the Act.

Sartori & Partners closed 11 pharma-antitrust searches from January 2023 through September 2026. 6 were law-firm laterals. 5 were in-house competition seats. The firm has completed 400+ placements since 2017 (230+ in-house). That series is not this one. Do not add the 11 to the 230+. The market map of lawyers is 1,480,000+. It is not a count of pharmaceutical antitrust specialists. The antitrust practice page's mapped band is the whole competition bar. It is not this file.

Each row is a different object and a different year.
What was counted Period Figure Source
Final brand-generic patent settlements filed FY 2018 245 (111 products) FTC MMA report, released 15 January 2025
Final brand-generic patent settlements filed FY 2019 194 (104 products) Same release
Final brand-generic patent settlements filed FY 2020 205 (111 products) Same release
Final brand-generic patent settlements filed FY 2021 199 (86 products) Same release
Settlements with a quantity restriction FY 2018–2021 23 agreements, 8 products FTC Competition Matters, 15 January 2025
Orange Book listings disputed 21 May 2025 More than 200, across 17 products FTC press release, 21 May 2025
Hydrocortisone pack price the CMA found Findings upheld 28 July 2026 From under £1 to over £70 GOV.UK, 28 July 2026
02 United States

Settlements, listings, and the pharmacy-benefit file.

The MMA reports are 2018 through 2021, published in January 2025. The Orange Book campaign ran again in May 2025. The insulin settlements are 2026. A brief that still says only 'Hatch-Waxman' is describing the patent case, not this seat.

The settlement file did not go quiet when cash reverse payments became harder to write. The 15 January 2025 Bureau note says quantity restrictions — a cap on how much the settling generic may sell — appeared in 23 agreements covering 8 products across fiscal 2018 through 2021, including 11 agreements in fiscal 2021 alone. A counsel who has only negotiated a pure entry date, with no side deal and no volume cap, has a thinner record than the reports describe. The hiring test is documentary. Has this lawyer been on the settlement that was filed, including an agreement entered within 30 days of the primary settlement, which the Act has required since the October 2018 amendment the same note describes?

Orange Book listings are the second U.S. driver, and they have a 2024 court date and a 2025 agency date. On 20 December 2024 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed an order that Teva delist five inhaler patents from the Orange Book, in Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC. The district court order was 10 June 2024. The patents claimed components of a metered-dose inhaler and, the courts held, did not claim the active ingredient. On 21 May 2025 the FTC sent a further round of warning letters and told the FDA it disputed more than 200 listings across 17 brand-name products, including asthma, diabetes, epinephrine autoinjector, and COPD drugs. The same release says the earlier challenges, in November 2023 and April 2024, led to delistings across 22 brand-name products. In April 2024 the Commission had disputed more than 300 listings across 20 products and written to 10 companies. A 2026 hire justified only by "patent litigation experience" misses the listing dispute. The lawyer who has written the certification, or the response to the FTC letter, is the one the brief is describing.

Pharmacy-benefit managers are the third driver, and the dates run into 2026. In July 2024 the FTC's interim staff report said the six largest pharmacy-benefit managers manage nearly 95 percent of prescriptions filled in the United States. The January 2025 second interim staff report said the three largest — Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx — and their affiliated pharmacies generated more than $7.3 billion in revenue above the estimated acquisition cost of specialty generic drugs from 2017 through 2022, with markups of hundreds and thousands of percent. The same January 2025 release says the July 2024 report found that pharmacies affiliated with those three received 68 percent of specialty-drug dispensing revenue in 2023, up from 54 percent in 2016.

The enforcement dates are later than the study. In September 2024 the FTC sued those three managers and affiliated group-purchasing organizations over insulin rebates, as the analysis to aid public comment on the Caremark settlement states. On 4 February 2026 the FTC announced a settlement with Express Scripts. The Commission said the changes are expected to drive down patients' out-of-pocket costs for drugs like insulin by up to $7 billion over 10 years. On 14 July 2026 the FTC announced a settlement with Caremark. The Commission said that settlement locks in place up to $8.5 billion in consumer savings over 10 years and unlocks up to $4.5 billion in additional patient savings over the same period from point-of-sale rebates. The case against Optum was withdrawn from adjudication so the Commission could consider a proposed consent. It is not a third announced settlement. Those dollar figures are the FTC's own expectations. They are not a measured saving, and they are not added together.

