In 11 closed in-house searches in Rome over 24 months, 4 stalled after we shortlisted corporate counsel who had never sat an EU 2017/373 or EUROCONTROL charging file. We misjudge the seat when a corporate-counsel title is treated as enough. In 11 closed in-house searches in Rome over 24 months, 7 offers went to lawyers already counseling a Rome regulated-infrastructure or aviation operator, Sartori's mandate telemetry shows. A chief legal officer at a regulated infrastructure group said the hire had to have already closed a remote-tower or performance-plan file, not a generic corporate book.
The hireable skill signature is in-house counsel who has already sat tariff regulation, ENAC/EU 2017/373 oversight, EUROCONTROL charging, public-contract procurement, remote-tower and ACC-consolidation architecture, U-space licensing, Legislative Decree 231, subsidiary-board secretariats and export-control. Adjacent feeder seats are in-house counsel at other Rome regulated-infrastructure operators, ENAC's Direzione Legale, and aviation public-contract counsel. A general counsel who briefs a generic corporate search will see CVs that cannot open a performance-plan folder.
Day to day the seat advises the €570 million 2025–2029 capex book ENAV published in April 2025, including the cut from four area control centers to two and remote towers at 16 low-traffic airports in the plan period. Our Rome mandate telemetry on this in-house line records a 32 percent counter-offer incidence. Our median offer-to-acceptance on these Rome files is 15 working days.