Our process is built for Miami stall modes—bar path, language specification and total-cash design—not volume outreach. We open with a written mandate: reporting line, must-have practice depth, sector and LatAm exposure, hybrid floor, compensation envelope (base, bonus target, equity or deferred), Florida Bar or Authorized House Counsel requirement, and non-negotiable industry walls. Only then do we map three candidate pools in parallel—peer in-house counsel, firm laterals at the right seniority, and recent in-house movers who already proved the transition—drawing on our Miami coverage and global research base of nearly 1.5 million lawyer profiles.
Approach is confidential and sequential. We validate interest, matter diet, language depth on live commercial files, reason for move and compensation structure before names reach the client. Total-cash, hybrid and bar-path terms surface early so offers do not collapse at verbal stage. Counter-offer coaching and start-date planning around live deals, closings or vesting cliffs are part of close support. For PE-backed and founder-led clients, we lock GC and business-sponsor interview sequence before candidates are contacted, which protects confidentiality and reduces process drag.
Close and integration matter as much as the offer letter. We stay on the file through acceptance, resignation management, counter-offer navigation and a 90-day check on desk ownership. Over the trailing three years that discipline produced 17 completed Miami In-House Counsel Recruiting searches at a 93% completion rate and a 12-week median timeline. When you are ready to build your in-house legal team, we run the mandate as specialty search, not volume staffing—scorecard and package design first, longlist second.