Hiring follows that sequence. A manufacturer needs someone who can tell the general counsel whether a settlement will be filed, whether a listing still meets the statute after 20 December 2024, and when to open a rebate inquiry. A pharmacy-benefit manager or a plan sponsor needs someone who has lived inside a formulary decision, not only a lawyer who has tried a Section 2 case about a different industry. Washington, New York, and Philadelphia are the published U.S. markets where that antitrust bar concentrates: Washington, New York, and Philadelphia. There is no separate New Jersey antitrust city page. A New Jersey headquarters still draws from those three markets.

03 Europe and the United Kingdom

A 2025 pay-for-delay judgment, and a 2026 pricing judgment.

Brussels confirmed the fine. London confirmed the excessive-price finding and sent the penalty back. The two numbers are not interchangeable.

On 23 October 2025 the Court of Justice dismissed the appeal in Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Cephalon v Commission, case C-2/24 P. The judgment leaves in place the Commission's 26 November 2020 decision on a modafinil patent settlement. The fines upheld are EUR 30,480,000 on Cephalon and EUR 30,000,000 on Teva. The Court of Justice's October 2025 case-law digest records both amounts and records that the General Court had upheld the classification of the settlement as a restriction of competition by object. A Brussels or London counsel hire in 2026 that still treats pay-for-delay as an open question of principle is a hire against a judgment that has now been refused on appeal. The work that remains is the next settlement: what transfer of value is in the side deals, and whether the entry date is the whole bargain.

The United Kingdom's dated fact is excessive pricing, not a new fine total. On 28 July 2026 the Court of Appeal upheld the Competition and Markets Authority's findings that Auden Mckenzie and Actavis UK charged excessive and unfair prices for hydrocortisone tablets. The GOV.UK notice published that day states that pack prices rose from less than £1 to over £70, and that NHS annual spending rose from around £500,000 to over £80 million. The same notice states that the CMA's decision imposed penalties totalling £266 million. The case page for that investigation, updated the same day, says the penalty appeals were remitted to the Competition Appeal Tribunal because the Tribunal had not given them adequate consideration. The price and the NHS spend are the 2026 holding. £266 million is the penalty the CMA imposed, not a penalty the Court of Appeal affirmed on 28 July 2026.

The hiring consequence is a counsel who can tell a general counsel the difference between those two files. A pay-for-delay settlement is an agreement case. An excessive price on a generic the health service cannot easily switch is a dominance case. A lawyer who has only written U.S. Hatch-Waxman briefs has not, by that fact, run either. Companies with a UK or EU supply of an off-patent medicine, and firms in London or Brussels who defend them, are the buyers. The wider question of whether competition work continues when deal volume falls is on antitrust and competition as a countercyclical practice. The pharmaceutical file dated here is the settlement, the listing, and the excessive price.

Sartori & Partners was founded in 2017 by Lorenzo Sartori. The pharma-antitrust series starts later, in January 2023, and it is the 11 searches already stated. It is not a Brussels census and it is not a London census.

04 Who hires

Four buyers. The shortlist is not the same for each.

Law firms, drug manufacturers, pharmacy-benefit companies, and groups facing a UK or EU pricing or settlement case. One antitrust shortlist fails at least one of them.

01

Law-firm pharma antitrust groups

Washington, New York, Philadelphia, London, and Brussels groups hiring a partner, counsel, or senior associate who has signed the settlement or answered the listing dispute.

02

Brand and generic manufacturers

An in-house competition counsel or deputy under the chief legal officer. The patent trial stays with Hatch-Waxman counsel. This seat owns the antitrust consequence.

03

Benefit managers and plans

Pharmacy-benefit managers, insurers, and plan sponsors whose formulary and rebate terms are now the subject of an FTC study and, for two of the three largest managers, a 2026 settlement.

04

UK and EU pricing defendants

Suppliers of an off-patent medicine, and the firms who defend them, after the October 2025 pay-for-delay judgment and the July 2026 hydrocortisone ruling.

Law firms hire when a partner who owns the pharmaceutical competition file is at capacity, when a counsel leaves for government or in-house, or when a platform has been renting the work. The test on the shortlist is the document. Has this lawyer filed an MMA settlement, defended or challenged an Orange Book listing after 20 December 2024, or lived through a rebate investigation? Tribunal experience matters on the litigation page. It does not substitute here. Of the 6 law-firm searches from January 2023 through September 2026, the median ran to week 18 because notice periods and conflicts run long, not because the market has no names.

Companies hire a different person. The in-house competition counsel decides which settlement gets filed, which listing comes off, and when outside counsel is instructed for a remedy or a government inquiry. The chief legal officer still signs the company's position. The in-house search line is the route for that seat. General counsel and chief legal officer searches, which are not this brief, reach a shortlist in 24 days and an accepted offer in a median of 11 weeks. On the 5 in-house competition seats in this series, the median shortlist was day 26 and the median accepted offer was week 12.

One of those five, in 2025, was a deputy general counsel for competition at an NYSE-listed pharmaceutical manufacturer in New Jersey. The search landed on that in-house median: shortlist on day 26, accepted offer in week 12. The deputy had signed reverse-payment settlements and had answered an Orange Book dispute. The company did not hire a patent trial lawyer and rename the role. The published antitrust markets for that corridor are New York and Philadelphia.

The shortlist had signed reverse-payment settlements and an Orange Book dispute. We did not need a patent trial lawyer under a competition title.

Of the 6 law-firm laterals, one in 2024 was a counsel moving to a Washington platform. The portable work was Orange Book defense and MMA settlement advice. The search landed on the law-firm median: shortlist on day 38, accepted offer in week 18. The notice period was 75 days. That file is one of the 6, not a separate count. The 75 days are that counsel's notice. They are not a market rule.

Benefit managers and plans look like the company hire, with a formulary calendar instead of a patent docket. The wrong profile is a drug-patent litigator who has never read a rebate contract. The wrong profile the other way is a healthcare regulatory lawyer with no competition file. UK and EU buyers are hiring for the judgment they now have to live with: a restriction-by-object settlement theory that survived appeal on 23 October 2025, and an excessive-price finding that survived appeal on 28 July 2026. Agency alumni are candidates in all four categories. Agency seats are outside this search.

2 of the 5 in-house seats drew a counter-offer. Acceptance across all 11 searches was 91 percent. Firm-wide in-house offer acceptance is 96 percent. Retention of placed in-house leaders is 97 percent at 12 months and 91 percent at 24 months. Retention for these 11 searches is the firm-wide figure, not a separate rate. Across all 11, the combined median shortlist was day 33 and the combined median to an accepted offer was week 15. Those combined medians sit between the subgroup medians. They are not an average of the two.

05 Compensation

Pay is published by title and by scale, not by Orange Book.

Use the public surveys for the band, then the antitrust salary page for the rest of the ladder. There is no pharmaceutical-antitrust cell in either survey.

NALP's associate-salary release of 28 May 2025, covering salaries as of 1 January 2025, put the overall median first-year base at $200,000 across 437 offices. $225,000 was the modal first-year figure, at 32.0 percent of offices. That is a first-year, all-practice figure. It is the floor a Washington antitrust associate was hired against at the offices that paid the mode. It is not evidence that a counsel who has run an MMA filing earns a stated multiple of it. NALP did not publish a pharmaceutical-antitrust cut. The July 2026 matching-firm scale is a different object. Above the Law reported on 2 June 2026 that Milbank raised associate base salaries, effective 1 July 2026. Law360 Pulse the same day put that scale at $235,000 to $455,000. Antitrust associates at firms that match the scale sit on it. The scale is not a pharma-antitrust scale.

In-house cash is the ACC and Empsight 2025 Law Department Compensation Survey. The data's effective date is 1 March 2025. The executive summary is the self-reported edition and reports 1,632 respondents. Median base and median total cash, all practices: Expert Attorney $227,000 and $260,000; Associate General Counsel $245,000 and $294,000; General Counsel / Chief Legal Officer $330,000 and $410,000. Antitrust is not a dollar row. A competition counsel hired at the Expert Attorney title should be priced off $227,000 base and $260,000 total cash unless the company's revenue band, in the full survey, says otherwise. An associate general counsel is the $245,000 and $294,000 row. Do not blend proxy total compensation for named executive officers into any of these cash figures.

The pages that carry the city and title cells, without a second set of numbers invented here:

Partner compensation is not a scale. It is origination, the pharmaceutical clients who will actually move, and the notice period. The 75-day notice on the 2024 Washington counsel is an illustration inside the 6, not a market rule. The firm's partner-conversation record is 2,600+. That figure is not a pharma-antitrust census. Fee terms are in the next section. They are a percentage of the hire's first-year total compensation, so the ACC or NALP band is an input to the fee, not a substitute for the offer the client will make.

06 How the search runs

Retained, both sides blind until there is mutual interest.

The fee and the guarantee are firm terms. The days and weeks below are this pharmaceutical series only, from January 2023 through September 2026.

Every search is retained. There is no contingency. The fee is 25–30 percent of the hire's total first-year compensation. Thirty percent of that fee is paid as a retainer at engagement and kept if the client cancels. The replacement guarantee is 12 months on retained general counsel, chief legal officer, and chief compliance officer searches, and 6 months on other in-house searches. A competition counsel or deputy general counsel hired for pharmaceutical antitrust matters is in the 6-month category unless the role is itself a chief legal officer or chief compliance officer seat. We do not approach lawyers we have placed for as long as they stay in post, and we do not recruit from a client's legal department for 24 months after a mandate.

The method is the same on a firm lateral and an in-house competition seat, and the clock is not. Week one is the brief: whether the hire owns settlements, listings, rebate investigations, or a UK or EU pricing defense, and whether Hatch-Waxman patent trials stay with a different counsel. Mapping and private outreach follow. Nothing is sent to the client without the candidate's written consent. Conflicts are checked before the first call. Companies open that conversation at contact. A lawyer who wants a confidential conversation uses the CV form.

Measured on this series, from January 2023 through September 2026: in-house competition seats, 5 searches, median shortlist day 26, median accepted offer week 12. Law-firm laterals, 6 searches, median shortlist day 38, median accepted offer week 18. All 11 searches, median shortlist day 33, median accepted offer week 15. Acceptance 91 percent. Counter-offers on 2 of the 5 in-house seats. The New Jersey deputy general counsel search and the Washington counsel search are the two files described above. They are inside those medians, not additional searches.

A general counsel comparing this with a chief legal officer search should keep the books apart. Chief legal officer shortlists in 24 days and accepted offers in a median of 11 weeks are the officer search. Week 12 is the competition-counsel median on 5 seats. They are close. They are not the same mandate, and the samples are not the same sample.

08 Where this sits

The antitrust practice, the drug file, the salary page.

Pharma antitrust is the specialty. The city pages cover the whole antitrust practice in that market. The pharmaceutical page covers FDA, licensing, and the patent trial.

Antitrust and competition recruiting is the parent. Antitrust litigation and unfair competition are the sibling specialisms. Pharmaceutical recruiting is the drug-development and Hatch-Waxman bench. Pharmaceuticals is the industry page for the companies that hire. City pages for the antitrust practice, which include this file and are not limited to it: Washington, New York, Philadelphia.

Read the antitrust attorney salary page before pricing the seat, and the countercyclical practice article for the wider practice. The brief here is who gets hired once the pharmaceutical competition seat is real: the 2025 settlement reports, the 2025 Orange Book letters, and the 2025 and 2026 court dates.

Sources for the external figures

  1. FTC, Competition Matters, 15 January 2025 — four MMA reports released; 23 quantity-restriction agreements across 8 products in FY 2018–2021; biologic and biosimilar filings since October 2018.
  2. FTC MMA report, FY 2018 — 245 final settlements, 111 branded products.
  3. FTC MMA report, FY 2019 — 194 final settlements, 104 branded products.
  4. FTC MMA report, FY 2020 — 205 final settlements, 111 branded products.
  5. FTC MMA report, FY 2021 — 199 final settlements, 86 branded products; 11 agreements with a quantity restriction.
  6. Federal Circuit, 20 December 2024 — Teva v. Amneal; affirmance of an order delisting five inhaler patents. District court order 10 June 2024.
  7. FTC, April 2024 — more than 300 Orange Book listings disputed across 20 products; letters to 10 companies.
  8. FTC, 21 May 2025 — more than 200 listings disputed across 17 products; earlier rounds led to delistings across 22 products.
  9. FTC, July 2024 interim staff report — the six largest pharmacy-benefit managers manage nearly 95 percent of U.S. prescriptions.
  10. FTC, January 2025 second interim staff report — more than $7.3 billion above estimated acquisition cost, 2017–2022; 68 percent of specialty dispensing revenue in 2023, up from 54 percent in 2016.
  11. FTC analysis to aid public comment, Caremark settlement — insulin complaint filed in September 2024 against the three largest pharmacy-benefit managers.
  12. FTC, 4 February 2026 — Express Scripts settlement; expected out-of-pocket reduction of up to $7 billion over 10 years.
  13. FTC, 14 July 2026 — Caremark settlement; up to $8.5 billion over 10 years and up to $4.5 billion in additional point-of-sale savings. The case against Optum was withdrawn from adjudication to consider a proposed consent.
  14. Court of Justice, monthly case-law digest, October 2025 — judgment of 23 October 2025 in C-2/24 P; fines of EUR 30,480,000 and EUR 30,000,000; Commission decision of 26 November 2020.
  15. GOV.UK, 28 July 2026 — hydrocortisone prices from less than £1 to over £70 a pack; NHS annual spending from around £500,000 to over £80 million; CMA penalties imposed totalling £266 million.
  16. CMA case page, 28 July 2026 — excessive-pricing findings upheld; penalty appeals remitted to the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
  17. NALP, 28 May 2025 — first-year median $200,000 across 437 offices as of 1 January 2025; $225,000 the modal figure at 32.0 percent of offices. Not a pharmaceutical-antitrust cell.
  18. Above the Law, 2 June 2026 — Milbank associate base increase, effective 1 July 2026.
  19. Law360 Pulse, 2 June 2026 — matching-firm scale of $235,000 to $455,000. Not a pharmaceutical-antitrust cell.
  20. ACC / Empsight 2025 Law Department Compensation Survey, executive summary — Expert Attorney $227,000 and $260,000; Associate General Counsel $245,000 and $294,000; General Counsel / Chief Legal Officer $330,000 and $410,000. Effective 1 March 2025. By title, not by pharmaceutical antitrust.

Pharma antitrust recruitment — common questions

What does a pharma antitrust lawyer recruiter search for?

A pharma antitrust lawyer recruiter searches for counsel on pay-for-delay settlements, Orange Book listings, and pharmacy-benefit cases. The FTC received 199 final pharmaceutical patent settlements in fiscal 2021, relating to 86 branded products, in the Bureau of Competition report published with the 15 January 2025 note. On 21 May 2025 the FTC disputed more than 200 Orange Book listings across 17 products. Sartori & Partners closed 11 pharma-antitrust searches from January 2023 through September 2026. A Hatch-Waxman patent trial is a different seat, on the pharmaceutical practice page.

Who hires pharma antitrust lawyers?

Four buyers. Law firms hiring a partner, counsel, or senior associate whose record is reverse payments, Orange Book disputes, or excessive pricing, rather than a general cartel trial. Branded and generic manufacturers hiring an in-house competition counsel under the general counsel. Pharmacy-benefit managers, insurers, and plan sponsors after the FTC's 2024 study and the 2026 settlements with Express Scripts and Caremark. Companies facing a UK excessive-pricing file or an EU pay-for-delay judgment. The parent practice is antitrust and competition.

How long does a pharma antitrust search take?

From January 2023 through September 2026, 5 in-house competition seats reached a shortlist in a median of 26 days and an accepted offer in a median of 12 weeks. 6 law-firm laterals reached a shortlist in a median of 38 days and an accepted offer in a median of 18 weeks. Across all 11 searches the medians were 33 days and 15 weeks. General counsel and chief legal officer searches, a different book, are 24 days to shortlist and 11 weeks to an accepted offer.

What do pharma antitrust lawyers earn?

No public survey publishes a pharmaceutical-antitrust cell. NALP's 28 May 2025 release, salaries as of 1 January 2025, put the overall first-year median at $200,000 across 437 offices, with $225,000 the modal figure at 32.0 percent of offices. The ACC and Empsight 2025 survey, effective 1 March 2025, put Expert Attorney median base at $227,000 and total cash at $260,000, and Associate General Counsel at $245,000 and $294,000. The full ladder is on the antitrust attorney salary page.

How is pharma antitrust hiring different from antitrust litigation or Hatch-Waxman hiring?

Antitrust litigation is a trial bench: cartel damages, monopolization, and follow-on private actions. That page is antitrust litigation. Hatch-Waxman work is the patent case that decides whether a generic application is blocked. Pharma antitrust is the competition file that sits beside that case: a reverse payment, a quantity restriction, an Orange Book listing the FTC disputes, or a rebate system the FTC has sued. A shortlist built only from patent trial lawyers will not staff it.

Do you recruit pharma antitrust counsel for companies as well as law firms?

Yes. Of 11 pharma-antitrust searches closed from January 2023 through September 2026, 5 were in-house competition seats and 6 were law-firm laterals. Acceptance on those 11 searches was 91 percent. Firm-wide in-house offer acceptance is 96 percent. That is a different series. Companies start at contact. Candidates use the confidential CV form.

Pharma antitrust

The right competition hire begins with a quiet conversation.

Tell us whether the seat is a settlement file, an Orange Book dispute, a pharmacy-benefit matter, or a UK or EU pricing defense, and whether it is a firm lateral or an in-house counsel. We will say if a retained search is the right instrument. No obligation.